Georg.Biberger at partner.bmw.de
2020-Jul-01 09:37 UTC
[Samba] Issues with FLOCK on NFS Share
Smb.conf: [global] security = ADS workgroup = MUC realm = europe.bmw.corp netbios name = EDAINT netbios aliases = edaint.muc log file = /lfs/EDA/DATA/SOFTWARE/samba/var/log/samba/%m.log log level = 10 # Default ID mapping configuration for local BUILTIN accounts # and groups on a domain member. The default (*) domain: # - must not overlap with any domain ID mapping configuration! # - must use a read-write-enabled back end, such as tdb. # - Adding just this is not enough # - You must set a DOMAIN backend configuration, see below idmap config * : backend = tdb idmap config * : range = 79846-100000 idmap config MUC : backend = rid # idmap config MUC : range = 79846-500000000 template shell = /bin/bash template homedir = /home/%U winbind use default domain = true winbind offline logon = false winbind nss info = rfc2307 winbind enum users = no winbind enum groups = no server string = EDA_Archiv_Integration username map=/lfs/EDA/DATA/SOFTWARE/samba/etc/usermap follow symlinks = yes wide links = yes unix extensions = no unix charset = UTF-8 kerberos method = secrets and keytab # [test] comment = EDA Archive Test directory = /lfs/EDA/DATA/SHARES/test/%U browseable = no writable = yes directory mask = 0700 create mask = 0600 force user = qqeda11 force group = eda1 kernel share modes = no> Howdy! > > Am 6/30/20 um 2:37 PM schrieb Georg.Biberger--- via samba: >> We are using Samba 4.10.16 as a readonly file server on a linux box with SLES 12. All is working fine with our NAS NFS Shares. We are now trying to integrate new NFS Shares from an archive provider. We have some problems with samba not responding, when accessing files on these archive NFS shares. >> We have done some Samba-Debugging and found out, that the call to flock in source3/lib/system.c (kernel_flock) do not return and is blocking samba! > kernel oplocks = no>Only problem with that, it is the default setting :-(> Can we see your smb.conf ?Hi, I have now set kernel share modes = no which solves this issue! Attached my smb.conf. I was wondering if the kernel_flock function in source3/lib/system.c is correct implemented. E.g. when the function is called with parameter share_mode set to FILE_SHARE_READ|FILE_SHARE_WRITE, then the function flock is not be called. void kernel_flock(int fd, uint32_t share_mode, uint32_t access_mask) { #ifdef HAVE_KERNEL_SHARE_MODES int kernel_mode = 0; if (share_mode == FILE_SHARE_WRITE) { kernel_mode = LOCK_MAND|LOCK_WRITE; } else if (share_mode == FILE_SHARE_READ) { kernel_mode = LOCK_MAND|LOCK_READ; } else if (share_mode == FILE_SHARE_NONE) { kernel_mode = LOCK_MAND; } if (kernel_mode) { flock(fd, kernel_mode); } #endif ; } Georg -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
On 01/07/2020 10:37, Georg.Biberger--- via samba wrote:> Smb.conf: > [global] > security = ADS > workgroup = MUC > realm = europe.bmw.corp > netbios name = EDAINT > netbios aliases = edaint.muc > log file = /lfs/EDA/DATA/SOFTWARE/samba/var/log/samba/%m.log > log level = 10 > > idmap config * : backend = tdb > idmap config * : range = 79846-100000 > idmap config MUC : backend = rid > # idmap config MUC : range = 79846-500000000The 'idmap config' lines are borked, the default domain '*' lines are okay, but the 'MUC' domain lines are half correct, yes you can use the 'rid' backend, but you must set a range. You did set a range, but it was incorrect and you have commented it out. The two ranges must not overlap, but what you had before you commented it out, well, overlap would be an understatement, the '*' domain was totally inside the 'MUC' domain, you need to fix this. Rowland
Georg.Biberger at partner.bmw.de
2020-Jul-01 11:59 UTC
[Samba] Issues with FLOCK on NFS Share
>The 'idmap config' lines are borked, the default domain '*' lines are >okay, but the 'MUC' domain lines are half correct, yes you can use the >'rid' backend, but you must set a range. You did set a range, but it was >incorrect and you have commented it out. The two ranges must not >overlap, but what you had before you commented it out, well, overlap >would be an understatement, the '*' domain was totally inside the 'MUC' >domain, you need to fix this.I have the problem that all files on NFS-Shares are only accessible by the user qqeda11 (unix-id 79846). All users get mapped to qqeda11 with usermap qqeda11=*. But the user qqeda11 is also known in the MUC-Domain as windows user (muc/qqeda11 SID= S-1-5-21-43206524-2104247658-1151357142-1581344): To achieve the correct mapping, I have added a mapping to winbindd_idmap.tdb: dumping id mapping from /lfs/EDA/DATA/SOFTWARE/samba/var/locks/winbindd_idmap.tdb GID 79846 S-1-5-21-43206524-2104247658-1151357142-513 USER HWM 79846 UID 79846 S-1-5-21-43206524-2104247658-1151357142-1581344 GID 79847 S-1-1-0 GID 79848 S-1-5-2 GROUP HWM 79849 Does this correspond with your explanation of id ranges? Georg