thr3ads.net - samba - [Samba] Win7 clients problem after upgrading samba file server to 4.12 on Arch [May 2020]

If this information is useful, please help other people find it:
Share via:

pavlos

2020-May-04 20:57 UTC

[Samba] Win7 clients problem after upgrading samba file server to 4.12 on Arch

@Rowland,
Installing and changing to LTS kernel 5.4.38-1-lts doesn't help.
Downgrading samba and smbclient to 4.11.3 DOES help.

@Andrew, let me first clean up with kernel/samba versions, set log level to
10 and log limit to 0, delete all logs and repeat the whole exercise.
Please advice how to get a network capture, I am not that expert...

Regards, Pawel.

pon., 4 maj 2020 o 22:50 Andrew Bartlett <abartlet at samba.org>
napisa?(a):
> Can you get a network capture, and also ensure the logs have the exact
> time you see the failure in it (and tell us that time, to the highest
> resolution you can)?  I can't see anything suspicious, but at log level
> 10 the 'log limit = 50' will cut in very fast, so it might have
been
> lost.  Set that to 0.
>
> Andrew Bartlett
>
> On Mon, 2020-05-04 at 22:28 +0200, pavlos via samba wrote:
> > Logs are here:
> > http://www.mediafire.com/file/qqwfkf3rsuv081k/logs.tar.gz/file
> >
> > 1. I have stopped smb and nmb services,
> > 2. deleted all samba logs,
> > 3. addied 'log level - 10' to smb.conf,
> > 4. started services,
> > 5. performed few tests until some problems appeared,
> > 6. stopped smb and nmb services
> > 7. and grabbed all logs.
> > As this is test environment - nothing to sanitize. All logs
> > unchanged.
> > For better understanding:
> >
> >    - 192.168.1.103, netbios name 'saloon' - Win7x32 client
> >    - 192.168.1.108, netbios name 'attic' - win7x32 client
> >    - 192.168.1.115, hostname 'arch1' - the test Samba server,
Arch
> > Linux
> >    5.6.10-arch1-1
> >
> > Regards, Pawel.
> >
> > pon., 4 maj 2020 o 21:45 Rowland penny via samba <
> > samba at lists.samba.org>
> > napisa?(a):
> >
> > > On 04/05/2020 20:21, pavlos wrote:
> > > >
> > > > All clients are connecting either anonymously read-only
which
> > > > leverages the 'nobody' samba user, or using
'ala' user/pwd. Both
> > > > have
> > > > same problems.
> > > >
> > > > No local 'ala' users on any client machine. In
Windows login
> > > > dialog I
> > > > am supplying username as '192.168.1.115\ala' and the
defined
> > > > password
> > > > (....115 is the IP address of the test samba server).
> > >
> > > Try it without the the IP i.e. just 'ala'
> > > >
> > > > I have also put 'log level = 10' to your smb.conf,
but the hiccup
> > > > on
> > > > Win7 remains. As I said - the stupid message box in Windows
pops
> > > > up
> > > > randomly.
> > >
> > > This could be a Windows error, but something might have changed
in
> > > Samba
> > > that is now causing it.
> > > > This short exercise has produced about 100 KB of compressed
logs.
> > > > How
> > > > might I share them with you and all in the mailing list?
> > >
> > > Post them somewhere (after sanitising them) and then provide a
link
> > > to it.
> > >
> > > Rowland
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read
the
> > > instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
> > >
> --
> Andrew Bartlett                       https://samba.org/~abartlet/
> Authentication Developer, Samba Team  https://samba.org
> Samba Developer, Catalyst IT
> https://catalyst.net.nz/services/samba
>
>
>
>

Andrew Bartlett

2020-May-04 21:02 UTC

head link

[Samba] Win7 clients problem after upgrading samba file server to 4.12 on Arch

Thanks for getting back to us,

On Mon, 2020-05-04 at 22:57 +0200, pavlos via samba
wrote:> @Rowland,
> Installing and changing to LTS kernel 5.4.38-1-lts doesn't help.
> Downgrading samba and smbclient to 4.11.3 DOES help.
> 
> @Andrew, let me first clean up with kernel/samba versions, set log
> level to
> 10 and log limit to 0, delete all logs and repeat the whole exercise.
> Please advice how to get a network capture, I am not that expert...
Our standard advise on network packet capture is here:

https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Capture_Packets

Finally, as you are on a rolling distro, can you try Samba master, if
only for giggles?

Andrew Bartlett
> Regards, Pawel.
> 
> pon., 4 maj 2020 o 22:50 Andrew Bartlett <abartlet at samba.org>
> napisa?(a):
> 
> > Can you get a network capture, and also ensure the logs have the
> > exact
> > time you see the failure in it (and tell us that time, to the
> > highest
> > resolution you can)?  I can't see anything suspicious, but at log
> > level
> > 10 the 'log limit = 50' will cut in very fast, so it might
have
> > been
> > lost.  Set that to 0.
> > 
> > Andrew Bartlett
> > 
> > On Mon, 2020-05-04 at 22:28 +0200, pavlos via samba wrote:
> > > Logs are here:
> > > http://www.mediafire.com/file/qqwfkf3rsuv081k/logs.tar.gz/file
> > > 
> > > 1. I have stopped smb and nmb services,
> > > 2. deleted all samba logs,
> > > 3. addied 'log level - 10' to smb.conf,
> > > 4. started services,
> > > 5. performed few tests until some problems appeared,
> > > 6. stopped smb and nmb services
> > > 7. and grabbed all logs.
> > > As this is test environment - nothing to sanitize. All logs
> > > unchanged.
> > > For better understanding:
> > > 
> > >    - 192.168.1.103, netbios name 'saloon' - Win7x32
client
> > >    - 192.168.1.108, netbios name 'attic' - win7x32 client
> > >    - 192.168.1.115, hostname 'arch1' - the test Samba
server,
> > > Arch
> > > Linux
> > >    5.6.10-arch1-1
> > > 
> > > Regards, Pawel.
> > > 
> > > pon., 4 maj 2020 o 21:45 Rowland penny via samba <
> > > samba at lists.samba.org>
> > > napisa?(a):
> > > 
> > > > On 04/05/2020 20:21, pavlos wrote:
> > > > > 
> > > > > All clients are connecting either anonymously read-only
which
> > > > > leverages the 'nobody' samba user, or using
'ala' user/pwd.
> > > > > Both
> > > > > have
> > > > > same problems.
> > > > > 
> > > > > No local 'ala' users on any client machine. In
Windows login
> > > > > dialog I
> > > > > am supplying username as '192.168.1.115\ala'
and the defined
> > > > > password
> > > > > (....115 is the IP address of the test samba server).
> > > > 
> > > > Try it without the the IP i.e. just 'ala'
> > > > > 
> > > > > I have also put 'log level = 10' to your
smb.conf, but the
> > > > > hiccup
> > > > > on
> > > > > Win7 remains. As I said - the stupid message box in
Windows
> > > > > pops
> > > > > up
> > > > > randomly.
> > > > 
> > > > This could be a Windows error, but something might have
changed
> > > > in
> > > > Samba
> > > > that is now causing it.
> > > > > This short exercise has produced about 100 KB of
compressed
> > > > > logs.
> > > > > How
> > > > > might I share them with you and all in the mailing
list?
> > > > 
> > > > Post them somewhere (after sanitising them) and then provide
a
> > > > link
> > > > to it.
> > > > 
> > > > Rowland
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > --
> > > > To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and
read
> > > > the
> > > > instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
> > > > 
> > 
> > --
> > Andrew Bartlett                       https://samba.org/~abartlet/
> > Authentication Developer, Samba Team  https://samba.org
> > Samba Developer, Catalyst IT
> > https://catalyst.net.nz/services/samba
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > -- 
Andrew Bartlett                       https://samba.org/~abartlet/
Authentication Developer, Samba Team  https://samba.org
Samba Developer, Catalyst IT          
https://catalyst.net.nz/services/samba

pavlos

2020-May-04 21:18 UTC

head link

[Samba] Win7 clients problem after upgrading samba file server to 4.12 on Arch

@Andrew,

Samba master - what do you mean? A clean compile and install from genuine
samba.org sources? As a matter of fact, I was thinking about it....

Let me do the tests now, with tcpdump. Will send some logs and outputs
later on.

You've asked previously - this is the smbstatus, already on the latest
kernel/samba versions.
The problem is persistent, no wonder...

[root at arch1 /]# LC_ALL=C smbstatus

Samba version 4.12.2
PID     Username     Group        Machine
                                  Protocol Version  Encryption
          Signing
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

386     nobody       nobody       192.168.1.103 (ipv4:192.168.1.103:59926)
 SMB2_10           -                    -
369     ala          users        192.168.1.108 (ipv4:192.168.1.108:50063)
 SMB2_10           -                    -

Service      pid     Machine       Connected at
                    Encryption   Signing
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

nas          386     192.168.1.103 Mon May  4 23:05:16 2020 CEST    -
           -
nas          369     192.168.1.108 Mon May  4 23:03:42 2020 CEST    -
           -

Locked files:
Pid          User(ID)   DenyMode   Access      R/W        Oplock
          SharePath   Name   Time
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

386          65534      DENY_ALL   0x100080    RDONLY     NONE
            /nas   .   Mon May  4 23:05:16 2020
369          1000       DENY_NONE  0x100081    RDONLY     NONE
            /nas   .   Mon May  4 23:04:49 2020


Pawel.

pon., 4 maj 2020 o 23:03 Andrew Bartlett <abartlet at samba.org>
napisa?(a):
> Thanks for getting back to us,
>
> On Mon, 2020-05-04 at 22:57 +0200, pavlos via samba wrote:
> > @Rowland,
> > Installing and changing to LTS kernel 5.4.38-1-lts doesn't help.
> > Downgrading samba and smbclient to 4.11.3 DOES help.
> >
> > @Andrew, let me first clean up with kernel/samba versions, set log
> > level to
> > 10 and log limit to 0, delete all logs and repeat the whole exercise.
> > Please advice how to get a network capture, I am not that expert...
>
> Our standard advise on network packet capture is here:
>
> https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Capture_Packets
>
> Finally, as you are on a rolling distro, can you try Samba master, if
> only for giggles?
>
> Andrew Bartlett
>
> > Regards, Pawel.
> >
> > pon., 4 maj 2020 o 22:50 Andrew Bartlett <abartlet at samba.org>
> > napisa?(a):
> >
> > > Can you get a network capture, and also ensure the logs have the
> > > exact
> > > time you see the failure in it (and tell us that time, to the
> > > highest
> > > resolution you can)?  I can't see anything suspicious, but at
log
> > > level
> > > 10 the 'log limit = 50' will cut in very fast, so it
might have
> > > been
> > > lost.  Set that to 0.
> > >
> > > Andrew Bartlett
> > >
> > > On Mon, 2020-05-04 at 22:28 +0200, pavlos via samba wrote:
> > > > Logs are here:
> > > >
http://www.mediafire.com/file/qqwfkf3rsuv081k/logs.tar.gz/file
> > > >
> > > > 1. I have stopped smb and nmb services,
> > > > 2. deleted all samba logs,
> > > > 3. addied 'log level - 10' to smb.conf,
> > > > 4. started services,
> > > > 5. performed few tests until some problems appeared,
> > > > 6. stopped smb and nmb services
> > > > 7. and grabbed all logs.
> > > > As this is test environment - nothing to sanitize. All logs
> > > > unchanged.
> > > > For better understanding:
> > > >
> > > >    - 192.168.1.103, netbios name 'saloon' - Win7x32
client
> > > >    - 192.168.1.108, netbios name 'attic' - win7x32
client
> > > >    - 192.168.1.115, hostname 'arch1' - the test
Samba server,
> > > > Arch
> > > > Linux
> > > >    5.6.10-arch1-1
> > > >
> > > > Regards, Pawel.
> > > >
> > > > pon., 4 maj 2020 o 21:45 Rowland penny via samba <
> > > > samba at lists.samba.org>
> > > > napisa?(a):
> > > >
> > > > > On 04/05/2020 20:21, pavlos wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > All clients are connecting either anonymously
read-only which
> > > > > > leverages the 'nobody' samba user, or
using 'ala' user/pwd.
> > > > > > Both
> > > > > > have
> > > > > > same problems.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > No local 'ala' users on any client
machine. In Windows login
> > > > > > dialog I
> > > > > > am supplying username as
'192.168.1.115\ala' and the defined
> > > > > > password
> > > > > > (....115 is the IP address of the test samba
server).
> > > > >
> > > > > Try it without the the IP i.e. just 'ala'
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I have also put 'log level = 10' to your
smb.conf, but the
> > > > > > hiccup
> > > > > > on
> > > > > > Win7 remains. As I said - the stupid message box
in Windows
> > > > > > pops
> > > > > > up
> > > > > > randomly.
> > > > >
> > > > > This could be a Windows error, but something might have
changed
> > > > > in
> > > > > Samba
> > > > > that is now causing it.
> > > > > > This short exercise has produced about 100 KB of
compressed
> > > > > > logs.
> > > > > > How
> > > > > > might I share them with you and all in the mailing
list?
> > > > >
> > > > > Post them somewhere (after sanitising them) and then
provide a
> > > > > link
> > > > > to it.
> > > > >
> > > > > Rowland
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL
and read
> > > > > the
> > > > > instructions: 
https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
> > > > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Andrew Bartlett                      
https://samba.org/~abartlet/
> > > Authentication Developer, Samba Team  https://samba.org
> > > Samba Developer, Catalyst IT
> > > https://catalyst.net.nz/services/samba
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> --
> Andrew Bartlett                       https://samba.org/~abartlet/
> Authentication Developer, Samba Team  https://samba.org
> Samba Developer, Catalyst IT
> https://catalyst.net.nz/services/samba
>
>
>
>

Possibly Parallel Threads

Search for more possibly parallel threads

samba - May 2020 - Win7 clients problem after upgrading samba file server to 4.12 on Arch

[Samba] Win7 clients problem after upgrading samba file server to 4.12 on Arch

[Samba] Win7 clients problem after upgrading samba file server to 4.12 on Arch

[Samba] Win7 clients problem after upgrading samba file server to 4.12 on Arch

Possibly Parallel Threads