Hello, I'm a bit confused. I created a VM using 10.3 (amd64) install iso without installing sources. I then downloaded sources as follows: root at c2:/usr/src # svn co https://svn.freebsd.org/base/stable/10 . I then created a custom kernel file and rebuilt and installed world and kernel. I am currently seeing: # uname -v FreeBSD 10.3-RELEASE-p2 #1 r299234M: Sun May 8 07:46:33 EDT 2016 root at my.host.com:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/MYKERNEL I would expect to see: FreeBSD 10.3-STABLE #0 r299234: Sun May 8 07:46:33 EDT 2016 root at my.host.com:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/MYKERNEL I am absolutely certain that I downloaded "STABLE". Am I having a senior moment, or is this behavior not as expected? -- Jim Ohlstein "Never argue with a fool, onlookers may not be able to tell the difference." - Mark Twain
Jim Ohlstein skrev:> > Hello, > I'm a bit confused. > > I created a VM using 10.3 (amd64) install iso without installing > sources. I then downloaded sources as follows: > > root at c2:/usr/src # svn co https://svn.freebsd.org/base/stable/10 . > > I then created a custom kernel file and rebuilt and installed world > and kernel. > > I am currently seeing: > > # uname -v > FreeBSD 10.3-RELEASE-p2 #1 r299234M: Sun May 8 07:46:33 EDT 2016 > root at my.host.com:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/MYKERNEL > > I would expect to see: > > FreeBSD 10.3-STABLE #0 r299234: Sun May 8 07:46:33 EDT 2016 > root at my.host.com:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/MYKERNEL > > I am absolutely certain that I downloaded "STABLE". Am I having a > senior moment, or is this behavior not as expected?Can you show output of: % cd /usr/src % svnlite info % svnlite diff --summarize -- Herbert