I see two minor configure errors on FreeBSD. The first is: checking for mmap of files... yes checking if /dev/zero is needed for mmap... test: FreeBSD: unexpected operator no The second: checking for python... true python test: : bad number configure: WARNING: QMTest requires Python 2.2 or later I guess it shouldn't get the "bad number" error if python is missing (and it is in this case). But we don't use QMTest anymore, correct? So isn't the python test obsolete?
On Tue, Dec 28, 2004 at 10:47:43PM -0800, Jeff Cohen wrote:> checking for mmap of files... yes > checking if /dev/zero is needed for mmap... test: FreeBSD: unexpected > operator > noIt could be due to the '==' in the test, it also trips up /bin/sh on Sparc, so I use ksh for configuring.> checking for python... true python > test: : bad number > configure: WARNING: QMTest requires Python 2.2 or later > > I guess it shouldn't get the "bad number" error if python is missing > (and it is in this case). But we don't use QMTest anymore, correct? > So isn't the python test obsolete?I think it's obsolete and must be just an artifact left behind. -- Misha Brukman :: http://misha.brukman.net :: http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu
On Tue, 2004-12-28 at 22:47, Jeff Cohen wrote:> I see two minor configure errors on FreeBSD. The first is: > > checking for mmap of files... yes > checking if /dev/zero is needed for mmap... test: FreeBSD: unexpected > operator > noThat was a bug and I just fixed it. Thanks for pointing it out.> The second: > > checking for python... true python > test: : bad number > configure: WARNING: QMTest requires Python 2.2 or later > > I guess it shouldn't get the "bad number" error if python is missing > (and it is in this case). But we don't use QMTest anymore, correct? So > isn't the python test obsolete?ERM, we removed those tests before the /dev/zero test went in so I'm a little confused on how those messages are generated. If you look at autoconf/* you'll find that neither python nor qmtest occur in any file. What were you configuring when this message was generated? Reid.> > _______________________________________________ > LLVM Developers mailing list > LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu > http://mail.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev-------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20041228/afc0a200/attachment.sig>
llvm-test, I think. Reid Spencer wrote:>On Tue, 2004-12-28 at 22:47, Jeff Cohen wrote: > > >>I see two minor configure errors on FreeBSD. The first is: >> >>checking for mmap of files... yes >>checking if /dev/zero is needed for mmap... test: FreeBSD: unexpected >>operator >>no >> >> > >That was a bug and I just fixed it. Thanks for pointing it out. > > > >>The second: >> >>checking for python... true python >>test: : bad number >>configure: WARNING: QMTest requires Python 2.2 or later >> >>I guess it shouldn't get the "bad number" error if python is missing >>(and it is in this case). But we don't use QMTest anymore, correct? So >>isn't the python test obsolete? >> >> > >ERM, we removed those tests before the /dev/zero test went in so I'm a >little confused on how those messages are generated. If you look at >autoconf/* you'll find that neither python nor qmtest occur in any file. >What were you configuring when this message was generated? > >Reid. > > > >>_______________________________________________ >>LLVM Developers mailing list >>LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu >>http://mail.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev >> >>