Displaying 20 results from an estimated 700 matches similar to: "Creating multiple vector/list names-novice"
2007 Apr 10
0
(PR#9606) R CMD Rdconv drops sections: arguments, seealso,
Ny understanding was that Insightful had been asked to provide patches fo
this.
We look forward to receiving them.
On Tue, 10 Apr 2007, timh at insightful.com wrote:
> I've created a .Rd file (below), then converted that to .sgml using
> R CMD Rdconv --type=Ssgm combn.Rd > combn.sgml
> The output (shown below) is missing some of the sections:
> arguments
> seealso
2007 Apr 10
1
R CMD Rdconv drops sections: arguments, seealso, examples (PR#9606)
I've created a .Rd file (below), then converted that to .sgml using
R CMD Rdconv --type=Ssgm combn.Rd > combn.sgml
The output (shown below) is missing some of the sections:
arguments
seealso
examples
If instead I convert to .d (below), the same sections are missing,
and the "note" section is included but without the necessary newline.
2012 Nov 16
1
pairing data using combn with criteria
Dear All,
I have a dataframe made up of individual beetles consisting of individual
number, family number, mother's family number, father's family number, and
sex of the beetle. I would like to pair up the individuals for breeding. I
would, however, like to avoid breeding beetles of the same sex (obviously),
the same family, and with the same mother's family or father's family,
2007 Apr 30
1
R CMD Rdconv drops sections: arguments, seealso, examples (PR#9645)
On Tue, 10 Apr 2007 timh at insightful.com wrote:
> I've created a .Rd file (below), then converted that to .sgml using
> R CMD Rdconv --type=Ssgm combn.Rd > combn.sgml
> The output (shown below) is missing some of the sections:
> arguments
> seealso
> examples
> If instead I convert to .d (below), the same sections are missing,
> and the "note"
2007 Apr 20
1
simply this loop?
Hi, anyone interested in this:
I tried to simply this loop with lapply or something but haven't figured it out:
mapt = c("203929_s_at", "203930_s_at", "203928_x_at", "206401_s_at")
mapt.combn <- lapply(1:4, function(i) combn(mapt, i))
out = list()
k = 1
for (i in 1:length(mapt.combn)){
for (j in 1:ncol(mapt.combn[[i]])){
out[[k]] =
2010 Mar 26
2
More efficient alternative to combn()?
Hi,
i am working on a problem where i need to compute the products of all
possible combinations of size m of the elements of a vector. I know that
this can be achieved using the function combn(), e.g.:
> vector <- 1:6
> combn(x = vector, m = 3, FUN = function(y) prod(y))
In my case the vector has 2000 elements and i need to compute the values
specified above for m = 32. Using combn() i
2013 Sep 06
1
Importing function that is previously imported by other package
Dear developeRs,
I encounter the following problem: in the current version of my package
FrF2, certain calls to a functioni do not work when package combinat is
loaded, because function combn from combinat masks the function from
utils that my package uses.
I tried to solve this issue by importing function combn into the
namespace of FrF2; I don't need to export it, I just want to use it
2010 Nov 17
1
efficient conversion of matrix column rows to list elements
Hi List,
I'm hoping to get opinions for enhancing the efficiency of the following
code designed to take a vector of probabilities (outcomes) and calculate a
union of the probability space. As part of the union calculation, combn()
must be used, which returns a matrix, and the parallelized version of
lapply() provided in the multicore package requires a list. I've found that
2006 May 09
1
combn(n, k, ...) and all its re-inventions
It seems people are reinventing the wheel here:
The goal is to generate all combinations of 1:n of size k.
This (typically) results in a matrix of size k * choose(n,k)
i.e. needs O(n ^ k) space, hence is only applicable to
relatively small k.
Then alternatives have been devised to generate the combinations
"one by one", and I think I remember there has been a
quiz/challenge about 20
2006 Jan 30
2
yet another vectorization question
Dear R-helpers,
I'm trying to develop a function which specifies all possible expressions that
can be formed using a certain number of variables. For example, with three
variables A, B and C we can have
- presence/absence of A; B and C
- presence/absence of combinations of two of them
- presence/absence of all three
A B C
1 0
2 1
3 0
4 1
5 0
6 1
2009 Sep 21
2
Combine vectors in order to form matrixes with combn
Hello!
I've a problem with the combn function and a set of vector. I
would like to make a simple combination where, instead of scalars, i
would like to combine vector, in order to form matrixes.
In other
words, i have nineteen 6-items vectors (for example coef1-coef19), that
i would like to combine in n!/k!(n-k)! 6x6 matrixes.
I tried with a
code like this
mma <-
2010 May 08
2
apply a function on elements of a list two by two
Dear all,
I want to apply a function to list elements, two by two. I hoped that combn
would help me out, but I can't get it to work. A nested for-loop works, but
seems highly inefficient when you have large lists. Is there a more
efficient way of approaching this?
# Make some toy data
data(iris)
test <- vector("list",3)
for (i in 1:3){
x <- levels(iris$Species)[i]
tmp
2010 Apr 07
1
combn with factors
Dear list,
I have come across this issue:
combn(letters[1:5], 3)
[,1] [,2] [,3] [,4] [,5] [,6] [,7] [,8] [,9] [,10]
[1,] "a" "a" "a" "a" "a" "a" "b" "b" "b" "c"
[2,] "b" "b" "b" "c" "c" "d" "c"
2011 Oct 16
1
multicore combn
This is a 'rather than re-invent the wheel' post. Has anyone out there
re-written combn so that it can be parallelized - with multicore, snow, or
otherwise? I have a job that requires large numbers of combinations, and
rather than get all of the index values, then crank it through mclapply, I
was wondering if there was a way to just do this natively within a function.
Just curious.
2011 Jan 10
1
Using combn
Dear list,
I want to apply the "table" function to every pair of variables in df
and the return should be a list.
setwd(123)
asd <- data.frame(a1=sample(1:4, 20, replace=TRUE),
a2=sample(1:4, 20, replace=TRUE),
a3=sample(1:4, 20, replace=TRUE),
a4=sample(1:4, 20, replace=TRUE))
with(asd, table(a1, a2))
with(asd, table(a1,
2009 Apr 06
3
how to subsample all possible combinations of n species taken 1:n at a time?
Hello
I apologise for the length of this entry but please bear with me.
In short:
I need a way of subsampling communities from all possible communities of n
taxa taken 1:n at a time without having to calculate all possible
combinations (because this gives me a memory error - using
combn() or expand.grid() at least). Does anyone know of a function? Or can
you help me edit the
combn
or
2008 Jul 03
1
Problem in applying conditional looping
Respected All,
I hope you are enjoying good health, I am tring to write a program in R but
could not be very sucessful. My program draws random sample form bivariate
normal distribution and then compute a variable PIJ. For certian samples
some entries of variable PIJ is apearing as negative, which result
in negative variance estimator. I want to introduce a loop in my program
that verify the each
2008 Feb 08
2
Applying lm to data with combn
http://www.nabble.com/file/p15359204/test.data.csv
http://www.nabble.com/file/p15359204/test.data.csv test.data.csv
Hi,
I have used apply to have certian combinations, but when I try to use these
combinations I get the error
[Error in eval(expr, envir, enclos) : object "X.GDAXI" not found]. being a
novice I donot understand that after applying combination to the data I cant
access
2010 Mar 11
1
combinations/ indexing a matrix
For a package application, I want to generate all 1-way, or 2-way, ...
combinations of factors, symbolically, as a matrix.
E.g., all two-way terms among 4 factors.
> factors <- LETTERS[1:4]
> combn(4,2)
[,1] [,2] [,3] [,4] [,5] [,6]
[1,] 1 1 1 2 2 3
[2,] 2 3 4 3 4 4
But I want to replace the numbers I in the above by factors[I]. I know
I
2010 Nov 01
4
how to view the top 20 lines in a long dataset
Hi,
I am simply looking for the function that will allow you to look at the top
20 lines of a long dataset?
LP
On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 10:46 AM, Louis Plough <lplough@usc.edu> wrote:
> Hi,
> I am trying to generate all possible permutations (choose 2) of a vector,
> b, for example--using 'combn' the combinations in only one direction are
> generated...
>
> >