similar to: Baseline terms for lrm

1) How does one capture the plots from the plsmo procedure? Simply inserting a routing call to a graphical device (such as jpeg, png, etc) and then running the plsmo procedure (and then dev.off()) does not route the output to the file system. 1b) Related to above, has anyone thought of revising the plsmo procedure to use ggplot? I'd like to capture several such graphs into a faceted

? Hallo, which function can i use to do (baseline) logistic regression + goodness of fit tests? so far i found: # logistic on binary data lrm combined with resid(model,'gof') # logistic on binary data glm with no gof-test # baseline logit on binary data

The code library(Design) f <- lrm(y~x1+x2+x1*x2, data=data) plot(f) produces a plot of log odds vs x2 with 0.95 confidence intervals. How do I get a plot of odds ratios vs x2 instead? Thanks -- View this message in context: http://r.789695.n4.nabble.com/Odds-ratios-from-lrm-plot-tp4033340p4033340.html Sent from the R help mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Dear all, I am using the publically available GustoW dataset. The exact version I am using is available here: https://drive.google.com/open?id=0B4oZ2TQA0PAoUm85UzBFNjZ0Ulk I would like to produce a nomogram for 5 covariates - AGE, HYP, KILLIP, HRT and ANT. I have successfully fitted a logistic regression model using the "glm" function as shown below. library(rms) gusto <-

Hi, I am trying to run a simple logistic regression using lrm() to calculate a odds ratio. I found a confusing output when I use summary() on the fit object which gave some OR that is totally different from simply taking exp(coefficient), see below: > dat<-read.table("dat.txt",sep='\t',header=T,row.names=NULL) > d<-datadist(dat) > options(datadist='d')

> On Sep 14, 2017, at 12:30 AM, Bonnett, Laura <L.J.Bonnett at liverpool.ac.uk> wrote: > > Dear all, > > I am using the publically available GustoW dataset. The exact version I am using is available here: https://drive.google.com/open?id=0B4oZ2TQA0PAoUm85UzBFNjZ0Ulk > > I would like to produce a nomogram for 5 covariates - AGE, HYP, KILLIP, HRT and ANT. I have

Hi, I am running a logistic regression model using lrm library and I get the following error when I run the command: mod1 <- lrm(death ~ factor(score), x=T, y=T, data = env1) Unable to fit model using ?lrm.fit? where score is a numeric variable from 0 to 6. LRM executes fine for the following commands: mod1 <- lrm(death ~ score, x=T, y=T, data = env1) mod1<- lrm(death ~

What causes the error report: logical(0) to arise in the rms function lrm? Here's my data: But both the dependent and the independent variable seem fine... > str(AABB) 'data.frame': 1176425 obs. of 9 variables: $ sex : int 1 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 ... $ faint : int 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ... Here's the simplified model and error AABB$model1 < lrm (faint ~ sex)

Fixed 'maxiter' in the help file. Thanks. Please give the original source of that dataset. That dataset is a tiny sample of GUSTO-I and not large enough to fit this model very reliably. A nomogram using the full dataset (not publicly available to my knowledge) is already available in http://biostat.mc.vanderbilt.edu/tmp/bbr.pdf Use lrm, not lrm.fit for this. Adding maxit=20 will

Hi all I have run into a case where I don't understand why predict.lrm and predict.glm don't yield the same results. My data look like this: set.seed(1) library(Design); ilogit <- function(x) { 1/(1+exp(-x)) } ORDER <- factor(sample(c("mc-sc", "sc-mc"), 403, TRUE)) CONJ <- factor(sample(c("als", "bevor", "nachdem",

Can anyone tell me what I might be doing incorrectly for an ordinal logistic regression for lrm? I cannot get R(2.9.1)to run either summary nor will it let me bootstrp to validate. ### Y is a 5 value measure with a range from 1-5, the independent variables are the same. N=75 but when we knock out the NAs it comes down to 51#### > lrm(formula = Y ~ permemp + rev + gconec + scorpstat, data =

I have a logistic regression model I'm trying to do k-fold cross validation on. The number of observations is approximately 550 and an event rate of about 30% Does anyone have a recommendation for a B value to use for this data set? -- View this message in context: http://r.789695.n4.nabble.com/recommendation-on-B-for-validate-lrm-tp3486200p3486200.html Sent from the R help mailing list

Dear all, my aim is to estimate the efficacy over time of a treatment for headache prevention. Data consist of long sequences of repeated binary outcomes (1 if the subject has at least 1 episode of headache , 0 otherwise) on subjects randomized to placebo or treatment. I have fit a logistic regression model with Huber-White cluster sandwich covariance estimator. I have put in the model the

Hi all, I have another question about the lrm function (from the rms library) that I cannot find the answer to. I get an error message when I try to fit a model, and I don't know what to make of it. Please forgive me for not having a toy example, but it appears the size and complexity of my data is somehow causing the error. The best I can do is show you what I type and what errors I get.

Hi, I would like to extract the coefficients of a logistic regression (estimates and standard error as well) in lrm as in glm with summary(fit.glm)$coef Thanks David

Hi! Does anyone know how to do the test for goodness of fit of a logistic model (in rms package) after running fit.mult.impute? I am using the rms and Hmisc packages to do a multiple imputation followed by a logistic regression model using lrm. Everything works fine until I try to run the test for goodness of fit: residuals(type=c("gof")) One needs to specify y=T and x=T in the fit. But

Hello I'm using logistic regression from the Design library (lrm), then fastbw to undertake a backward selection and create a reduced model, before trying to make predictions against an independent set of data using predict.lrm with the reduced model. I wouldn't normally use this method, but I'm contrasting the results with an AIC/MMI approach. The script contains: # Determine full

I'm trying to obtain the robust standard errors for a multinomial ordered logit model: mod6 <- lrm(wdlshea ~ initdesch + concap + capasst + qualrat + terrain,data=full2) The model is fine but when I try to get the RSE I get an error. coeftest(mod6, vcov = vcovHAC(mod6)) Error in match.arg(type) : 'arg' should be one of “ordinary”, “score”, “score.binary”, “pearson”,

Hi R-helpers I have a dataframe DF (lets say with the variables, y, x1, x2, x3, ..., clust) containing relatively many NAs. When I fit an ordinal regression model with the function lrm from the Design library: model.lrm <- lrm(y ~ x1 + x2, data=DF, x=TRUE, y=TRUE) it will by default delete missing values in the variables y, x1, x2. Based on model.lrm, I want to apply the robust covariance

Hi everyone, I'm doing a logistic regression with an ordinal variable. I'd like to set the contrasts on the ordinal variable. However, when I set the contrasts, they work for ordinary linear regression (lm), but not logistic regression (lrm): ddist = datadist(bin.time, exp.loc) options(datadist='ddist') contrasts(exp.loc) = contr.treatment(3, base = 3, contrasts = TRUE) lrm.loc =