On Sun, Jun 28, 2015 at 9:29 AM, Kevin Oberman <rkoberman at gmail.com>
wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 28, 2015 at 3:27 AM, Joseph Mingrone <jrm at ftfl.ca>
wrote:
>
>> Kevin Oberman <rkoberman at gmail.com> writes:
>> > I have narrowed it to between 283990 and 284074. Have to crash, so
maybe
>> > someone else will track it down by tomorrow. I only see a handfull
(<10)
>> > commits in there that look like possible causes. 280434 is
compiling
>> right
>> > now as the prime candidate.
>>
>> Cool. I think you mean 284034 and not 280434. It certainly looks
>> suspicious. I'm trying 284028, but it'll be awhile. It
wouldn't boot
>> with just the kernel, so I'll try building world as well.
>>
>
> Yes, I did.
>
> I can now confirm that 284034 is the culprit. Unfortunately, that single
> commit MFCed 10 updates of which 6 may be the problem. I tend to suspect
> the PCI changes rather than the CardBus patch, but I will spend a little
> time looking at the individual commits in HEAD to see which, if any, touch
> both PCI and CBB.
>
> Adrian, I don't have the ability to test on head ATM, so, if you have a
> chance, go for it. Most if this is way beyond my ken, so I am extremely
> unlikely to spot it.
>
> I am adding jhb@ to the CC as 284034 was his commit.
>
On Sun, Jun 28, 2015 at 9:38 AM, Kevin Oberman <rkoberman at gmail.com>
wrote:
OK. This time I'm REALLY adding jhb@ to the CC. Guess my first cup of tea
had not kicked in.
Adding imp@ and jmg@ to CC. I really suspect 281874, a large update that
touches both PCI and CBB.
If anyone can test on head, I'd start with 281873 (which I suspect will
work) and then 281874, which I suspect will fail.
I have to so some other stuff right now, but I will try to revert just the
changes in 281874 from 284034 later today and see what happens if I get the
time.
Kevin Oberman, Network Engineer, Retired
E-mail: rkoberman at gmail.com
PGP Fingerprint: D03FB98AFA78E3B78C1694B318AB39EF1B055683