similar to: how to label customized y axis when using lattice parallel parameter common.scale=TRUE

What do you mean by test case please ? Using the following commands to compile mcf program can reproduce such issue all the time. Probably it is my version's problem. Because I checked out 3.3version from SVN before published. Could you tell me where Manman modified ? I cannot port to new version very quickly after changing it a lot already. Thanks, - Pengcheng On Nov 5, 2013, at

Hi, What version of clang are you using? I think r174785 is the fix. Manman On Tue, Nov 5, 2013 at 11:04 AM, lipengcheng <pli at cs.rochester.edu> wrote: > What do you mean by test case please ? Using the following commands to > compile mcf program > can reproduce such issue all the time. > > Probably it is my version's problem. Because I checked out 3.3version from

Also r174479. Manman On Tue, Nov 5, 2013 at 11:11 AM, Manman Ren <manman.ren at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > What version of clang are you using? I think r174785 is the fix. > > Manman > > > On Tue, Nov 5, 2013 at 11:04 AM, lipengcheng <pli at cs.rochester.edu> wrote: > >> What do you mean by test case please ? Using the following commands to

Yep. I tried it. It used a movabsq instruction instead and a static allocation. Thanks a lot. I will read it immediately. Again thanks. - Pengcheng On Nov 6, 2013, at 1:45 PM, Tim Northover <t.p.northover at gmail.com> wrote: >> If you also give "-code-model=large" then LLVM won't assume that >> "addr" is nearby so it'll use a movabsq with a

Hi, I have seen and heard many cases of ext3 corrupted after abnormal powerdown (e.g. missing all the files in one directory). yes, UPS should help, but wonder what kind of worst scenario will ext3 present after powerdown. messed up meta data has been seen in many cases, for example, the in-direct block of one inode contains garbage, which causes the automatic fsck failed to work and user has

Hello LLVM, I encountered the following bugs when I compiled my program in debug version. Could someone help me with that ? Really appreciate that. Thanks, Take the mcf program in SPEC2K6 as example. The compiling options are : clang -O0 -c -emit-llvm -o obj/mcf.o -g -DSPEC_CPU mcf.c llvm-link -o mcf.bc obj/mcf.o opt -o mcf.opt.bc mcf.bc -O2 llc -O0 -relocation-model=static -o mcf.s

This is from work that Manman did. I thought she'd fixed this particular issue though. Can you file a bug with a test case please? On Nov 5, 2013 10:10 AM, "lipengcheng" <pli at cs.rochester.edu> wrote: > Hello LLVM, > > I encountered the following bugs when I compiled my program in debug > version. > Could someone help me with that ? Really appreciate that.

Hi LLVM, When I compile code using llc with options " -relocation-model=static", the generated code still has relative addressing using *rip* frame pointer. May I know how to get rid of frame pointer and totally using absolute addressing ? E.g. callq *addr(%rip). Here *addr* is a global variable, and I want the global address shows up here, instead of relative addressing.

I need to make a fairly complex animated graphic and decided to use grid for it. A very simple example of what I need: ##============================================================================== library(grid) grid.newpage() pushViewport(plotViewport()) pushViewport(viewport(xscale = extendrange(c(0, 100)), yscale = extendrange(c(0, 100)))) grid.xaxis() grid.yaxis()

Hello dear developers, I find myself often having the result of "range" oder "extendrange", which I want to create a sequence with. But "seq" needs two seperate arguments "from" and "two". Could an argument "range" be added? Otherwise I will have to create an object with the range (may come from a longer calculation), index twice from

Dear all, Could you please give me a hand on parallel function from package lattice? On the R command console, the following commands can output a parallel coordinate plot to the pdf file. library(lattice); pdf("trial.pdf"); data(iris); parallel(~iris[1:4] | Species, iris); dev.off(); However, if these commands are encapsulated into a function, the resultant pdf file is empty.

How can I insert mathematical expressions for variable names in a lattice parallel plot? I tried to implement mathematical expressions in varnames, however, without success. For example, neither parallel(~iris[1:4] | Species, iris, varnames=c("P[Width]", "Petal[length]", "alpha[Width]", "Sepal[Length]")) nor parallel(~iris[1:4] | Species,

Hello, I would like to plot : barplot(c(10,12,18)) and plot(c(0,2,3), t="l") and many other plots... in a same scale. With par(new=T) it's not align, points are not in the middle of the bar of barplot. Is there an easely solution to align that ? Thank for you help, G [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

Dear All, Would you please tell me how to display the sample No. on the map ? ---Below commands don't display the sample No.(from 1 to 150).--- library(som) library(klaR) iris.som3 <- som(iris[,1:4], xdim = 14,ydim = 6) library(klaR); opar<- par(xpd = NA) shardsplot(iris.som3, data.or = iris,label = TRUE) legend(3.5,14.3, col = rainbow(3), xjust =0.5, yjust = 0,legend =

Is this a bug? I thought that "clipboard" could always be substituted for a filename when dealing with ASCII files. > data(iris) > save(iris,ascii=TRUE,file="clipboard") Error in file(file, "wb") : `mode' for the clipboard must be `r' or `w' Also this (where gclip is a utility found at unxutils.sourceforge.net that copies its standard input to the

> If you also give "-code-model=large" then LLVM won't assume that > "addr" is nearby so it'll use a movabsq with a static relocation. Actually, it seems our own Eli has written rather a good description of these code models: http://eli.thegreenplace.net/2012/01/03/understanding-the-x64-code-models/. Well worth the read (the default models he talks about at the

Hi, I often need to extend the plot range to the right, but not to the left (for example: not below 0 so that log = "x" still works...). This could be a handy improvement of extendrange(): --- utils.R 2015-08-25 18:18:20.000000000 -0400 +++ utils.R 2018-04-25 17:21:25.000000000 -0400 @@ -30,6 +30,6 @@ ## Purpose: extend a range by a factor 'f' - on each side

I'm exploring latency overhead of parallel PSOCK workers and noticed that serializing/unserializing data back to the main R session is significantly slower on Linux than it is on Windows/MacOS with similar hardware. Is there a reason for this difference and is there a way to avoid the apparent additional Linux overhead? I attempted to isolate the behavior with a test that simply returns

On Mon, 2 Nov 2020 at 02:22, Simon Urbanek <simon.urbanek at r-project.org> wrote: > > It looks like R sockets on Linux could do with TCP_NODELAY -- without (status quo): How many network packets are generated with and without it? If there are many small writes and thus setting TCP_NODELAY causes many small packets to be sent, it might make more sense to set TCP_QUICKACK instead.

Dear all, How can I make an index plot with lattice, that is plotting a vector simply against its particular index in the vector, i.e. something similar to y <- rnorm(10) plot(y) I don't want to specify the x's manually, as this could become cumbersome when having multiple panels. I tried something like library(lattice) mp <- function(x, y, ...) { x <- 1:length(y)