On Wed, 6 Feb 2002, Brendan Cully wrote:> Is the sample rate changing? The decoder is currently very fussy about > having the audio format stay consistent.Yeah, that's what I thought it might be... most of the MP3s I'm playing are 160, but some are 128 and some are 192... I should convert them all to one bitrate, but I'm just too lazy. And I'm only doing this for fun, and not profit. --Don -- Don Becker don@donbecker.org http://www.donbecker.org Unix System Administrator, Adelphi University http://www.adelphi.edu <p>--- >8 ---- List archives: http://www.xiph.org/archives/ icecast project homepage: http://www.icecast.org/ To unsubscribe from this list, send a message to 'icecast-request@xiph.org' containing only the word 'unsubscribe' in the body. No subject is needed. Unsubscribe messages sent to the list will be ignored/filtered.
On Wednesday, 06 February 2002 at 20:26, Don Becker wrote:> On Wed, 6 Feb 2002, Brendan Cully wrote: > > > Is the sample rate changing? The decoder is currently very fussy about > > having the audio format stay consistent. > > Yeah, that's what I thought it might be... most of the MP3s I'm playing are > 160, but some are 128 and some are 192...Strange. The different bitrates shouldn't be a problem, as long as the music beneath is 44.1kHz stereo (which I would expect at 128+ kbps). I reencode from 128 to 192 regularly, and ices never hiccups at all. What version of LAME did you link against? --- >8 ---- List archives: http://www.xiph.org/archives/ icecast project homepage: http://www.icecast.org/ To unsubscribe from this list, send a message to 'icecast-request@xiph.org' containing only the word 'unsubscribe' in the body. No subject is needed. Unsubscribe messages sent to the list will be ignored/filtered.
On Wed, 6 Feb 2002, Brendan Cully wrote:> Strange. The different bitrates shouldn't be a problem, as long as the > music beneath is 44.1kHz stereo (which I would expect at 128+ kbps). I > reencode from 128 to 192 regularly, and ices never hiccups at all. What > version of LAME did you link against?3.89 beta 1. And, yes, everything's at 44100. Like I said, it's no big deal if I can't figure it out, since ices really does tax my CPU with multiple streams (PIII 450). --Don <p>--- >8 ---- List archives: http://www.xiph.org/archives/ icecast project homepage: http://www.icecast.org/ To unsubscribe from this list, send a message to 'icecast-request@xiph.org' containing only the word 'unsubscribe' in the body. No subject is needed. Unsubscribe messages sent to the list will be ignored/filtered.