On Mon, Jan 05, 2015 at 10:37:46AM -0600, Johnny Hughes wrote:> 2. If someone comes up with a place to get said data, THEN we could > properly publish that data in some way.It would be a hack, but you could probably subscribe an automated account to the enterprise-watch-list mailing list: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/enterprise-watch-list or parse the archives here: https://www.redhat.com/archives/enterprise-watch-list/ -- Jonathan Billings <billings at negate.org>
On 2015-01-05, Jonathan Billings <billings at negate.org> wrote:> On Mon, Jan 05, 2015 at 10:37:46AM -0600, Johnny Hughes wrote: >> 2. If someone comes up with a place to get said data, THEN we could >> properly publish that data in some way. > > It would be a hack, but you could probably subscribe an automated > account to the enterprise-watch-list mailing list: > > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/enterprise-watch-list > > or parse the archives here: > https://www.redhat.com/archives/enterprise-watch-list/You could subscribe an address, but based on the link to RH's terms that Johnny posted it may still violate the TOU to redistribute the contents of the messages the bot received. --keith -- kkeller at wombat.san-francisco.ca.us
Somers-Harris, David | David | OPS
2015-Jan-13 03:25 UTC
[CentOS] When will CentOS Publish Errata?
> On 2015-01-06, Keith Keller wrote: >> On Mon, Jan 05, 2015 at 10:37:46AM -0600, Johnny Hughes wrote: >>> 2. If someone comes up with a place to get said data, THEN we could >>> properly publish that data in some way. >> >> It would be a hack, but you could probably subscribe an automated >> account to the enterprise-watch-list mailing list: >> >> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/enterprise-watch-list >> >> or parse the archives here: >> https://www.redhat.com/archives/enterprise-watch-list/ > >You could subscribe an address, but based on the link to RH's terms that Johnny posted it may still violate the >TOU to redistribute the contents of the messages the bot received.I heard that this is actually how the RHEL errata have been put together, and that it would not be a violation of the ToU to use the info in the emails. Can somebody confirm this? Sounds to me like this would be the way to go.