Reid said that he has disabled non-x86-64 backends for the clang/win64 buildbot, so maybe this is the first time for us to see these warnings. But all of them seem to be easily fixable, so why don't we do that. On Tue, Feb 9, 2016 at 10:49 AM, Rafael Espíndola < llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org> wrote:> Most of the warnings are actually in LLVM code. Any reason we don't > see it in other bots? > > Cheers, > Rafael > > > On 9 February 2016 at 13:02, Galina Kistanova via llvm-commits > <llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > Hello everyone, > > > > The builder http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/lld-x86_64-win7 is up and > > running. It builds lld and runs lld tests for each commit. > > The build shows 11 warnings, everything else is green. > > > > Do you think it is feasible to treat warnings as errors, or better keep > it > > this way for now? > > > > Thanks > > > > Galina > > > > _______________________________________________ > > llvm-commits mailing list > > llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org > > http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-commits > > > _______________________________________________ > llvm-commits mailing list > llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org > http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-commits >-------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20160209/41b706f0/attachment.html>
Rafael Espíndola via llvm-dev
2016-Feb-09 19:15 UTC
[llvm-dev] Builder lld-x86_64-win7 is back
Sounds good to me :-) Cheers, Rafael On 9 February 2016 at 13:59, Rui Ueyama <ruiu at google.com> wrote:> Reid said that he has disabled non-x86-64 backends for the clang/win64 > buildbot, so maybe this is the first time for us to see these warnings. But > all of them seem to be easily fixable, so why don't we do that. > > On Tue, Feb 9, 2016 at 10:49 AM, Rafael Espíndola > <llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org> wrote: >> >> Most of the warnings are actually in LLVM code. Any reason we don't >> see it in other bots? >> >> Cheers, >> Rafael >> >> >> On 9 February 2016 at 13:02, Galina Kistanova via llvm-commits >> <llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org> wrote: >> > Hello everyone, >> > >> > The builder http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/lld-x86_64-win7 is up and >> > running. It builds lld and runs lld tests for each commit. >> > The build shows 11 warnings, everything else is green. >> > >> > Do you think it is feasible to treat warnings as errors, or better keep >> > it >> > this way for now? >> > >> > Thanks >> > >> > Galina >> > >> > _______________________________________________ >> > llvm-commits mailing list >> > llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org >> > http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-commits >> > >> _______________________________________________ >> llvm-commits mailing list >> llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org >> http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-commits > >
Tried to fix the warning, and I'm not now sure if the warning makes sense. These "'~': zero extending '<smaller integer type>' to 'int64_t' of greater size" warning may be annoying as it is issued for code like "int64_t x ~<some-int32_t-var>". Probably we should disable the warning instead? On Tue, Feb 9, 2016 at 11:15 AM, Rafael Espíndola < rafael.espindola at gmail.com> wrote:> Sounds good to me :-) > > Cheers, > Rafael > > > On 9 February 2016 at 13:59, Rui Ueyama <ruiu at google.com> wrote: > > Reid said that he has disabled non-x86-64 backends for the clang/win64 > > buildbot, so maybe this is the first time for us to see these warnings. > But > > all of them seem to be easily fixable, so why don't we do that. > > > > On Tue, Feb 9, 2016 at 10:49 AM, Rafael Espíndola > > <llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > >> > >> Most of the warnings are actually in LLVM code. Any reason we don't > >> see it in other bots? > >> > >> Cheers, > >> Rafael > >> > >> > >> On 9 February 2016 at 13:02, Galina Kistanova via llvm-commits > >> <llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > >> > Hello everyone, > >> > > >> > The builder http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/lld-x86_64-win7 is up > and > >> > running. It builds lld and runs lld tests for each commit. > >> > The build shows 11 warnings, everything else is green. > >> > > >> > Do you think it is feasible to treat warnings as errors, or better > keep > >> > it > >> > this way for now? > >> > > >> > Thanks > >> > > >> > Galina > >> > > >> > _______________________________________________ > >> > llvm-commits mailing list > >> > llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org > >> > http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-commits > >> > > >> _______________________________________________ > >> llvm-commits mailing list > >> llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org > >> http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-commits > > > > >-------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20160209/08a88a3c/attachment.html>