Shankar Easwaran
2014-Dec-03 05:08 UTC
[LLVMdev] [lld] need to figure out if file is an archive member and record more information...
Hi Nick, Currently the Reader doesnot have a way to figure out that a file that is being parsed is part of an archive. For linker script support this is needed to match a rule that matches only if the file is from an archive library (or a member of an archive. For example :- SECTIONS { .myoutputsection : { libc.a : { *(.text) } printf.o : { *(.rodata) } } } The colon is used to denote an archive file or a member of an archive file and the rule says pick all text sections from members of libc.a that the linker uses for the current link step. Current Design ------------------------ In the current design we record the archive file and the member in the memory buffer and identify using library(member) which is part of the MemoryBuffer. Information that needs to be recorded --------------------------------------------------------- The linker also needs to store the library and the member names separately as the linker script syntax allows to to distinguish library names and member names. Approach we could take is :- ------------------------------------------- a) Rename MemoryBuffer to LinkerMemoryBuffer, which is a container for MemoryBuffer but with extra information(that contains the filename and an optional member name) If the member name is not empty, the Reader could treat this as an archive member. Comments ?? Shankar Easwaran -- Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, hosted by the Linux Foundation
Rui Ueyama
2014-Dec-03 05:19 UTC
[LLVMdev] [lld] need to figure out if file is an archive member and record more information...
Do you have to know whether a MemoryBuffer was in a library or not during parsing that MemoryBuffer? If not, we could just set a library name to a File in FileArchive::instantiateMember after we call _registry.parseFile. On Tue, Dec 2, 2014 at 9:08 PM, Shankar Easwaran <shankare at codeaurora.org> wrote:> Hi Nick, > > Currently the Reader doesnot have a way to figure out that a file that is > being parsed is part of an archive. > > For linker script support this is needed to match a rule that matches only > if the file is from an archive library (or a member of an archive. > > For example :- > > SECTIONS { > .myoutputsection : { > libc.a : { *(.text) } > printf.o : { *(.rodata) } > } > } > > The colon is used to denote an archive file or a member of an archive file > and the rule says pick all text sections from members of libc.a that the > linker uses for the current link step. > > Current Design > ------------------------ > In the current design we record the archive file and the member in the > memory buffer and identify using library(member) which is part of the > MemoryBuffer. > > Information that needs to be recorded > --------------------------------------------------------- > The linker also needs to store the library and the member names separately > as the linker script syntax allows to to distinguish library names and > member names. > > Approach we could take is :- > ------------------------------------------- > a) Rename MemoryBuffer to LinkerMemoryBuffer, which is a container for > MemoryBuffer but with extra information(that contains the filename and an > optional member name) > > If the member name is not empty, the Reader could treat this as an archive > member. > > Comments ?? > > Shankar Easwaran > > -- > Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, hosted > by the Linux Foundation > > _______________________________________________ > LLVM Developers mailing list > LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu > http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev >-------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20141202/4d52c762/attachment.html>
Shankar Easwaran
2014-Dec-03 05:24 UTC
[LLVMdev] [lld] need to figure out if file is an archive member and record more information...
On 12/2/2014 11:19 PM, Rui Ueyama wrote:> Do you have to know whether a MemoryBuffer was in a library or not during > parsing that MemoryBuffer?Yes, I need to know that while parsing the buffer too.> > If not, we could just set a library name to a File in > FileArchive::instantiateMember after we call _registry.parseFile. > > On Tue, Dec 2, 2014 at 9:08 PM, Shankar Easwaran <shankare at codeaurora.org> > wrote: > >> Hi Nick, >> >> Currently the Reader doesnot have a way to figure out that a file that is >> being parsed is part of an archive. >> >> For linker script support this is needed to match a rule that matches only >> if the file is from an archive library (or a member of an archive. >> >> For example :- >> >> SECTIONS { >> .myoutputsection : { >> libc.a : { *(.text) } >> printf.o : { *(.rodata) } >> } >> } >> >> The colon is used to denote an archive file or a member of an archive file >> and the rule says pick all text sections from members of libc.a that the >> linker uses for the current link step. >> >> Current Design >> ------------------------ >> In the current design we record the archive file and the member in the >> memory buffer and identify using library(member) which is part of the >> MemoryBuffer. >> >> Information that needs to be recorded >> --------------------------------------------------------- >> The linker also needs to store the library and the member names separately >> as the linker script syntax allows to to distinguish library names and >> member names. >> >> Approach we could take is :- >> ------------------------------------------- >> a) Rename MemoryBuffer to LinkerMemoryBuffer, which is a container for >> MemoryBuffer but with extra information(that contains the filename and an >> optional member name) >> >> If the member name is not empty, the Reader could treat this as an archive >> member. >> >> Comments ?? >> >> Shankar Easwaran >> >> -- >> Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, hosted >> by the Linux Foundation >> >> _______________________________________________ >> LLVM Developers mailing list >> LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu >> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev >>-- Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, hosted by the Linux Foundation
Apparently Analagous Threads
- [LLVMdev] [lld] need to figure out if file is an archive member and record more information...
- [LLVMdev] LLD archive library design
- [LLVMdev] LLD archive library design
- [LLVMdev] LLD archive library design
- [LLVMdev] [lld] Verifying the Architecture of files read