thr3ads.net - llvm dev - [LLVMdev] LLVM 3.0rc3 Testing Beginning [Nov 2011]

If this information is useful, please help other people find it:
Share via:

Bill Wendling

2011-Nov-07 22:00 UTC

[LLVMdev] LLVM 3.0rc3 Testing Beginning

Good day, LLVMers!

We are starting on our third (and hopefully last) round of testing for LLVM 3.0.
Please visit:

	http://llvm.org/pre-releases/3.0/rc3/

for the sources. There are also binaries for Darwin up there, with more to come
during the week. Please build this release candidate, test it out on your
projects, and let us know if you find any regressions from the 2.9 release.

Please keep in mind that we are not taking any more fixes except for those
issues which are critical for the release.

Share and enjoy!
-bw

Douglas Gregor

2011-Nov-07 22:29 UTC

head link

[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] LLVM 3.0rc3 Testing Beginning

On Nov 7, 2011, at 2:00 PM, Bill Wendling wrote:
> Good day, LLVMers!
> 
> We are starting on our third (and hopefully last) round of testing for LLVM
3.0. Please visit:
> 
> 	http://llvm.org/pre-releases/3.0/rc3/
> 
> for the sources. There are also binaries for Darwin up there, with more to
come during the week. Please build this release candidate, test it out on your
projects, and let us know if you find any regressions from the 2.9 release.

Especially if you're running Linux, please give Clang in RC3 a spin, even if
you previously tested RC2. We've updated the header-search logic to try to
make Clang more robust against different system include directory layouts, and
need help with more widespread testing.

	- Doug

Fletcher, John P

2011-Nov-08 11:10 UTC

head link

[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] LLVM 3.0rc3 Testing Beginning

Which files are needed to build clang? Is it clang-3.0rc2 and llvm-3.0rc3 or do
I need the whole test suite?

John

Dr John P. Fletcher Tel: (44) 121 204 3389 (direct line), FAX: (44) 121 204 3678
Chemical Engineering and Applied Chemistry (CEAC),
Associate Dean - External Relations,
School of Engineering and Applied Science (EAS),
Aston University, Aston Triangle, BIRMINGHAM B4 7ET  U.K.               



-----Original Message-----
From: cfe-dev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu [mailto:cfe-dev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu] On
Behalf Of Douglas Gregor
Sent: 07 November 2011 22:29
To: Bill Wendling
Cc: cfe-dev at cs.uiuc.edu Developers; LLVM Developers Mailing List
Subject: Re: [cfe-dev] LLVM 3.0rc3 Testing Beginning


On Nov 7, 2011, at 2:00 PM, Bill Wendling wrote:
> Good day, LLVMers!
> 
> We are starting on our third (and hopefully last) round of testing for LLVM
3.0. Please visit:
> 
> 	http://llvm.org/pre-releases/3.0/rc3/
> 
> for the sources. There are also binaries for Darwin up there, with more to
come during the week. Please build this release candidate, test it out on your
projects, and let us know if you find any regressions from the 2.9 release.

Especially if you're running Linux, please give Clang in RC3 a spin, even if
you previously tested RC2. We've updated the header-search logic to try to
make Clang more robust against different system include directory layouts, and
need help with more widespread testing.

	- Doug
_______________________________________________
cfe-dev mailing list
cfe-dev at cs.uiuc.edu
http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-dev

Jay Foad

2011-Nov-08 15:18 UTC

head link

[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] LLVM 3.0rc3 Testing Beginning

On 7 November 2011 22:00, Bill Wendling <wendling at apple.com>
wrote:> We are starting on our third (and hopefully last) round of testing for LLVM
3.0. Please visit:
>
>        http://llvm.org/pre-releases/3.0/rc3/
>
> for the sources. There are also binaries for Darwin up there, with more to
come during the week. Please build this release candidate, test it out on your
projects, and let us know if you find any regressions from the 2.9 release.
I've done a "make -j2 all check-all", llvm + clang, Release build,
on
Ubuntu Linux 11.04 x86_64. I got one test failure:

Failing Tests (1):
    Clang-Unit :: AST/Release/ASTTests/APValue.Diagnostics

I've pasted the output of the test below.

Jay.


FAIL: Clang-Unit :: AST/Release/ASTTests/APValue.Diagnostics (3931 of 9598)
******************** TEST 'Clang-Unit ::
AST/Release/ASTTests/APValue.Diagnostics' FAILED ********************
Note: Google Test filter = APValue.Diagnostics
[==========] Running 1 test from 1 test case.
[----------] Global test environment set-up.
[----------] 1 test from APValue
[ RUN      ] APValue.Diagnostics
/home/jay/llvm/clang-3.0rc3.src/unittests/AST/APValueTest.cpp:62: Failure
Value of: GetDiagnosticOutput(APValue())
  Actual: ""
Expected: "Uninitialized"
/home/jay/llvm/clang-3.0rc3.src/unittests/AST/APValueTest.cpp:63: Failure
Value of: GetDiagnosticOutput(APValue(APSInt(APInt(16, 5))))
  Actual: ""
Expected: "5"
/home/jay/llvm/clang-3.0rc3.src/unittests/AST/APValueTest.cpp:66: Failure
Value of: GetDiagnosticOutput(APValue(APFloat(APFloat::IEEEdouble,
"3.14159")))
  Actual: ""
Expected: "3.141590e+00"
/home/jay/llvm/clang-3.0rc3.src/unittests/AST/APValueTest.cpp:69: Failure
Value of: GetDiagnosticOutput(APValue(APSInt(APInt(16, 3)),
APSInt(APInt(16, 4))))
  Actual: ""
Expected: "3+4i"
/home/jay/llvm/clang-3.0rc3.src/unittests/AST/APValueTest.cpp:73: Failure
Value of: GetDiagnosticOutput(APValue( APFloat(APFloat::IEEEdouble,
"3.2"), APFloat(APFloat::IEEEdouble, "5.7")))
  Actual: ""
Expected: "3.200000e+00+5.700000e+00i"
/home/jay/llvm/clang-3.0rc3.src/unittests/AST/APValueTest.cpp:80: Failure
Value of: GetDiagnosticOutput(APValue(V, array_lengthof(V)))
  Actual: ""
Expected: "[3, 4, 5]"
[  FAILED  ] APValue.Diagnostics (1 ms)
[----------] 1 test from APValue (16 ms total)

[----------] Global test environment tear-down
[==========] 1 test from 1 test case ran. (16 ms total)
[  PASSED  ] 0 tests.
[  FAILED  ] 1 test, listed below:
[  FAILED  ] APValue.Diagnostics

 1 FAILED TEST

Bill Wendling

2011-Nov-08 18:15 UTC

head link

[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] LLVM 3.0rc3 Testing Beginning

On Nov 8, 2011, at 7:18 AM, Jay Foad wrote:
> On 7 November 2011 22:00, Bill Wendling <wendling at apple.com>
wrote:
>> We are starting on our third (and hopefully last) round of testing for
LLVM 3.0. Please visit:
>> 
>>        http://llvm.org/pre-releases/3.0/rc3/
>> 
>> for the sources. There are also binaries for Darwin up there, with more
to come during the week. Please build this release candidate, test it out on
your projects, and let us know if you find any regressions from the 2.9 release.
> 
> I've done a "make -j2 all check-all", llvm + clang, Release
build, on
> Ubuntu Linux 11.04 x86_64. I got one test failure:
> 
> Failing Tests (1):
>    Clang-Unit :: AST/Release/ASTTests/APValue.Diagnostics
> 
> I've pasted the output of the test below.
> Jay,

Did you see these failures for rc2?

Chandler,

Could these be related to your changes?

-bw
> FAIL: Clang-Unit :: AST/Release/ASTTests/APValue.Diagnostics (3931 of 9598)
> ******************** TEST 'Clang-Unit ::
> AST/Release/ASTTests/APValue.Diagnostics' FAILED ********************
> Note: Google Test filter = APValue.Diagnostics
> [==========] Running 1 test from 1 test case.
> [----------] Global test environment set-up.
> [----------] 1 test from APValue
> [ RUN      ] APValue.Diagnostics
> /home/jay/llvm/clang-3.0rc3.src/unittests/AST/APValueTest.cpp:62: Failure
> Value of: GetDiagnosticOutput(APValue())
>  Actual: ""
> Expected: "Uninitialized"
> /home/jay/llvm/clang-3.0rc3.src/unittests/AST/APValueTest.cpp:63: Failure
> Value of: GetDiagnosticOutput(APValue(APSInt(APInt(16, 5))))
>  Actual: ""
> Expected: "5"
> /home/jay/llvm/clang-3.0rc3.src/unittests/AST/APValueTest.cpp:66: Failure
> Value of: GetDiagnosticOutput(APValue(APFloat(APFloat::IEEEdouble,
"3.14159")))
>  Actual: ""
> Expected: "3.141590e+00"
> /home/jay/llvm/clang-3.0rc3.src/unittests/AST/APValueTest.cpp:69: Failure
> Value of: GetDiagnosticOutput(APValue(APSInt(APInt(16, 3)),
> APSInt(APInt(16, 4))))
>  Actual: ""
> Expected: "3+4i"
> /home/jay/llvm/clang-3.0rc3.src/unittests/AST/APValueTest.cpp:73: Failure
> Value of: GetDiagnosticOutput(APValue( APFloat(APFloat::IEEEdouble,
> "3.2"), APFloat(APFloat::IEEEdouble, "5.7")))
>  Actual: ""
> Expected: "3.200000e+00+5.700000e+00i"
> /home/jay/llvm/clang-3.0rc3.src/unittests/AST/APValueTest.cpp:80: Failure
> Value of: GetDiagnosticOutput(APValue(V, array_lengthof(V)))
>  Actual: ""
> Expected: "[3, 4, 5]"
> [  FAILED  ] APValue.Diagnostics (1 ms)
> [----------] 1 test from APValue (16 ms total)
> 
> [----------] Global test environment tear-down
> [==========] 1 test from 1 test case ran. (16 ms total)
> [  PASSED  ] 0 tests.
> [  FAILED  ] 1 test, listed below:
> [  FAILED  ] APValue.Diagnostics
> 
> 1 FAILED TEST

David A. Greene

2011-Nov-09 03:20 UTC

head link

[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] LLVM 3.0rc3 Testing Beginning

On 7 November 2011 22:00, Bill Wendling <wendling at apple.com> wrote:
> We are starting on our third (and hopefully last) round of testing for LLVM
3.0. Please visit:
>
>        http://llvm.org/pre-releases/3.0/rc3/
>
> for the sources. There are also binaries for Darwin up there, with
> more to come during the week. Please build this release candidate,
> test it out on your projects, and let us know if you find any
> regressions from the 2.9 release.
On Linux Debian testing, gcc-4.6.1:

Built fine, with warnings listed below

make check-all passed

I couldn't figure out how to run the test-suite.  Are there up-to-date
instructions somewhere?  llvm-gcc doesn't exist anymore...

                      -Dave

I get the following warnings building llvm+clang (default configure,
default make target):

/home/greened/src/llvm-30-rc3/llvm/lib/Support/Mutex.cpp: In constructor
‘llvm::sys::MutexImpl::MutexImpl(bool)’:
/home/greened/src/llvm-30-rc3/llvm/lib/Support/Mutex.cpp:69:9: warning: variable
‘errorcode’ set but not used [-Wunused-but-set-variable]

/home/greened/src/llvm-30-rc3/llvm/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/LegalizeDAG.cpp: In
member function ‘llvm::SDValue
{anonymous}::SelectionDAGLegalize::LegalizeOp(llvm::SDValue)’:
/home/greened/src/llvm-30-rc3/llvm/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/LegalizeDAG.cpp:1652:19:
warning: variable ‘EltVT’ set but not used [-Wunused-but-set-variable]
/home/greened/src/llvm-30-rc3/llvm/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/LegalizeDAG.cpp:1632:15:
warning: variable ‘WideScalarVT’ set but not used [-Wunused-but-set-variable]

/home/greened/src/llvm-30-rc3/llvm/lib/Target/ARM/ARMISelDAGToDAG.cpp: In member
function ‘llvm::SDNode*
{anonymous}::ARMDAGToDAGISel::SelectABSOp(llvm::SDNode*)’:
/home/greened/src/llvm-30-rc3/llvm/lib/Target/ARM/ARMISelDAGToDAG.cpp:2319:12:
warning: variable ‘DL’ set but not used [-Wunused-but-set-variable]

/home/greened/src/llvm-30-rc3/llvm/lib/Target/ARM/AsmParser/ARMAsmParser.cpp: In
member function ‘bool
{anonymous}::ARMAsmParser::tryParseRegisterWithWriteBack(llvm::SmallVectorImpl<llvm::MCParsedAsmOperand*>&)’:
/home/greened/src/llvm-30-rc3/llvm/lib/Target/ARM/AsmParser/ARMAsmParser.cpp:1979:11:
warning: variable ‘ExprLoc’ set but not used [-Wunused-but-set-variable]

/home/greened/src/llvm-30-rc3/llvm/lib/Target/ARM/Disassembler/ARMDisassembler.cpp:
In function ‘DecodeStatus DecodeCopMemInstruction(llvm::MCInst&, unsigned
int, uint64_t, const void*)’:
/home/greened/src/llvm-30-rc3/llvm/lib/Target/ARM/Disassembler/ARMDisassembler.cpp:1241:12:
warning: variable ‘idx_mode’ set but not used [-Wunused-but-set-variable]

/home/greened/src/llvm-30-rc3/clang-3.0rc3.src/lib/Lex/Lexer.cpp: In static
member function ‘static clang::SourceLocation
clang::Lexer::GetBeginningOfToken(clang::SourceLocation, const
clang::SourceManager&, const clang::LangOptions&)’:
/home/greened/src/llvm-30-rc3/clang-3.0rc3.src/lib/Lex/Lexer.cpp:489:30:
warning: variable ‘FileLocInfo’ set but not used [-Wunused-but-set-variable]
/home/greened/src/llvm-30-rc3/clang-3.0rc3.src/lib/Lex/Lexer.cpp:490:30:
warning: variable ‘BeginFileLocInfo’ set but not used
[-Wunused-but-set-variable]

/home/greened/src/llvm-30-rc3/clang-3.0rc3.src/lib/AST/Decl.cpp: In member
function ‘unsigned int clang::FieldDecl::getFieldIndex() const’:
/home/greened/src/llvm-30-rc3/clang-3.0rc3.src/lib/AST/Decl.cpp:2209:53:
warning: variable ‘e’ set but not used [-Wunused-but-set-variable]

/home/greened/src/llvm-30-rc3/clang-3.0rc3.src/lib/Sema/SemaExpr.cpp: In member
function ‘clang::QualType
clang::Sema::CheckVectorCompareOperands(clang::ExprResult&,
clang::ExprResult&, clang::SourceLocation, bool)’:
/home/greened/src/llvm-30-rc3/clang-3.0rc3.src/lib/Sema/SemaExpr.cpp:6698:12:
warning: variable ‘RHSType’ set but not used [-Wunused-but-set-variable]

/home/greened/src/llvm-30-rc3/clang-3.0rc3.src/lib/StaticAnalyzer/Core/RegionStore.cpp:
In member function ‘clang::ento::SVal
{anonymous}::RegionStoreManager::RetrieveStruct(clang::ento::Store, const
clang::ento::TypedValueRegion*)’:
/home/greened/src/llvm-30-rc3/clang-3.0rc3.src/lib/StaticAnalyzer/Core/RegionStore.cpp:1280:12:
warning: variable ‘T’ set but not used [-Wunused-but-set-variable]

/home/greened/src/llvm-30-rc3/clang-3.0rc3.src/lib/Sema/SemaTemplateInstantiateDecl.cpp:
In member function ‘clang::NamedDecl*
clang::Sema::FindInstantiatedDecl(clang::SourceLocation, clang::NamedDecl*,
const clang::MultiLevelTemplateArgumentList&)’:
/home/greened/src/llvm-30-rc3/clang-3.0rc3.src/lib/Sema/SemaTemplateInstantiateDecl.cpp:3170:12:
warning: variable ‘SawNonDependentContext’ set but not used
[-Wunused-but-set-variable]

/home/greened/src/llvm-30-rc3/clang-3.0rc3.src/lib/CodeGen/CGRecordLayoutBuilder.cpp:
In member function ‘void {anonymous}::CGRecordLayoutBuilder::LayoutUnion(const
clang::RecordDecl*)’:
/home/greened/src/llvm-30-rc3/clang-3.0rc3.src/lib/CodeGen/CGRecordLayoutBuilder.cpp:528:8:
warning: variable ‘hasOnlyZeroSizedBitFields’ set but not used
[-Wunused-but-set-variable]

Jay Foad

2011-Nov-15 09:53 UTC

head link

[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] LLVM 3.0rc3 Testing Beginning

On 8 November 2011 15:18, Jay Foad <jay.foad at gmail.com>
wrote:> I've done a "make -j2 all check-all", llvm + clang, Release
build, on
> Ubuntu Linux 11.04 x86_64. I got one test failure:
>
> Failing Tests (1):
>    Clang-Unit :: AST/Release/ASTTests/APValue.Diagnostics
For the record, I had a closer look at this. It seems to be a bug in
my system compiler on Ubuntu 11.04, gcc (Ubuntu/Linaro 4.5.2-8ubuntu4)
4.5.2.

In this code from unittests/AST/APValueTest.cpp:

  template<typename T>
  std::string operator()(const T& value) {
    Diag.Report(diag_just_format) << value;
    return LastDiagnostic.get().str();
  }

... the compiler is failing to call the destructor for the temporary
DiagnosticBuilder returned from Diag.Report(diag_just_format).

If I compile the test with gcc 4.6.1 (which I built from source) the
problem goes away.

Jay.

Possibly Parallel Threads

Search for more possibly parallel threads

llvm dev - Nov 2011 - [LLVMdev] LLVM 3.0rc3 Testing Beginning

[LLVMdev] LLVM 3.0rc3 Testing Beginning

[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] LLVM 3.0rc3 Testing Beginning

[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] LLVM 3.0rc3 Testing Beginning

[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] LLVM 3.0rc3 Testing Beginning

[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] LLVM 3.0rc3 Testing Beginning

[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] LLVM 3.0rc3 Testing Beginning

[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] LLVM 3.0rc3 Testing Beginning

Possibly Parallel Threads