samba - May 2016 - Regression: The 'net' command is now failing to login (UNKNOWN ENUM VALUE 1003?)

On Thu, May 26, 2016 at 1:56 PM, pisymbol . <pisymbol at gmail.com>
wrote:
> On Thu, May 26, 2016 at 7:56 AM, mathias dufresne <infractory at
gmail.com> wrote:
> We are trying to just list shares and a lot of scripts use the 'net
> share' command which is now barfing.
I believe I am running into a flavor of this:

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11849

But basically the smbclient and net commands are completely broken
when connecting to a NetApp now (I am trying to dump the shares
exported).

FWIW: This worked for years before the recent set of security patches.

-aps

Is the netapp a member of the domain? My assumption is that you can have 
domain members that are patched with domain controllers that are not.

On 05/27/16 15:44, pisymbol . wrote:
> On Thu, May 26, 2016 at 1:56 PM, pisymbol . <pisymbol at gmail.com>
wrote:
>> On Thu, May 26, 2016 at 7:56 AM, mathias dufresne <infractory at
gmail.com> wrote:
>> We are trying to just list shares and a lot of scripts use the 'net
>> share' command which is now barfing.
> I believe I am running into a flavor of this:
>
> https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11849
>
> But basically the smbclient and net commands are completely broken
> when connecting to a NetApp now (I am trying to dump the shares
> exported).
>
> FWIW: This worked for years before the recent set of security patches.
>
> -aps
>

On Fri, May 27, 2016 at 3:55 PM, Gaiseric Vandal
<gaiseric.vandal at gmail.com> wrote:
> Is the netapp a member of the domain?
Yes.
> My assumption is that you can have domain members that are patched with
domain controllers that are not.
I don't know what you mean by that. This worked before the samba CVE
changes took effect in the latest samba3 RPMs distributed by the
CentOS team.

It certainly feels like regression.

-aps