On advice/recommendation received on this list, I removed version 1.0.15 with: rm -rf /usr/local/dovecot However, now that I have version 2 properly installed, configured, and ready to start testing with Postfix, it appears the old version is still in /usr/local/sbin, /usr/local/include, /usr/local/libexec, /usr/local/lib and /usr/local/shared/doc. Thinking that anything in /usr/local is something that was installed s a result of having built it from source (which 1.0.15 definitely was), should these also be removed?
Have you done *make distclean* in prior? That should remove all things dovecot. On 12 June 2015 at 15:10, Steve Matzura <number6 at noisynotes.com> wrote:> On advice/recommendation received on this list, I removed version > 1.0.15 with: > > rm -rf /usr/local/dovecot > > However, now that I have version 2 properly installed, configured, and > ready to start testing with Postfix, it appears the old version is > still in /usr/local/sbin, /usr/local/include, /usr/local/libexec, > /usr/local/lib and /usr/local/shared/doc. Thinking that anything in > /usr/local is something that was installed s a result of having built > it from source (which 1.0.15 definitely was), should these also be > removed? >
I mean, in the source directory. On 12 June 2015 at 15:13, Muzaffer Tolga Ozses <tolga at ozses.net> wrote:> Have you done *make distclean* in prior? That should remove all things > dovecot. > > On 12 June 2015 at 15:10, Steve Matzura <number6 at noisynotes.com> wrote: > >> On advice/recommendation received on this list, I removed version >> 1.0.15 with: >> >> rm -rf /usr/local/dovecot >> >> However, now that I have version 2 properly installed, configured, and >> ready to start testing with Postfix, it appears the old version is >> still in /usr/local/sbin, /usr/local/include, /usr/local/libexec, >> /usr/local/lib and /usr/local/shared/doc. Thinking that anything in >> /usr/local is something that was installed s a result of having built >> it from source (which 1.0.15 definitely was), should these also be >> removed? >> > >
*make clean* then? On 12 June 2015 at 15:52, Steve Matzura <number6 at noisynotes.com> wrote:> On Fri, 12 Jun 2015 15:13:18 +0300, you wrote: > > >Have you done *make distclean* in prior? That should remove all things > >dovecot. > > I tried, but got: > > make: *** No target to make `distclean'. Stop. >
On Fri, 12 Jun 2015 15:13:18 +0300, you wrote:>Have you done *make distclean* in prior? That should remove all things >dovecot.No, because I didn't know about that one. I'll do that forthwith, and thanks.>On 12 June 2015 at 15:10, Steve Matzura <number6 at noisynotes.com> wrote: > >> On advice/recommendation received on this list, I removed version >> 1.0.15 with: >> >> rm -rf /usr/local/dovecot >> >> However, now that I have version 2 properly installed, configured, and >> ready to start testing with Postfix, it appears the old version is >> still in /usr/local/sbin, /usr/local/include, /usr/local/libexec, >> /usr/local/lib and /usr/local/shared/doc. Thinking that anything in >> /usr/local is something that was installed s a result of having built >> it from source (which 1.0.15 definitely was), should these also be >> removed? >>