Nouveau - Mar 2021 - [RESEND 00/53] Rid GPU from W=1 warnings

On Wed, Mar 17, 2021 at 9:32 PM Daniel Vetter <daniel at ffwll.ch>
wrote:
>
> On Wed, Mar 17, 2021 at 9:17 AM Lee Jones <lee.jones at linaro.org>
wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, 11 Mar 2021, Lee Jones wrote:
> >
> > > On Thu, 11 Mar 2021, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > >
> > > > On Mon, Mar 08, 2021 at 09:19:32AM +0000, Lee Jones wrote:
> > > > > On Fri, 05 Mar 2021, Roland Scheidegger wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > The vmwgfx ones look all good to me, so for
> > > > > > 23-53: Reviewed-by: Roland Scheidegger <sroland
at vmware.com>
> > > > > > That said, they were already signed off by Zack,
so not sure what
> > > > > > happened here.
> > > > >
> > > > > Yes, they were accepted at one point, then dropped
without a reason.
> > > > >
> > > > > Since I rebased onto the latest -next, I had to pluck
them back out of
> > > > > a previous one.
> > > >
> > > > They should show up in linux-next again. We merge patches
for next merge
> > > > window even during the current merge window, but need to
make sure they
> > > > don't pollute linux-next. Occasionally the cut off is
wrong so patches
> > > > show up, and then get pulled again.
> > > >
> > > > Unfortunately especially the 5.12 merge cycle was very
wobbly due to some
> > > > confusion here. But your patches should all be in linux-next
again (they
> > > > are queued up for 5.13 in drm-misc-next, I checked that).
> > > >
> > > > Sorry for the confusion here.
> > >
> > > Oh, I see.  Well so long as they don't get dropped, I'll
be happy.
> > >
> > > Thanks for the explanation Daniel
> >
> > After rebasing today, all of my GPU patches have remained.  Would
> > someone be kind enough to check that everything is still in order
> > please?
>
> It's still broken somehow. I've kiced Maxime and Maarten again,
> they're also on this thread.
You're patches have made it into drm-next meanwhile, so they should
show up in linux-next through that tree at least. Except if that one
also has some trouble.
-Daniel
-- 
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
http://blog.ffwll.ch

On Thu, 18 Mar 2021, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 17, 2021 at 9:32 PM Daniel Vetter <daniel at ffwll.ch>
wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Mar 17, 2021 at 9:17 AM Lee Jones <lee.jones at
linaro.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Thu, 11 Mar 2021, Lee Jones wrote:
> > >
> > > > On Thu, 11 Mar 2021, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > On Mon, Mar 08, 2021 at 09:19:32AM +0000, Lee Jones
wrote:
> > > > > > On Fri, 05 Mar 2021, Roland Scheidegger wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > The vmwgfx ones look all good to me, so for
> > > > > > > 23-53: Reviewed-by: Roland Scheidegger
<sroland at vmware.com>
> > > > > > > That said, they were already signed off by
Zack, so not sure what
> > > > > > > happened here.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Yes, they were accepted at one point, then dropped
without a reason.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Since I rebased onto the latest -next, I had to
pluck them back out of
> > > > > > a previous one.
> > > > >
> > > > > They should show up in linux-next again. We merge
patches for next merge
> > > > > window even during the current merge window, but need
to make sure they
> > > > > don't pollute linux-next. Occasionally the cut off
is wrong so patches
> > > > > show up, and then get pulled again.
> > > > >
> > > > > Unfortunately especially the 5.12 merge cycle was very
wobbly due to some
> > > > > confusion here. But your patches should all be in
linux-next again (they
> > > > > are queued up for 5.13 in drm-misc-next, I checked
that).
> > > > >
> > > > > Sorry for the confusion here.
> > > >
> > > > Oh, I see.  Well so long as they don't get dropped,
I'll be happy.
> > > >
> > > > Thanks for the explanation Daniel
> > >
> > > After rebasing today, all of my GPU patches have remained.  Would
> > > someone be kind enough to check that everything is still in order
> > > please?
> >
> > It's still broken somehow. I've kiced Maxime and Maarten
again,
> > they're also on this thread.
> 
> You're patches have made it into drm-next meanwhile, so they should
> show up in linux-next through that tree at least. Except if that one
> also has some trouble.
Thanks for letting me know.

I see some patches made it back in, others didn't.

I'll resend the stragglers - bear with.

-- 
Lee Jones [???]
Senior Technical Lead - Developer Services
Linaro.org ? Open source software for Arm SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog