similar to: Clarks 2Dt function in R

Hey, So I have a scatter plot and I am trying to plot a curve to fit the data based on a Holling Type III functional response. My function is this: nll2<-function(a,b) { conefun<-(a*DBH^2)/(b^2+DBH^2) nlls2<-dnbinom(x=cones ,size=DBH, mu=conefun,log=TRUE) -sum(nlls) } and my plot is this: plot (DBH,cones) DBH is on the x-axis and cones is on the y-axis. How do I get the curve

Hi, I am trying to run a generalized linear regression using a negative binomial error distribution. However, I want to use an overdispersion parameter that varies (dependent on the length of a stretch of road) so glm.nb will not do. >From what I've read I should be able to do this using GLM by specifying my own quasi family and describing the variance function using varfun, validmu,

Hi there, I have been having trouble running negative binomial regression (glm.nb) using library MASS in R v2.15.0 on Mac OSX. I am running multiple models on the variables influencing the group size of damselfish in coral reefs (count data). For total group size and two of my species, glm.nb is working great to deal with overdispersion in my count data. For two of my species, I am getting a

I'm getting an error message when using the new version of sqldf, > library(sqldf) > str(kdv) 'data.frame': 71 obs. of 3 variables: $ dpss: num 0.117 0.144 0.164 0.166 0.165 ... $ npdp: num 0.1264 0.0325 0.0109 0.0033 0.0055 ... $ logk: num 1.12 1.29 1.41 1.41 1.42 ... > test=sqldf("select * from kdv") Error in get("fun", env = this, inherits =

Hello, I am trying to run a logistic regression with random effects on proportional data in glmmBUGS. I am a newcomer to this package, and wondered if anyone could help me specify the model correctly. I am trying to specify the response variable, /yseed/, as # of successes out of total observations... but I suspect that given the error below, that is not correct. Also, Newsect should be a

Hi I'm trying to replicate Smith et al.'s (http://www.sciencemag.org/content/330/6008/1216.abstract) findings by fitting their Gompertz and logistic models to their data (given in their supplement). I'm doing this as I want to then apply the equations to my own data. Try as a might, I can't quite replicate them. Any thoughts why are much appreciated. I've tried contacting the

Dear all, I have a quasipoisson glm for which I need confidence bands in a graphic: gm6 <- glm(num_leaves ~ b_dist_min_new, family = quasipoisson, data = beva) summary(gm6) library('VIM') b_dist_min_new <- as.numeric(prepare(beva$dist_min, scaling="classical", transformation="logarithm")). My first steps for the solution are following: range(b_dist_min_new)

Hello, Any advice or pointers for implementing Sobel's test for mediation in 2-level model setting? For fitting the hierarchical models, I am using "lme4" but could also revert to "nlme" since it is a relatively simple varying intercept model and they yield identical estimates. I apologize for this is an R question with an embedded statistical question. I noticed that a

Hi, I am performing meta-regression using linear mixed-effect model with the lme() function that has two fixed effect variables;one as a log transformed variable (x) and one as factor (y) variable, and two nested random intercept terms. I want to save the predicted values from that model and show the log curve in a plot ; predicted~log(x) mod<-lme(B~log(x)+as.factor(y),

In Venables \& Ripley 3rd edition (p. 231) the proportional odds model is described as: logit(p<=k) = zeta_k + eta but polr apparently thinks there is a minus in front of eta, as is apprent below. Is this a bug og a feature I have overlooked? Here is the naked code for reproduction, below the results. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ --- version

Hi (R 2.13.1, OSX 10.6.8) I am trying to use predict.rma with continuous and categorical variables. The argument newmods in predict.rma seems to handle coviariates, but appears to falter on factors. While I realise that the coefficients for factors provide the answers, the goal is to eventually use predict.rma with ANCOVA type model with an interaction. Here is a self contained example

Hi, there I'm currently trying to figure out how to keep my "factor" levels for a variable when moving it from one data frame or matrix to another. Example below: vec1<-(rep("10",5)) vec2<-(rep("30",5)) vec3<-(rep("80",5)) vecs<-c(vec1, vec2, vec3) resp<-rnorm(2,15) dat<-as.data.frame(cbind(resp, vecs))

Hi there, I'm sure there's an easy answer to this, and I can't wait to see it. The question: is there an easy way to sort a data frame by it's row names? My dilemma: I've had to pull apart a data frame, run it through a loop to do some calculations and generate new variables, and then re-construct the chunks back into a data frame at the end. Doing this preserves the row

Hello, I'm analysing reaction time data from a linguistic experiment (a variant of a lexical decision task). To ascertain that the data was normally distributed, I used *shapiro.test *for each participant (see commands below), but only one out of 21 returns a p value above p.0 05. > f = function(dfr) return(shapiro.test(dfr$Target.RTinv)$p.value) > p = as.vector(by(newdat,

Dear Alina If I understand you correctly you cannot just have a single predicted curve but one for each level of your factor. On 09/08/2017 16:24, Alina Vodonos Zilberg wrote: > Hi, > > I am performing meta-regression using linear mixed-effect model with the > lme() function that has two fixed effect variables;one as a log > transformed variable (x) and one as factor (y)

hi netters, I'm a newbie to R and there are some very simple problems puzzeled me for two days. I've a dataframe here with several columns different in modes. Two of the columns are special for me: column 1 has the mode "factor" and column 2 has the mode "numeric vectors". The values for column 1 are either "T" or "F". I wanna do two things:

Dear useRs, I am using the gamm function in the mgcv package to model a smooth relationship between a covariate and my dependent variable, while allowing for quantification of the subjectwise variability in the smooths. What I would like to do is to make subjectwise predictions for plotting purposes which account for the random smooth components of the fit. An example. (sessionInfo() is at

I have a dataframe that contains fields such as patid, labdate, labvalue. The same patid may show up in multiple rows because of lab measurements on multiple days. Is there a simple way to obtain just the first and last record for each patient, or do I need to write some code that performs that. Thanks, Steven

Thank you Michael, Curves for each level of the factor sounds very interesting, Do you have a suggestion how to plot them? Thank you! Alina *Alina Vodonos Zilberg* On Thu, Aug 10, 2017 at 7:39 AM, Michael Dewey <lists at dewey.myzen.co.uk> wrote: > Dear Alina > > If I understand you correctly you cannot just have a single predicted > curve but one for each level of your

Hi, I am comparing the observed and fitted values of my GAM model, which includes the explanatory variables: longitude, depth, ssh, year and month. When I compare observed and fitted values for longitude, depth and ssh it works. But when I try to do it for month and year (which are as factors in the GAM model) it doesn't work. My observed and fitted values are exactly the same.. How is that