Speex dev - Jul 2007 - Speex 1.2 beta2 Win32 tools binaries

Hello speex development team!

As I see on http://www.speex.org/downloads/ page,
where is no Windows binaries for speex encoder and decoder tools for 
1.2beta2 version since no maintainer for it yet.

Well, I compiled it from the sources using MSYS environment and MinGW 
tools (GCC version is 3.4.5).

Both libOgg-1.1.3 and speex-1.2beta2 were configured as
"./configure --enabled-shared=no"

after compiling and applying of  "strip --strip-unneeded" the sizes 
decreases to:

speexdec.exe is 104.293 bytes
speexenc.exe is 132.109 bytes

Both tools work with no problems.

So I can send this binaries to you if you want to place it online.
I'm sure people need it :-)

Arseny

Hi Arseny,
> Well, I compiled it from the sources using MSYS environment and MinGW 
> tools (GCC version is 3.4.5).
> 
> Both libOgg-1.1.3 and speex-1.2beta2 were configured as
> "./configure --enabled-shared=no"
I would really like to be able to compile speexenc and speexdec on
MSYS+MinGW but I can't seem to get it right.

I "./configure --enabled-shared=no", "make", and "make
install" libogg,
without errors, but when I "./configure --enabled-shared=no" Speex I
get
a warning that Ogg was incorrectly installed even though the correct
files are in the /local/include/ogg and /local/lib directories.

My MSYS and MinGW installations are clean. I un-tarred the libogg and
speex distributions to /home/audio. I configured from within
/home/audio/libogg-1.1.13 and /home/audio/speex-1.2beta2 respectively.

Do you have any ideas as to what I might be doing wrong? Unfortunately 
I'm not that familiar with this sort of environment so I could be doing 
something very silly. 8^(

I'm using the same versions as you with the exception of GCC which is
3.4.2. I'll try 3.4.5 now but I doubt that would be the problem.
> after compiling and applying of  "strip --strip-unneeded" the
sizes
> decreases to:
> 
> speexdec.exe is 104.293 bytes
> speexenc.exe is 132.109 bytes
> 
> Both tools work with no problems.
> 
> So I can send this binaries to you if you want to place it online.
> I'm sure people need it :-)
I think this would be great!

-Dennis.

On 7/24/07, Arseny Krasutsky <dtiger@mail.ru>
wrote:
> So I can send this binaries to you if you want to place it online.
> I'm sure people need it :-)
I do not know Jean-Marc's position on this -- it's his project, so I
don't want to meddle -- but if he does not oppose, I would like to put
your compiled binaries online.

Don't want people to say we don't support the Windows environment,
because even though must of us do not run Windows, we do support its
users.

-Ivo

On 7/27/07, Ivo Emanuel Gon?alves <justivo@gmail.com>
wrote:
> On 7/24/07, Arseny Krasutsky <dtiger@mail.ru> wrote:
> > So I can send this binaries to you if you want to place it online.
> > I'm sure people need it :-)
>
> I do not know Jean-Marc's position on this -- it's his project, so
I
> don't want to meddle -- but if he does not oppose, I would like to put
> your compiled binaries online.
>
> Don't want people to say we don't support the Windows environment,
> because even though must of us do not run Windows, we do support its
> users.
Jean-Marc is a very kind about Windows support. I'm working on updating
MSVC build of Speex with Jean-Marc now. I have a conversation with him
off the list, so it's hidden, but it is. I have binaries, compiled
with MSVS 2003
and I could share them too. I think we could compare the speed of mingw
and MSVC compiled version of Speex and consider it as recommended
binary. But, sure, last word should be said by Jean-Marc himself.

--
Regards,
Alexander Chemeris.

SIPez LLC.
SIP VoIP, IM and Presence Consulting
http://www.SIPez.com
tel: +1 (617) 273-4000