Aaron Roberts
2017-Nov-27 13:18 UTC
[Gluster-users] ls performance on directories with small number of items
Hi,
I have a situation where an apache web server is trying to locate
the IndexDocument for a directory on a gluster volume. This URL is being hit
roughly 20 times per second. There is only 1 file in this directory. However,
the parent directory does have a large number of items (+123,000 files and dirs)
and we are performing operations to move these files into 2 levels of subdirs.
We are seeing very slow response times (around 8 seconds) in apache and also
when trying to ls on this dir. Before we started the migrations to move files
on the large parent dir into 2 sub levels, we weren't aware of a problem.
[root at web-02 images]# time ls -l dir1/get/ | wc -l
2
real 0m8.114s
user 0m0.002s
sys 0m0.014s
Other directories with only 1 item return very quickly (<1 sec).
[root at Web-01 images]# time ls -l dir1/tmp1/ | wc -l
2
real 0m0.014s
user 0m0.003s
sys 0m0.006s
I'm just trying to understand what would slow down this operation so much.
Is it the high frequency of attempts to read the directory (apache hits to
dir1/get/) ? Do the move operations on items in the parent directory have any
impact?
Some background info:
[root at web-02 images]# gluster --version
glusterfs 3.7.20 built on Jan 30 2017 15:39:29
Repository revision: git://git.gluster.com/glusterfs.git
Copyright (c) 2006-2011 Gluster Inc. <http://www.gluster.com>
GlusterFS comes with ABSOLUTELY NO WARRANTY.
You may redistribute copies of GlusterFS under the terms of the GNU General
Public License.
[root at web-02 images]# gluster vol info
Volume Name: web_vol1
Type: Replicate
Volume ID: 0d63de20-c9c2-4931-b4a3-6aed5ae28057
Status: Started
Number of Bricks: 1 x 2 = 2
Transport-type: tcp
Bricks:
Brick1: web-01:/export/brick1/web_vol1_brick1
Brick2: web-02:/export/brick1/web_vol1_brick1
Options Reconfigured:
performance.readdir-ahead: on
performance.io-thread-count: 32
performance.cache-size: 512MB
Any insight would be gratefully received.
Thanks,
Aaron
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-users/attachments/20171127/6a1eabe9/attachment.html>
Sam McLeod
2017-Nov-27 22:49 UTC
[Gluster-users] ls performance on directories with small number of items
Hi Aaron, We also find that Gluster is perhaps, not the most performant when performing actions on directories containing large numbers of files. For example, with a single NFS server on the client side a recursive chown on (many!) files took about 18 seconds, our simple two replica gluster servers took over 15 minutes. Having said that, while I'm new to the gluster world, things seem to be progressing quite quickly in regards to attempts to improve performance. I noticed you're running a _very_ old version of Gluster, I'd first suggest upgrading to the latest stable (3.12.x) and FYI 3.13 is to be release shortly. I'd also recommend ensuring the following setting is enabled: performance.stat-prefetch Further to this, additional information about the cluster / volume typology and configuration would help others assist you (but I still think you should upgrade!). -- Sam McLeod https://smcleod.net https://twitter.com/s_mcleod> On 28 Nov 2017, at 12:18 am, Aaron Roberts <aroberts at domicilium.com> wrote: > > Hi, > I have a situation where an apache web server is trying to locate the IndexDocument for a directory on a gluster volume. This URL is being hit roughly 20 times per second. There is only 1 file in this directory. However, the parent directory does have a large number of items (+123,000 files and dirs) and we are performing operations to move these files into 2 levels of subdirs. > > We are seeing very slow response times (around 8 seconds) in apache and also when trying to ls on this dir. Before we started the migrations to move files on the large parent dir into 2 sub levels, we weren?t aware of a problem. > > [root at web-02 images]# time ls -l dir1/get/ | wc -l > 2 > > real 0m8.114s > user 0m0.002s > sys 0m0.014s > > Other directories with only 1 item return very quickly (<1 sec). > > [root at Web-01 images]# time ls -l dir1/tmp1/ | wc -l > 2 > > real 0m0.014s > user 0m0.003s > sys 0m0.006s > > I?m just trying to understand what would slow down this operation so much. Is it the high frequency of attempts to read the directory (apache hits to dir1/get/) ? Do the move operations on items in the parent directory have any impact? > > Some background info: > > [root at web-02 images]# gluster --version > glusterfs 3.7.20 built on Jan 30 2017 15:39:29 > Repository revision: git://git.gluster.com/glusterfs.git <git://git.gluster.com/glusterfs.git> > Copyright (c) 2006-2011 Gluster Inc. <http://www.gluster.com <http://www.gluster.com/>> > GlusterFS comes with ABSOLUTELY NO WARRANTY. > You may redistribute copies of GlusterFS under the terms of the GNU General Public License. > > [root at web-02 images]# gluster vol info > > Volume Name: web_vol1 > Type: Replicate > Volume ID: 0d63de20-c9c2-4931-b4a3-6aed5ae28057 > Status: Started > Number of Bricks: 1 x 2 = 2 > Transport-type: tcp > Bricks: > Brick1: web-01:/export/brick1/web_vol1_brick1 > Brick2: web-02:/export/brick1/web_vol1_brick1 > Options Reconfigured: > performance.readdir-ahead: on > performance.io <http://performance.io/>-thread-count: 32 > performance.cache-size: 512MB > > > Any insight would be gratefully received. > > Thanks, > Aaron > > _______________________________________________ > Gluster-users mailing list > Gluster-users at gluster.org <mailto:Gluster-users at gluster.org> > http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users <http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users>-------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-users/attachments/20171128/4f687e47/attachment.html>
Joe Julian
2017-Nov-27 23:44 UTC
[Gluster-users] ls performance on directories with small number of items
Also note, Sam's example is comparing apples and orchards. Feeding one person from an orchard is not as efficient as feeding one person an apple, but if you're feeding 10000 people... Also in question with the NFS example, how long until that chown was flushed? How long until another client could see those changes? That is ignoring the biggie, what happens when the NFS server goes down? On November 27, 2017 2:49:23 PM PST, Sam McLeod <mailinglists at smcleod.net> wrote:>Hi Aaron, > >We also find that Gluster is perhaps, not the most performant when >performing actions on directories containing large numbers of files. >For example, with a single NFS server on the client side a recursive >chown on (many!) files took about 18 seconds, our simple two replica >gluster servers took over 15 minutes. >Having said that, while I'm new to the gluster world, things seem to be >progressing quite quickly in regards to attempts to improve >performance. > >I noticed you're running a _very_ old version of Gluster, I'd first >suggest upgrading to the latest stable (3.12.x) and FYI 3.13 is to be >release shortly. > >I'd also recommend ensuring the following setting is enabled: > >performance.stat-prefetch > >Further to this, additional information about the cluster / volume >typology and configuration would help others assist you (but I still >think you should upgrade!). > >-- >Sam McLeod >https://smcleod.net >https://twitter.com/s_mcleod > >> On 28 Nov 2017, at 12:18 am, Aaron Roberts <aroberts at domicilium.com> >wrote: >> >> Hi, >> I have a situation where an apache web server is >trying to locate the IndexDocument for a directory on a gluster volume. >This URL is being hit roughly 20 times per second. There is only 1 >file in this directory. However, the parent directory does have a >large number of items (+123,000 files and dirs) and we are performing >operations to move these files into 2 levels of subdirs. >> >> We are seeing very slow response times (around 8 seconds) in apache >and also when trying to ls on this dir. Before we started the >migrations to move files on the large parent dir into 2 sub levels, we >weren?t aware of a problem. >> >> [root at web-02 images]# time ls -l dir1/get/ | wc -l >> 2 >> >> real 0m8.114s >> user 0m0.002s >> sys 0m0.014s >> >> Other directories with only 1 item return very quickly (<1 sec). >> >> [root at Web-01 images]# time ls -l dir1/tmp1/ | wc -l >> 2 >> >> real 0m0.014s >> user 0m0.003s >> sys 0m0.006s >> >> I?m just trying to understand what would slow down this operation so >much. Is it the high frequency of attempts to read the directory >(apache hits to dir1/get/) ? Do the move operations on items in the >parent directory have any impact? >> >> Some background info: >> >> [root at web-02 images]# gluster --version >> glusterfs 3.7.20 built on Jan 30 2017 15:39:29 >> Repository revision: git://git.gluster.com/glusterfs.git ><git://git.gluster.com/glusterfs.git> >> Copyright (c) 2006-2011 Gluster Inc. <http://www.gluster.com ><http://www.gluster.com/>> >> GlusterFS comes with ABSOLUTELY NO WARRANTY. >> You may redistribute copies of GlusterFS under the terms of the GNU >General Public License. >> >> [root at web-02 images]# gluster vol info >> >> Volume Name: web_vol1 >> Type: Replicate >> Volume ID: 0d63de20-c9c2-4931-b4a3-6aed5ae28057 >> Status: Started >> Number of Bricks: 1 x 2 = 2 >> Transport-type: tcp >> Bricks: >> Brick1: web-01:/export/brick1/web_vol1_brick1 >> Brick2: web-02:/export/brick1/web_vol1_brick1 >> Options Reconfigured: >> performance.readdir-ahead: on >> performance.io <http://performance.io/>-thread-count: 32 >> performance.cache-size: 512MB >> >> >> Any insight would be gratefully received. >> >> Thanks, >> Aaron >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Gluster-users mailing list >> Gluster-users at gluster.org <mailto:Gluster-users at gluster.org> >> http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users ><http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users>-- Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-users/attachments/20171127/a19d2385/attachment.html>
Joe Julian
2017-Nov-29 16:16 UTC
[Gluster-users] ls performance on directories with small number of items
The -l flag is causing a metadata lookup for every file in the directory. The way the ls command does that it's with individual fstat calls to each directory entry. That's a lot of tiny network round trips with fops that don't even fill a standard frame thus each frame has a high percentage of overhead for tcp. Add to that the replica check to ensure you're not getting stale data and you have another round trip for each file. Your 123k directory entries require several frames of getdirent and over 492k frames for the individual fstat calls. That's roughly 16us per frame. Can you eliminate the fstat calls? If you only get the directory listing that should be significantly better. To prove this, do "echo *". You will instantly see your 123k entries. On November 27, 2017 5:18:56 AM PST, Aaron Roberts <aroberts at domicilium.com> wrote:>Hi, >I have a situation where an apache web server is trying to locate the >IndexDocument for a directory on a gluster volume. This URL is being >hit roughly 20 times per second. There is only 1 file in this >directory. However, the parent directory does have a large number of >items (+123,000 files and dirs) and we are performing operations to >move these files into 2 levels of subdirs. > >We are seeing very slow response times (around 8 seconds) in apache and >also when trying to ls on this dir. Before we started the migrations >to move files on the large parent dir into 2 sub levels, we weren't >aware of a problem. > >[root at web-02 images]# time ls -l dir1/get/ | wc -l >2 > >real 0m8.114s >user 0m0.002s >sys 0m0.014s > >Other directories with only 1 item return very quickly (<1 sec). > >[root at Web-01 images]# time ls -l dir1/tmp1/ | wc -l >2 > >real 0m0.014s >user 0m0.003s >sys 0m0.006s > >I'm just trying to understand what would slow down this operation so >much. Is it the high frequency of attempts to read the directory >(apache hits to dir1/get/) ? Do the move operations on items in the >parent directory have any impact? > >Some background info: > >[root at web-02 images]# gluster --version >glusterfs 3.7.20 built on Jan 30 2017 15:39:29 >Repository revision: git://git.gluster.com/glusterfs.git >Copyright (c) 2006-2011 Gluster Inc. <http://www.gluster.com> >GlusterFS comes with ABSOLUTELY NO WARRANTY. >You may redistribute copies of GlusterFS under the terms of the GNU >General Public License. > >[root at web-02 images]# gluster vol info > >Volume Name: web_vol1 >Type: Replicate >Volume ID: 0d63de20-c9c2-4931-b4a3-6aed5ae28057 >Status: Started >Number of Bricks: 1 x 2 = 2 >Transport-type: tcp >Bricks: >Brick1: web-01:/export/brick1/web_vol1_brick1 >Brick2: web-02:/export/brick1/web_vol1_brick1 >Options Reconfigured: >performance.readdir-ahead: on >performance.io-thread-count: 32 >performance.cache-size: 512MB > > >Any insight would be gratefully received. > >Thanks, > Aaron-- Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-users/attachments/20171129/6e95672d/attachment.html>
Aaron Roberts
2017-Nov-29 16:22 UTC
[Gluster-users] ls performance on directories with small number of items
Thanks Joe,
Just to clarify, I?m seeing 8 seconds to run ls -l in a dir
containing 2 files. I mentioned that the _parent_ dir contains 123k items, in
case it was relevant. Although it seems that the fact we are hitting the dir
with many requests seems to be the key factor.
Aaron
From: Joe Julian [mailto:joe at julianfamily.org]
Sent: 29 November 2017 16:16
To: gluster-users at gluster.org; Aaron Roberts <aroberts at
domicilium.com>; gluster-users at gluster.org
Subject: Re: [Gluster-users] ls performance on directories with small number of
items
The -l flag is causing a metadata lookup for every file in the directory. The
way the ls command does that it's with individual fstat calls to each
directory entry. That's a lot of tiny network round trips with fops that
don't even fill a standard frame thus each frame has a high percentage of
overhead for tcp. Add to that the replica check to ensure you're not getting
stale data and you have another round trip for each file. Your 123k directory
entries require several frames of getdirent and over 492k frames for the
individual fstat calls. That's roughly 16us per frame.
Can you eliminate the fstat calls? If you only get the directory listing that
should be significantly better. To prove this, do "echo *". You will
instantly see your 123k entries.
On November 27, 2017 5:18:56 AM PST, Aaron Roberts <aroberts at
domicilium.com<mailto:aroberts at domicilium.com>> wrote:
Hi,
I have a situation where an apache web server is trying to locate
the IndexDocument for a directory on a gluster volume. This URL is being hit
roughly 20 times per second. There is only 1 file in this directory. However,
the parent directory does have a large number of items (+123,000 files and dirs)
and we are performing operations to move these files into 2 levels of subdirs.
We are seeing very slow response times (around 8 seconds) in apache and also
when trying to ls on this dir. Before we started the migrations to move files
on the large parent dir into 2 sub levels, we weren?t aware of a problem.
[root at web-02 images]# time ls -l dir1/get/ | wc -l
2
real 0m8.114s
user 0m0.002s
sys 0m0.014s
Other directories with only 1 item return very quickly (<1 sec).
[root at Web-01 images]# time ls -l dir1/tmp1/ | wc -l
2
real 0m0.014s
user 0m0.003s
sys 0m0.006s
I?m just trying to understand what would slow down this operation so much. Is
it the high frequency of attempts to read the directory (apache hits to
dir1/get/) ? Do the move operations on items in the parent directory have any
impact?
Some background info:
[root at web-02 images]# gluster --version
glusterfs 3.7.20 built on Jan 30 2017 15:39:29
Repository revision: git://git.gluster.com/glusterfs.git
Copyright (c) 2006-2011 Gluster Inc. <http://www.gluster.com>
GlusterFS comes with ABSOLUTELY NO WARRANTY.
You may redistribute copies of GlusterFS under the terms of the GNU General
Public License.
[root at web-02 images]# gluster vol info
Volume Name: web_vol1
Type: Replicate
Volume ID: 0d63de20-c9c2-4931-b4a3-6aed5ae28057
Status: Started
Number of Bricks: 1 x 2 = 2
Transport-type: tcp
Bricks:
Brick1: web-01:/export/brick1/web_vol1_brick1
Brick2: web-02:/export/brick1/web_vol1_brick1
Options Reconfigured:
performance.readdir-ahead: on
performance.io-thread-count: 32
performance.cache-size: 512MB
Any insight would be gratefully received.
Thanks,
Aaron
--
Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-users/attachments/20171129/1a9bbfa1/attachment.html>