Christian Borntraeger
2020-Apr-01 12:56 UTC
[PATCH V9 1/9] vhost: refine vhost and vringh kconfig
On 01.04.20 14:50, Jason Wang wrote:> > On 2020/4/1 ??7:21, Christian Borntraeger wrote: >> On 26.03.20 15:01, Jason Wang wrote: >>> Currently, CONFIG_VHOST depends on CONFIG_VIRTUALIZATION. But vhost is >>> not necessarily for VM since it's a generic userspace and kernel >>> communication protocol. Such dependency may prevent archs without >>> virtualization support from using vhost. >>> >>> To solve this, a dedicated vhost menu is created under drivers so >>> CONIFG_VHOST can be decoupled out of CONFIG_VIRTUALIZATION. >> FWIW, this now results in vhost not being build with defconfig kernels (in todays >> linux-next). >> > > Hi Christian: > > Did you meet it even with this commit?https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git/commit/?id=a4be40cbcedba9b5b714f3c95182e8a45176e42d?I simply used linux-next. The defconfig does NOT contain CONFIG_VHOST and therefore CONFIG_VHOST_NET and friends can not be selected. $ git checkout next-20200401 $ make defconfig HOSTCC scripts/basic/fixdep HOSTCC scripts/kconfig/conf.o HOSTCC scripts/kconfig/confdata.o HOSTCC scripts/kconfig/expr.o LEX scripts/kconfig/lexer.lex.c YACC scripts/kconfig/parser.tab.[ch] HOSTCC scripts/kconfig/lexer.lex.o HOSTCC scripts/kconfig/parser.tab.o HOSTCC scripts/kconfig/preprocess.o HOSTCC scripts/kconfig/symbol.o HOSTCC scripts/kconfig/util.o HOSTLD scripts/kconfig/conf *** Default configuration is based on 'x86_64_defconfig' # # configuration written to .config # $ grep VHOST .config # CONFIG_VHOST is not set> If yes, what's your build config looks like? > > Thanks >
Christian Borntraeger
2020-Apr-01 13:02 UTC
[PATCH V9 1/9] vhost: refine vhost and vringh kconfig
On 01.04.20 14:56, Christian Borntraeger wrote:> > On 01.04.20 14:50, Jason Wang wrote: >> >> On 2020/4/1 ??7:21, Christian Borntraeger wrote: >>> On 26.03.20 15:01, Jason Wang wrote: >>>> Currently, CONFIG_VHOST depends on CONFIG_VIRTUALIZATION. But vhost is >>>> not necessarily for VM since it's a generic userspace and kernel >>>> communication protocol. Such dependency may prevent archs without >>>> virtualization support from using vhost. >>>> >>>> To solve this, a dedicated vhost menu is created under drivers so >>>> CONIFG_VHOST can be decoupled out of CONFIG_VIRTUALIZATION. >>> FWIW, this now results in vhost not being build with defconfig kernels (in todays >>> linux-next). >>> >> >> Hi Christian: >> >> Did you meet it even with this commit?https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git/commit/?id=a4be40cbcedba9b5b714f3c95182e8a45176e42d? > > I simply used linux-next. The defconfig does NOT contain CONFIG_VHOST and therefore CONFIG_VHOST_NET and friends > can not be selected. > > $ git checkout next-20200401 > $ make defconfig > HOSTCC scripts/basic/fixdep > HOSTCC scripts/kconfig/conf.o > HOSTCC scripts/kconfig/confdata.o > HOSTCC scripts/kconfig/expr.o > LEX scripts/kconfig/lexer.lex.c > YACC scripts/kconfig/parser.tab.[ch] > HOSTCC scripts/kconfig/lexer.lex.o > HOSTCC scripts/kconfig/parser.tab.o > HOSTCC scripts/kconfig/preprocess.o > HOSTCC scripts/kconfig/symbol.o > HOSTCC scripts/kconfig/util.o > HOSTLD scripts/kconfig/conf > *** Default configuration is based on 'x86_64_defconfig' > # > # configuration written to .config > # > > $ grep VHOST .config > # CONFIG_VHOST is not set > > >> If yes, what's your build config looks like? >> >> ThanksThis was x86. Not sure if that did work before. On s390 this is definitely a regression as the defconfig files for s390 do select VHOST_NET grep VHOST arch/s390/configs/* arch/s390/configs/debug_defconfig:CONFIG_VHOST_NET=m arch/s390/configs/debug_defconfig:CONFIG_VHOST_VSOCK=m arch/s390/configs/defconfig:CONFIG_VHOST_NET=m arch/s390/configs/defconfig:CONFIG_VHOST_VSOCK=m and this worked with 5.6, but does not work with next. Just adding CONFIG_VHOST=m to the defconfig solves the issue, something like --- arch/s390/configs/debug_defconfig | 5 +++-- arch/s390/configs/defconfig | 5 +++-- 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/s390/configs/debug_defconfig b/arch/s390/configs/debug_defconfig index 46038bc58c9e..0b83274341ce 100644 --- a/arch/s390/configs/debug_defconfig +++ b/arch/s390/configs/debug_defconfig @@ -57,8 +57,6 @@ CONFIG_PROTECTED_VIRTUALIZATION_GUEST=y CONFIG_CMM=m CONFIG_APPLDATA_BASE=y CONFIG_KVM=m -CONFIG_VHOST_NET=m -CONFIG_VHOST_VSOCK=m CONFIG_OPROFILE=m CONFIG_KPROBES=y CONFIG_JUMP_LABEL=y @@ -561,6 +559,9 @@ CONFIG_VFIO_MDEV_DEVICE=m CONFIG_VIRTIO_PCI=m CONFIG_VIRTIO_BALLOON=m CONFIG_VIRTIO_INPUT=y +CONFIG_VHOST=m +CONFIG_VHOST_NET=m +CONFIG_VHOST_VSOCK=m CONFIG_S390_CCW_IOMMU=y CONFIG_S390_AP_IOMMU=y CONFIG_EXT4_FS=y diff --git a/arch/s390/configs/defconfig b/arch/s390/configs/defconfig index 7cd0648c1f4e..39e69c4e8cf7 100644 --- a/arch/s390/configs/defconfig +++ b/arch/s390/configs/defconfig @@ -57,8 +57,6 @@ CONFIG_PROTECTED_VIRTUALIZATION_GUEST=y CONFIG_CMM=m CONFIG_APPLDATA_BASE=y CONFIG_KVM=m -CONFIG_VHOST_NET=m -CONFIG_VHOST_VSOCK=m CONFIG_OPROFILE=m CONFIG_KPROBES=y CONFIG_JUMP_LABEL=y @@ -557,6 +555,9 @@ CONFIG_VFIO_MDEV_DEVICE=m CONFIG_VIRTIO_PCI=m CONFIG_VIRTIO_BALLOON=m CONFIG_VIRTIO_INPUT=y +CONFIG_VHOST=m +CONFIG_VHOST_NET=m +CONFIG_VHOST_VSOCK=m CONFIG_S390_CCW_IOMMU=y CONFIG_S390_AP_IOMMU=y CONFIG_EXT4_FS=y -- 2.25.1
Michael S. Tsirkin
2020-Apr-01 14:01 UTC
[PATCH V9 1/9] vhost: refine vhost and vringh kconfig
On Wed, Apr 01, 2020 at 03:02:00PM +0200, Christian Borntraeger wrote:> > > On 01.04.20 14:56, Christian Borntraeger wrote: > > > > On 01.04.20 14:50, Jason Wang wrote: > >> > >> On 2020/4/1 ??7:21, Christian Borntraeger wrote: > >>> On 26.03.20 15:01, Jason Wang wrote: > >>>> Currently, CONFIG_VHOST depends on CONFIG_VIRTUALIZATION. But vhost is > >>>> not necessarily for VM since it's a generic userspace and kernel > >>>> communication protocol. Such dependency may prevent archs without > >>>> virtualization support from using vhost. > >>>> > >>>> To solve this, a dedicated vhost menu is created under drivers so > >>>> CONIFG_VHOST can be decoupled out of CONFIG_VIRTUALIZATION. > >>> FWIW, this now results in vhost not being build with defconfig kernels (in todays > >>> linux-next). > >>> > >> > >> Hi Christian: > >> > >> Did you meet it even with this commit?https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git/commit/?id=a4be40cbcedba9b5b714f3c95182e8a45176e42d? > > > > I simply used linux-next. The defconfig does NOT contain CONFIG_VHOST and therefore CONFIG_VHOST_NET and friends > > can not be selected. > > > > $ git checkout next-20200401 > > $ make defconfig > > HOSTCC scripts/basic/fixdep > > HOSTCC scripts/kconfig/conf.o > > HOSTCC scripts/kconfig/confdata.o > > HOSTCC scripts/kconfig/expr.o > > LEX scripts/kconfig/lexer.lex.c > > YACC scripts/kconfig/parser.tab.[ch] > > HOSTCC scripts/kconfig/lexer.lex.o > > HOSTCC scripts/kconfig/parser.tab.o > > HOSTCC scripts/kconfig/preprocess.o > > HOSTCC scripts/kconfig/symbol.o > > HOSTCC scripts/kconfig/util.o > > HOSTLD scripts/kconfig/conf > > *** Default configuration is based on 'x86_64_defconfig' > > # > > # configuration written to .config > > # > > > > $ grep VHOST .config > > # CONFIG_VHOST is not set > > > > > >> If yes, what's your build config looks like? > >> > >> Thanks > > This was x86. Not sure if that did work before. > On s390 this is definitely a regression as the defconfig files > for s390 do select VHOST_NET > > grep VHOST arch/s390/configs/* > arch/s390/configs/debug_defconfig:CONFIG_VHOST_NET=m > arch/s390/configs/debug_defconfig:CONFIG_VHOST_VSOCK=m > arch/s390/configs/defconfig:CONFIG_VHOST_NET=m > arch/s390/configs/defconfig:CONFIG_VHOST_VSOCK=m > > and this worked with 5.6, but does not work with next. Just adding > CONFIG_VHOST=m to the defconfig solves the issue, something likeAnd a bunch of other places I guess... and I guess we need to select VHOST_RING too? Also Jason, I just noticed that you added: config VHOST_RING tristate + select VHOST_IOTLB help This option is selected by any driver which needs to access the host side of a virtio ring. but are you sure this will do the right thing if VHOST_RING itself selected?> --- > arch/s390/configs/debug_defconfig | 5 +++-- > arch/s390/configs/defconfig | 5 +++-- > 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/arch/s390/configs/debug_defconfig b/arch/s390/configs/debug_defconfig > index 46038bc58c9e..0b83274341ce 100644 > --- a/arch/s390/configs/debug_defconfig > +++ b/arch/s390/configs/debug_defconfig > @@ -57,8 +57,6 @@ CONFIG_PROTECTED_VIRTUALIZATION_GUEST=y > CONFIG_CMM=m > CONFIG_APPLDATA_BASE=y > CONFIG_KVM=m > -CONFIG_VHOST_NET=m > -CONFIG_VHOST_VSOCK=m > CONFIG_OPROFILE=m > CONFIG_KPROBES=y > CONFIG_JUMP_LABEL=y > @@ -561,6 +559,9 @@ CONFIG_VFIO_MDEV_DEVICE=m > CONFIG_VIRTIO_PCI=m > CONFIG_VIRTIO_BALLOON=m > CONFIG_VIRTIO_INPUT=y > +CONFIG_VHOST=m > +CONFIG_VHOST_NET=m > +CONFIG_VHOST_VSOCK=m > CONFIG_S390_CCW_IOMMU=y > CONFIG_S390_AP_IOMMU=y > CONFIG_EXT4_FS=y > diff --git a/arch/s390/configs/defconfig b/arch/s390/configs/defconfig > index 7cd0648c1f4e..39e69c4e8cf7 100644 > --- a/arch/s390/configs/defconfig > +++ b/arch/s390/configs/defconfig > @@ -57,8 +57,6 @@ CONFIG_PROTECTED_VIRTUALIZATION_GUEST=y > CONFIG_CMM=m > CONFIG_APPLDATA_BASE=y > CONFIG_KVM=m > -CONFIG_VHOST_NET=m > -CONFIG_VHOST_VSOCK=m > CONFIG_OPROFILE=m > CONFIG_KPROBES=y > CONFIG_JUMP_LABEL=y > @@ -557,6 +555,9 @@ CONFIG_VFIO_MDEV_DEVICE=m > CONFIG_VIRTIO_PCI=m > CONFIG_VIRTIO_BALLOON=m > CONFIG_VIRTIO_INPUT=y > +CONFIG_VHOST=m > +CONFIG_VHOST_NET=m > +CONFIG_VHOST_VSOCK=m > CONFIG_S390_CCW_IOMMU=y > CONFIG_S390_AP_IOMMU=y > CONFIG_EXT4_FS=y > -- > 2.25.1
On 2020/4/1 ??9:02, Christian Borntraeger wrote:> > On 01.04.20 14:56, Christian Borntraeger wrote: >> On 01.04.20 14:50, Jason Wang wrote: >>> On 2020/4/1 ??7:21, Christian Borntraeger wrote: >>>> On 26.03.20 15:01, Jason Wang wrote: >>>>> Currently, CONFIG_VHOST depends on CONFIG_VIRTUALIZATION. But vhost is >>>>> not necessarily for VM since it's a generic userspace and kernel >>>>> communication protocol. Such dependency may prevent archs without >>>>> virtualization support from using vhost. >>>>> >>>>> To solve this, a dedicated vhost menu is created under drivers so >>>>> CONIFG_VHOST can be decoupled out of CONFIG_VIRTUALIZATION. >>>> FWIW, this now results in vhost not being build with defconfig kernels (in todays >>>> linux-next). >>>> >>> Hi Christian: >>> >>> Did you meet it even with this commit?https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git/commit/?id=a4be40cbcedba9b5b714f3c95182e8a45176e42d? >> I simply used linux-next. The defconfig does NOT contain CONFIG_VHOST and therefore CONFIG_VHOST_NET and friends >> can not be selected. >> >> $ git checkout next-20200401 >> $ make defconfig >> HOSTCC scripts/basic/fixdep >> HOSTCC scripts/kconfig/conf.o >> HOSTCC scripts/kconfig/confdata.o >> HOSTCC scripts/kconfig/expr.o >> LEX scripts/kconfig/lexer.lex.c >> YACC scripts/kconfig/parser.tab.[ch] >> HOSTCC scripts/kconfig/lexer.lex.o >> HOSTCC scripts/kconfig/parser.tab.o >> HOSTCC scripts/kconfig/preprocess.o >> HOSTCC scripts/kconfig/symbol.o >> HOSTCC scripts/kconfig/util.o >> HOSTLD scripts/kconfig/conf >> *** Default configuration is based on 'x86_64_defconfig' >> # >> # configuration written to .config >> # >> >> $ grep VHOST .config >> # CONFIG_VHOST is not set >> >> >>> If yes, what's your build config looks like? >>> >>> Thanks > This was x86. Not sure if that did work before. > On s390 this is definitely a regression as the defconfig files > for s390 do select VHOST_NET > > grep VHOST arch/s390/configs/* > arch/s390/configs/debug_defconfig:CONFIG_VHOST_NET=m > arch/s390/configs/debug_defconfig:CONFIG_VHOST_VSOCK=m > arch/s390/configs/defconfig:CONFIG_VHOST_NET=m > arch/s390/configs/defconfig:CONFIG_VHOST_VSOCK=m > > and this worked with 5.6, but does not work with next. Just adding > CONFIG_VHOST=m to the defconfig solves the issue, something likeRight, I think we probably need 1) add CONFIG_VHOST=m to all defconfigs that enables CONFIG_VHOST_NET/VSOCK/SCSI. or 2) don't use menuconfig for CONFIG_VHOST, let NET/SCSI/VDPA just select it. Thanks> > --- > arch/s390/configs/debug_defconfig | 5 +++-- > arch/s390/configs/defconfig | 5 +++-- > 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/arch/s390/configs/debug_defconfig b/arch/s390/configs/debug_defconfig > index 46038bc58c9e..0b83274341ce 100644 > --- a/arch/s390/configs/debug_defconfig > +++ b/arch/s390/configs/debug_defconfig > @@ -57,8 +57,6 @@ CONFIG_PROTECTED_VIRTUALIZATION_GUEST=y > CONFIG_CMM=m > CONFIG_APPLDATA_BASE=y > CONFIG_KVM=m > -CONFIG_VHOST_NET=m > -CONFIG_VHOST_VSOCK=m > CONFIG_OPROFILE=m > CONFIG_KPROBES=y > CONFIG_JUMP_LABEL=y > @@ -561,6 +559,9 @@ CONFIG_VFIO_MDEV_DEVICE=m > CONFIG_VIRTIO_PCI=m > CONFIG_VIRTIO_BALLOON=m > CONFIG_VIRTIO_INPUT=y > +CONFIG_VHOST=m > +CONFIG_VHOST_NET=m > +CONFIG_VHOST_VSOCK=m > CONFIG_S390_CCW_IOMMU=y > CONFIG_S390_AP_IOMMU=y > CONFIG_EXT4_FS=y > diff --git a/arch/s390/configs/defconfig b/arch/s390/configs/defconfig > index 7cd0648c1f4e..39e69c4e8cf7 100644 > --- a/arch/s390/configs/defconfig > +++ b/arch/s390/configs/defconfig > @@ -57,8 +57,6 @@ CONFIG_PROTECTED_VIRTUALIZATION_GUEST=y > CONFIG_CMM=m > CONFIG_APPLDATA_BASE=y > CONFIG_KVM=m > -CONFIG_VHOST_NET=m > -CONFIG_VHOST_VSOCK=m > CONFIG_OPROFILE=m > CONFIG_KPROBES=y > CONFIG_JUMP_LABEL=y > @@ -557,6 +555,9 @@ CONFIG_VFIO_MDEV_DEVICE=m > CONFIG_VIRTIO_PCI=m > CONFIG_VIRTIO_BALLOON=m > CONFIG_VIRTIO_INPUT=y > +CONFIG_VHOST=m > +CONFIG_VHOST_NET=m > +CONFIG_VHOST_VSOCK=m > CONFIG_S390_CCW_IOMMU=y > CONFIG_S390_AP_IOMMU=y > CONFIG_EXT4_FS=y
Seemingly Similar Threads
- [PATCH V9 1/9] vhost: refine vhost and vringh kconfig
- [PATCH V9 1/9] vhost: refine vhost and vringh kconfig
- [PATCH V9 1/9] vhost: refine vhost and vringh kconfig
- [PATCH V9 1/9] vhost: refine vhost and vringh kconfig
- [PATCH V9 1/9] vhost: refine vhost and vringh kconfig