llvm dev - Aug 2010 - [LLVMdev] What does this error mean: psuedo instructions should be removed before code emission?

Also there is a typo: it probably should read pseudo.

Yuri

On Aug 26, 2010, at 10:50 AM, Yuri wrote:
> Also there is a typo: it probably should read pseudo.
A pseudo instruction is used internally without llvm, but it does not correspond
directly to a real instruction in the target architecture.  Before emitting the
final compiled code, all the pseudo instructions must be expanded to real
instructions.  If you're seeing that error, it means that something was not
expanded.

I fixed all the "psuedo" misspellings in svn 112202.  I didn't see
the error message, so that must have been changed already.

On Aug 26, 2010, at 11:11 AM, Bob Wilson wrote:
> 
> On Aug 26, 2010, at 10:50 AM, Yuri wrote:
> 
>> Also there is a typo: it probably should read pseudo.
> 
> A pseudo instruction is used internally without llvm, but it does not
correspond directly to a real instruction in the target architecture.  Before
emitting the final compiled code, all the pseudo instructions must be expanded
to real instructions.  If you're seeing that error, it means that something
was not expanded.
> 
> I fixed all the "psuedo" misspellings in svn 112202.  I
didn't see the error message, so that must have been changed already.
...and speaking of typos, that was supposed to be "used internally _within_
llvm"

On 08/26/2010 11:11, Bob Wilson wrote:
> A pseudo instruction is used internally without llvm, but it does not
correspond directly to a real instruction in the target architecture.  Before
emitting the final compiled code, all the pseudo instructions must be expanded
to real instructions.  If you're seeing that error, it means that something
was not expanded.
>    
So what is likely to be wrong? This error only happens on amd64 and not 
on i386, variable Opcode is 2493 when the error occurs.
It is triggered from under the call that I make: JIT::runFunction.

Yuri