Le 30/09/2019 ? 17:53, Gwaland a ?crit?:> looks like it was updated due to a segfault. > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1750550 > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1253662Now I'm even more puzzled. Fedora and EPEL sport SquidGuard 1.4.36. Now when you search for "squidguard", this seems to be the project site: * http://squidguard.org/index.html This page hasn't been updated in ages and sports the "NEW" version 1.3. So apparently the project has been developed somewhere under the radar. Niki -- Microlinux - Solutions informatiques durables 7, place de l'?glise - 30730 Montpezat Site : https://www.microlinux.fr Mail : info at microlinux.fr T?l. : 04 66 63 10 32 Mob. : 06 51 80 12 12
On Mon, Sep 30, 2019 at 10:26 PM Nicolas Kovacs <info at microlinux.fr> wrote:> Le 30/09/2019 ? 17:53, Gwaland a ?crit : > > looks like it was updated due to a segfault. > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1750550 > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1253662 > > Now I'm even more puzzled. > > Fedora and EPEL sport SquidGuard 1.4.36. > > Now when you search for "squidguard", this seems to be the project site: > > * http://squidguard.org/index.html > > This page hasn't been updated in ages and sports the "NEW" version 1.3. > > So apparently the project has been developed somewhere under the radar. > > > huh, wikipedia says 1.4 came out in Jan 2009, over 10 years ago. yet itsays thats the official site... debian has squidguard 1.5-5 https://packages.debian.org/source/stretch/squidguard whoa, I even found a reference to a 1.5 source tar..gz on the squidguard site, but its 404, the same directory only has 1.2 and 1.3. I wonder if they got knocked offline and had to restore an archive or something. seems to be a mess. -- -john r pierce recycling used bits in santa cruz
On Mon, Sep 30, 2019 at 11:47:02PM -0700, John Pierce wrote: ...> > > > Now when you search for "squidguard", this seems to be the project site: > > > > * http://squidguard.org/index.html > > > > This page hasn't been updated in ages and sports the "NEW" version 1.3. > > > > So apparently the project has been developed somewhere under the radar. > > > > > > huh, wikipedia says 1.4 came out in Jan 2009, over 10 years ago. yet it > says thats the official site... > > debian has squidguard 1.5-5 > https://packages.debian.org/source/stretch/squidguardhttps://tracker.debian.org/pkg/squidguard 1.6.0 as of today :D just my 2 cents Tru -- Tru Huynh http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xBEFA581B -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 198 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20191001/f0148d61/attachment-0002.sig>
On Mon, 30 Sep, 2019 at 23:47:02 -0700, John Pierce wrote:> On Mon, Sep 30, 2019 at 10:26 PM Nicolas Kovacs <info at microlinux.fr> wrote: > > > Le 30/09/2019 ? 17:53, Gwaland a ?crit : > > > looks like it was updated due to a segfault. > > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1750550 > > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1253662 > > > > Now I'm even more puzzled. > > > > Fedora and EPEL sport SquidGuard 1.4.36. > > > > Now when you search for "squidguard", this seems to be the project site: > > > > * http://squidguard.org/index.html > > > > This page hasn't been updated in ages and sports the "NEW" version 1.3. > > > > So apparently the project has been developed somewhere under the radar. > > > > > > huh, wikipedia says 1.4 came out in Jan 2009, over 10 years ago. yet it > says thats the official site... > > debian has squidguard 1.5-5 > https://packages.debian.org/source/stretch/squidguard[...] FWIW, the current release has squidguard 1.6 https://packages.debian.org/source/stable/squidguard