Sebastian Pop
2012-Dec-03 17:07 UTC
[LLVMdev] [polly] removing cloog dependence in the testsuite
Tobias Grosser wrote:> Regarding patch one and three: We already have the directory > test/CodeGen and test/IslCodeGen. I propose to just leave the CLooG test > cases in test/CodeGen, but to run them conditionally.I only know how to disable the test of a full directory, so if you want I can disable all the CodeGen directory (and subdirectories) when Cloog is not available. Note that in my first patch I have moved only those tests not working without cloog, and there are several testcases left in CodeGen that can still be executed with ISL's codegen.> You can add the new isl test cases to test/IslCodeGen. >That's what patch 3 does, except for a minor rename to avoid a redundant CodeGen in the dir names. Sebastian -- Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation
Tobias Grosser
2012-Dec-03 17:15 UTC
[LLVMdev] [polly] removing cloog dependence in the testsuite
On 12/03/2012 06:07 PM, Sebastian Pop wrote:> Tobias Grosser wrote: >> Regarding patch one and three: We already have the directory >> test/CodeGen and test/IslCodeGen. I propose to just leave the CLooG test >> cases in test/CodeGen, but to run them conditionally. > > I only know how to disable the test of a full directory, so if you want I can > disable all the CodeGen directory (and subdirectories) when Cloog is not > available. Note that in my first patch I have moved only those tests not > working without cloog, and there are several testcases left in CodeGen that can > still be executed with ISL's codegen.I did not realize there are tests that work for both. What are those tests doing?>> You can add the new isl test cases to test/IslCodeGen. >> > > That's what patch 3 does, except for a minor rename to avoid a redundant CodeGen > in the dir names.I was basically aiming for having one test directory for one LLVM-IR pass. Instead of having shared test cases, I would rather copy those tests to the isl directory. Cheers Tobi
Sebastian Pop
2012-Dec-03 18:42 UTC
[LLVMdev] [polly] removing cloog dependence in the testsuite
Tobias Grosser wrote:> On 12/03/2012 06:07 PM, Sebastian Pop wrote: > >Tobias Grosser wrote: > >>Regarding patch one and three: We already have the directory > >>test/CodeGen and test/IslCodeGen. I propose to just leave the CLooG test > >>cases in test/CodeGen, but to run them conditionally. > > > >I only know how to disable the test of a full directory, so if you want I can > >disable all the CodeGen directory (and subdirectories) when Cloog is not > >available. Note that in my first patch I have moved only those tests not > >working without cloog, and there are several testcases left in CodeGen that can > >still be executed with ISL's codegen. > > I did not realize there are tests that work for both. > What are those tests doing?Here is what is left in my CodeGen dir: polly/test/CodeGen$ find . -name '*.ll' ./20100708.ll ./single_loop_ull_max_iterations.ll ./single_loop_uint_max_iterations.ll ./reduction.ll ./single_do_loop_one_iteration.ll ./OpenMP/20120330-argument-use.ll ./OpenMP/simple_nested_loop.ll ./OpenMP/structnames.ll ./OpenMP/parallel_loop_simple2.ll ./OpenMP/copy_in_temporary.ll ./OpenMP/parallel_loop_simple.ll ./OpenMP/clastvar_after_parallel_loop.ll ./OpenMP/add_memref.ll ./OpenMP/copy_in_argument.ll ./OpenMP/invalidate_subfn_scops.ll ./OpenMP/two_loop.ll ./OpenMP/parallel_loop.ll ./OpenMP/param_referenced_in_stmt.ll ./OpenMP/extract_memref.ll ./scev.ll ./single_do_loop_int_param_iterations.ll ./MemAccess/simple_analyze.ll ./MemAccess/simple.ll ./20110312-Fail-without-basicaa.ll ./GPGPU/3d_innermost_non_parallel.ll ./GPGPU/2d_innermost_parallel.ll ./test.ll The OpenMP ones are already guarded with have_cloog, and the GPGPU ones are also guarded. I could move all these except OpenMP/GPGPU to the Cloog/CodeGen dir.> >>You can add the new isl test cases to test/IslCodeGen. > >> > > > >That's what patch 3 does, except for a minor rename to avoid a redundant CodeGen > >in the dir names. > > I was basically aiming for having one test directory for one LLVM-IR > pass. Instead of having shared test cases, I would rather copy those > tests to the isl directory.Then let's not use CodeGen for the Cloog code gen dir. I have used Cloog/CodeGen and Isl/CodeGen and I think this is consistent with what you want. I can then move the remaining tests in Cloog/CodeGen and duplicate them in Isl/CodeGen. What do you think? Sebastian -- Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation
Seemingly Similar Threads
- [LLVMdev] [polly] removing cloog dependence in the testsuite
- [LLVMdev] [polly] removing cloog dependence in the testsuite
- [LLVMdev] [polly] removing cloog dependence in the testsuite
- [LLVMdev] [polly] removing cloog dependence in the testsuite
- [LLVMdev] [polly] removing cloog dependence in the testsuite