libvirt users - Jan 2015 - Suggest to update python binding information on libvirt.org

Hello.
I am new libvirt user. I downloaded and compile the source code with
default configuration. I had a lot of trouble before finally found out that
python bindings is now a separated package.  However the web site still
states that python binding  is directly supported, and that  install extra
binding package when libvirt is installed as a binary package.
Please consider updating this misleading information.

Regards
Lingyu Zhu

On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 03:25:26PM +0800, Lingyu Zhu
wrote:
>Hello.
>I am new libvirt user. I downloaded and compile the source code with
>default configuration. I had a lot of trouble before finally found out that
>python bindings is now a separated package.  However the web site still
>states that python binding  is directly supported, and that  install extra
>binding package when libvirt is installed as a binary package.
>Please consider updating this misleading information.
>
Hi there, thank you for noticing us that there's some part of the
documentation that's not fixed yet.  Could you point us to the exact
place where you found this (mis)information?

Have a nice day,
Martin
>Regards
>Lingyu Zhu
>_______________________________________________
>libvirt-users mailing list
>libvirt-users@redhat.com
>https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvirt-users

Apologize for missing that URL: http://libvirt.org/bindings.html

By the way, Will the community apply for GSoC this year?

On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 4:26 PM, Martin Kletzander <mkletzan@redhat.com>
wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 03:25:26PM +0800, Lingyu Zhu wrote:
>
>> Hello.
>> I am new libvirt user. I downloaded and compile the source code with
>> default configuration. I had a lot of trouble before finally found out
>> that
>> python bindings is now a separated package.  However the web site still
>> states that python binding  is directly supported, and that  install
extra
>> binding package when libvirt is installed as a binary package.
>> Please consider updating this misleading information.
>>
>>
> Hi there, thank you for noticing us that there's some part of the
> documentation that's not fixed yet.  Could you point us to the exact
> place where you found this (mis)information?
>
> Have a nice day,
> Martin
>
>  Regards
>> Lingyu Zhu
>>
>
>  _______________________________________________
>> libvirt-users mailing list
>> libvirt-users@redhat.com
>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvirt-users
>>
>