llvm dev - Jul 2015 - [LLVMdev] SelectionDAG viewers, filter-view-dags question

Is this option currently mandatory? If so, why? If not, I'm not sure
what's
been added that I need to do differently.

-view-isel-dags opened just fine in dotty in 3.4 and now this does nothing
without the filter-view-dags 'option' and now has a different priority
program list or something.

I'm just curious why this option should be mandatory?

Thanks.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20150727/711edb2c/attachment.html>

It's not supposed to be. There was a short period where it was
unintentionally mandatory but this was fixed after I pointed it out during
post-commit review.

Which version/revision are you using?

From: llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu [mailto:llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu] On
Behalf Of Ryan Taylor
Sent: 27 July 2015 16:27
To: llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu
Subject: [LLVMdev] SelectionDAG viewers, filter-view-dags question

Is this option currently mandatory? If so, why? If not, I'm not sure
what's been added that I need to do differently.

-view-isel-dags opened just fine in dotty in 3.4 and now this does nothing
without the filter-view-dags 'option' and now has a different priority
program list or something.

I'm just curious why this option should be mandatory?

Thanks.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20150727/150323bb/attachment.html>

Daniel,

  We are using 3.6. Someone also pointed out that it was mandatory in 3.6.2
but I have not verified that.


On Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 12:10 PM, Daniel Sanders <Daniel.Sanders at
imgtec.com>
wrote:
>  It's not supposed to be. There was a short period where it was
> unintentionally mandatory but this was fixed after I pointed it out during
> post-commit review.
>
>
>
> Which version/revision are you using?
>
>
>
> *From:* llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu [mailto:llvmdev-bounces at
cs.uiuc.edu] *On
> Behalf Of *Ryan Taylor
> *Sent:* 27 July 2015 16:27
> *To:* llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu
> *Subject:* [LLVMdev] SelectionDAG viewers, filter-view-dags question
>
>
>
> Is this option currently mandatory? If so, why? If not, I'm not sure
> what's been added that I need to do differently.
>
>
>
> -view-isel-dags opened just fine in dotty in 3.4 and now this does nothing
> without the filter-view-dags 'option' and now has a different
priority
> program list or something.
>
>
>
> I'm just curious why this option should be mandatory?
>
>
>
> Thanks.
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20150727/1cb50b00/attachment.html>