llvm dev - Oct 2011 - [LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] Release: Two Weeks 'Til 3.0 Branch

As of today, there are two weeks left until we branch for the 3.0 release.
Please get your changes in as soon as possible so that they are well-tested
before the branch. And please keep on top of any failures you see.

Now would be a good time to look through the bugzilla database to see if there
are any issues you can address. :-)

-bw

On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 04:45:33PM -0700, Bill Wendling
wrote:
> As of today, there are two weeks left until we branch for the 3.0
> release. Please get your changes in as soon as possible so that they
> are well-tested before the branch. And please keep on top of any failures
you see.
> 
> Now would be a good time to look through the bugzilla database to see
> if there are any issues you can address. :-)
Is there a list of potential branch blockers? E.g. PR 10912 is a
crash-on-valid for Qt4 builds, which is kind of high profile.

Joerg

On 6 Oct 2011 at 23:35, Joerg Sonnenberger wrote:
> Is there a list of potential branch blockers? E.g. PR 10912 is a
> crash-on-valid for Qt4 builds, which is kind of high profile.
and there's 4068 for linux :)

On Oct 6, 2011, at 2:35 PM, Joerg Sonnenberger wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 04:45:33PM -0700, Bill Wendling wrote:
>> As of today, there are two weeks left until we branch for the 3.0
>> release. Please get your changes in as soon as possible so that they
>> are well-tested before the branch. And please keep on top of any
failures you see.
>> 
>> Now would be a good time to look through the bugzilla database to see
>> if there are any issues you can address. :-)
> 
> Is there a list of potential branch blockers? E.g. PR 10912 is a
> crash-on-valid for Qt4 builds, which is kind of high profile.
First, PR10912 looks like it was fixed in June.

Second, we do not have branch blockers. We have release blockers which are
defined in this document:
http://llvm.org/docs/HowToReleaseLLVM.html#release-qualify

Release blockers are fixed in TOT and the patches are applied to the branch.

If we had a larger set of volunteers that could help qualify releases AND
buildbots to continuously test the new release criteria, then we are willing to
expand this criteria. We haven't had a lot of volunteers step up in this
area though.

-Tanya

On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 04:45:33PM -0700, Bill Wendling
wrote:
> Now would be a good time to look through the bugzilla database to see
> if there are any issues you can address. :-)
I'll try to get attention to two issues. PR 10584 is an issue in Global
Value Propogation and requires extreme amount of time (> 1h) and memory.
This is from gambc.

The second issue is PR 11090. Some issue in the Loop Strength Reduction
that makes it eat > 8GB memory, no idea about the runtime. This is part
of PHP 5.3, so kind of important.

Joerg