Hi, On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 3:26 PM, Hal Finkel <hfinkel at anl.gov> wrote:> ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "İsmail Dönmez" <ismail at donmez.ws> > > To: "Hal Finkel" <hfinkel at anl.gov> > > Cc: "LLVM Developers Mailing List" <llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu> > > Sent: Wednesday, March 26, 2014 8:20:31 AM > > Subject: Re: Lots of regtest failures on PPC64/Linux > > > > > > Hi Hal, > > > > > > > > On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 3:17 PM, Hal Finkel < hfinkel at anl.gov > > > wrote: > > > > > > İsmail, > > > > These are self-hosted builds? It seems like a lot of crashes in > > llvm::sys::AtomicIncrement. > > > > > > Yes. stage1 clang is used in stage2. > > Okay; I don't know particularly, but do you know about when things started > failing? These are Release builds? with -mcpu=ppc64 or -mcpu=native? >Actually no -mcpu flag is used hence its clang's whatever default. And the regression introduced in the last ~7 days or so. Thanks. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20140326/5ba3eb48/attachment.html>
----- Original Message -----> From: "İsmail Dönmez" <ismail at donmez.ws> > To: "Hal Finkel" <hfinkel at anl.gov> > Cc: "LLVM Developers Mailing List" <llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu> > Sent: Wednesday, March 26, 2014 8:45:11 AM > Subject: Re: Lots of regtest failures on PPC64/Linux > > > Hi, > > > > On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 3:26 PM, Hal Finkel < hfinkel at anl.gov > > wrote: > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "İsmail Dönmez" < ismail at donmez.ws > > > > > To: "Hal Finkel" < hfinkel at anl.gov > > > Cc: "LLVM Developers Mailing List" < llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu > > > Sent: Wednesday, March 26, 2014 8:20:31 AM > > Subject: Re: Lots of regtest failures on PPC64/Linux > > > > > > Hi Hal, > > > > > > > > On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 3:17 PM, Hal Finkel < hfinkel at anl.gov > > > wrote: > > > > > > İsmail, > > > > These are self-hosted builds? It seems like a lot of crashes in > > llvm::sys::AtomicIncrement. > > > > > > Yes. stage1 clang is used in stage2. > > Okay; I don't know particularly, but do you know about when things > started failing? These are Release builds? with -mcpu=ppc64 or > -mcpu=native? > > > > Actually no -mcpu flag is used hence its clang's whatever default. > And the regression introduced in the last ~7 days or so.Okay, interesting. I also did a build with -mcpu=ppc64 and did not observe these issues. What standard C++ library are you building against? -Hal> > > Thanks. > > >-- Hal Finkel Assistant Computational Scientist Leadership Computing Facility Argonne National Laboratory
Hi, On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 4:19 PM, Hal Finkel <hfinkel at anl.gov> wrote:> > Okay, interesting. I also did a build with -mcpu=ppc64 and did not observe > these issues. What standard C++ library are you building against? >libstdc++ 4.8.2 , a build with -mcpu=native in progress. I'll let you know. ismail -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20140326/1af38992/attachment.html>
Hi, On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 4:19 PM, Hal Finkel <hfinkel at anl.gov> wrote:> > Okay, interesting. I also did a build with -mcpu=ppc64 and did not observe > these issues. What standard C++ library are you building against? >I disabled assertions and the number of failures halved but Debuginfo failures looks very weird. Don't know if it helps to debug the issue at hand. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20140401/4ae56409/attachment.html> -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: ppc64.log Type: text/x-log Size: 29165 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20140401/4ae56409/attachment.bin>