To whom it may concern, I work for a company wolfSSL .Inc. Over the summer some of our engineers have worked to build openSSH with wolfSSL instead of openSSL as we were tired of constant security issues needing patched due to openSSL compilation. As a result of the efforts made we would like to submit a patch that offers users an alternate configure option when configuring openSSH (--with-wolfssl). Similary in our libraries we now have the option "--with-openssh". Could you please get this to the relevant individual(s). We have an altered version of openSSH we currently use and a README to go along which will make initial testing / integration easier. Additionally we are conscious that the changes we made for our purposes may not reflect the goals of the openSSH community as a whole. We would therefore like to discuss the goals of openSSH so that if a patch is implemented, that patch will reflect the goals, wants, and needs of the openSSH community as a whole and not just us here at wolfSSL. Thank you so much for your time and we look forward to further discussion. Kind Regards, Kaleb Himes www.wolfssl.com kaleb at wolfssl.com Skype: kaleb.himes +1 406 381 9556
Kaleb Himes wrote:> As a result of the efforts made we would like to submit a patchSend it as an attachment to start the conversation.> Could you please get this to the relevant individual(s).The way it works is that you send your code, as a patch against current git, to start things off.> we are conscious that the changes we made for our purposes may > not reflect the goals of the openSSH community as a whole.Noone can see what you've done unless you send a patch. //Peter
On Fri, 28 Aug 2015, Kaleb Himes wrote:> To whom it may concern, > > I work for a company wolfSSL .Inc. Over the summer some of our engineers > have worked to build openSSH with wolfSSL instead of openSSL as we were > tired of constant security issues needing patched due to openSSL > compilation. As a result of the efforts made we would like to submit a > patch that offers users an alternate configure option when configuring > openSSH (--with-wolfssl). Similary in our libraries we now have the option > "--with-openssh". > > Could you please get this to the relevant individual(s). We have an altered > version of openSSH we currently use and a README to go along which will > make initial testing / integration easier.Is WolfSSL open source? If so, what license it is under? -d
On Aug 30, 2015 2:10 PM, "Damien Miller" <djm at mindrot.org> wrote:> Is WolfSSL open source? If so, what license it is under?https://wolfssl.com/wolfSSL/download/downloadForm.php says gplv2 and hints at other proprietary options. I lost interest when the download required registration.