-------- In message <20171028123132.GF96685 at kduck.kaduk.org>, Benjamin Kaduk writes:>I would say that the 1.1.x series is less bad, especially on the last count, >but don't know how much you've looked at the differences in the new branch.While "less bad" is certainly a laudable goal for OpenSSL, I hope FreeBSD has higher ambitions. -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk at FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.
On 10/28/2017 09:15, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:> -------- > In message <20171028123132.GF96685 at kduck.kaduk.org>, Benjamin Kaduk writes: > >> I would say that the 1.1.x series is less bad, especially on the last count, >> but don't know how much you've looked at the differences in the new branch. > > While "less bad" is certainly a laudable goal for OpenSSL, I hope > FreeBSD has higher ambitions. >I'm curious about your thoughts on LibreSSL as a possible option.