Yeah I have already see pintool but I need this to work with ARM and Intel. If I remember correctly, pintool does not work on ARM (or quite bad). My goal with the instrumentation is, once I have the information (time + call), to choose (during a second compilation) if some of my passes are applicable or not. Greetings, Johan On 17 Jul 2015, at 16:09, Kenneth Adam Miller <kennethadammiller at gmail.com<mailto:kennethadammiller at gmail.com>> wrote: Have you seen intel pintools? You might not need to write near as much code, however it may not suit your use case because the compiler can see information that otherwise might be missed in the context of a fully compiled binary. Please let me know your thoughts and then we can pick up from there. On Fri, Jul 17, 2015 at 2:43 AM, Wehrli Johan <johan.wehrli at heig-vd.ch<mailto:johan.wehrli at heig-vd.ch>> wrote: Hi everyone, I would like to instrument my code in order to know the number of times a function is called and its execution time. After some research, I find several leads in llvm/lib/ProfilData/ and llvm/lib/Transform/Instrumentation/ but nothing conclusive. Does anyone know if this is already possible with LLVM or has a good suggestion for the beginning? I saw the -fprofile-instr-generate, -fprofile-instr-use, -fprofile-arcs, -ftest-coverage parameters but I can’t get the information I want with it. It seem that the easiest solution is to write a pass who will instrument the code. Greetings, Johan _______________________________________________ LLVM Developers mailing list LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu<mailto:LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu> http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu<http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu/> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev
There's a good example of a function pass in "Getting Started with LLVM Core Libraries", but I'm really quite certain that there are already some excellent profiling tools out there. Are you sure that you're not re-inventing the wheel? Can you tell me more about what the final end goal is? On Fri, Jul 17, 2015 at 10:31 AM, Wehrli Johan <johan.wehrli at heig-vd.ch> wrote:> Yeah I have already see pintool but I need this to work with ARM and Intel. > > If I remember correctly, pintool does not work on ARM (or quite bad). > > My goal with the instrumentation is, once I have the information (time + > call), to choose (during a second compilation) if some of my passes are > applicable or not. > > Greetings, > > Johan > > On 17 Jul 2015, at 16:09, Kenneth Adam Miller <kennethadammiller at gmail.com > <mailto:kennethadammiller at gmail.com>> wrote: > > Have you seen intel pintools? You might not need to write near as much > code, however it may not suit your use case because the compiler can see > information that otherwise might be missed in the context of a fully > compiled binary. Please let me know your thoughts and then we can pick up > from there. > > On Fri, Jul 17, 2015 at 2:43 AM, Wehrli Johan <johan.wehrli at heig-vd.ch > <mailto:johan.wehrli at heig-vd.ch>> wrote: > Hi everyone, > > I would like to instrument my code in order to know the number of times a > function is called and its execution time. > > After some research, I find several leads in llvm/lib/ProfilData/ and > llvm/lib/Transform/Instrumentation/ but nothing conclusive. > > Does anyone know if this is already possible with LLVM or has a good > suggestion for the beginning? > > I saw the -fprofile-instr-generate, -fprofile-instr-use, -fprofile-arcs, > -ftest-coverage parameters but I can’t get the information I want with it. > > It seem that the easiest solution is to write a pass who will instrument > the code. > > Greetings, > > Johan > > _______________________________________________ > LLVM Developers mailing list > LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu<mailto:LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu> > http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu<http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu/> > http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev > > >-------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20150717/b157c83a/attachment.html>
> On 17.07.2015, at 16:31, Wehrli Johan <johan.wehrli at heig-vd.ch> wrote:[…]> My goal with the instrumentation is, once I have the information (time + call), to choose (during a second compilation) if some of my passes are applicable or not.Profile-guided optimization (PGO) [1] … mumble…mumble. Clang/LLVM has infrastructure for that [2]. I somehow can’t imagine that it doesn’t provide call frequencies and timing. In any case that’s probably where to start. HTH, d [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Profile-guided_optimization [2] http://clang.llvm.org/docs/UsersManual.html#profile-guided-optimization> > Greetings, > > Johan > > On 17 Jul 2015, at 16:09, Kenneth Adam Miller <kennethadammiller at gmail.com<mailto:kennethadammiller at gmail.com>> wrote: > > Have you seen intel pintools? You might not need to write near as much code, however it may not suit your use case because the compiler can see information that otherwise might be missed in the context of a fully compiled binary. Please let me know your thoughts and then we can pick up from there. > > On Fri, Jul 17, 2015 at 2:43 AM, Wehrli Johan <johan.wehrli at heig-vd.ch<mailto:johan.wehrli at heig-vd.ch>> wrote: > Hi everyone, > > I would like to instrument my code in order to know the number of times a function is called and its execution time. > > After some research, I find several leads in llvm/lib/ProfilData/ and llvm/lib/Transform/Instrumentation/ but nothing conclusive. > > Does anyone know if this is already possible with LLVM or has a good suggestion for the beginning? > > I saw the -fprofile-instr-generate, -fprofile-instr-use, -fprofile-arcs, -ftest-coverage parameters but I can’t get the information I want with it. > > It seem that the easiest solution is to write a pass who will instrument the code. > > Greetings, > > Johan > > _______________________________________________ > LLVM Developers mailing list > LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu<mailto:LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu> http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu<http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu/> > http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev > > > > _______________________________________________ > LLVM Developers mailing list > LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu > http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev
The PGO was my first guess but I can get a lot of information.
At first, I follow the explanation at
http://clang.llvm.org/docs/UsersManual.html#profiling-with-instrumentation but
instead of llvm-profdata merge, I used llvm-profdata show *.profraw.
Sadly, the information I get is the total number of function, the maximum
function count and the maximum internal block count.
Do you know if you can tune the -fprofile-instr-generate parameter?
I find another way for doing instrumentation
(http://logan.tw/posts/2015/04/28/check-code-coverage-with-clang-and-lcov/)
With this, I get the following information :
Function '_ZL8func_addii'
Lines executed:100.00% of 5
Branches executed:100.00% of 2
Taken at least once:100.00% of 2
No calls
Function 'main'
Lines executed:100.00% of 6
Branches executed:100.00% of 2
Taken at least once:100.00% of 2
No calls
File 'test.cpp'
Lines executed:100.00% of 11
Branches executed:100.00% of 4
Taken at least once:100.00% of 4
No calls
test.cpp:creating 'test.cpp.gcov'
With the following code :
static int func_add(int a, int b){
int res = 0;
for(int i = 0; i < 2; ++i){
res += a + b;
}
return res;
}
int main(int argc, char** argv){
int tab[10] = {5, 9, 7, 6, 2, 4, 3, 5, 8, 10};
for(int i = 0; i < 10; ++i){
printf("%d, ",func_add(tab[i],2));
}
printf("\n");
return 0;
}
I can’t understand the part “taken at leat once”, why main is executed two time?
Greetings,
Johan
On 17 Jul 2015, at 16:56, David Siegel <david.siegel at
artcom.de<mailto:david.siegel at artcom.de>> wrote:
On 17.07.2015, at 16:31, Wehrli Johan <johan.wehrli at
heig-vd.ch<mailto:johan.wehrli at heig-vd.ch>> wrote:
[…]
My goal with the instrumentation is, once I have the information (time + call),
to choose (during a second compilation) if some of my passes are applicable or
not.
Profile-guided optimization (PGO) [1] … mumble…mumble. Clang/LLVM has
infrastructure for that [2]. I somehow can’t imagine that it doesn’t provide
call frequencies and timing. In any case that’s probably where to start.
HTH,
d
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Profile-guided_optimization
[2] http://clang.llvm.org/docs/UsersManual.html#profile-guided-optimization
Greetings,
Johan
On 17 Jul 2015, at 16:09, Kenneth Adam Miller <kennethadammiller at
gmail.com<mailto:kennethadammiller at
gmail.com><mailto:kennethadammiller at gmail.com>> wrote:
Have you seen intel pintools? You might not need to write near as much code,
however it may not suit your use case because the compiler can see information
that otherwise might be missed in the context of a fully compiled binary. Please
let me know your thoughts and then we can pick up from there.
On Fri, Jul 17, 2015 at 2:43 AM, Wehrli Johan <johan.wehrli at
heig-vd.ch<mailto:johan.wehrli at heig-vd.ch><mailto:johan.wehrli at
heig-vd.ch>> wrote:
Hi everyone,
I would like to instrument my code in order to know the number of times a
function is called and its execution time.
After some research, I find several leads in llvm/lib/ProfilData/ and
llvm/lib/Transform/Instrumentation/ but nothing conclusive.
Does anyone know if this is already possible with LLVM or has a good suggestion
for the beginning?
I saw the -fprofile-instr-generate, -fprofile-instr-use, -fprofile-arcs,
-ftest-coverage parameters but I can’t get the information I want with it.
It seem that the easiest solution is to write a pass who will instrument the
code.
Greetings,
Johan
_______________________________________________
LLVM Developers mailing list
LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu<mailto:LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu><mailto:LLVMdev at
cs.uiuc.edu> http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu<http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu/>
http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev
_______________________________________________
LLVM Developers mailing list
LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu<mailto:LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu>
http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu<http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu/>
http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev