similar to: Number of variables in lrm (Design)

Hi, A error message arose while I was trying to fit a ordinal model with lrm() I am using R 2.8 with Design package. Here is a small set of mydata: RC RS Sex CovA CovB CovC CovD CovE 2 1 0 1 1 0 -0.005575280 2 2 1 0 1 0 1 -0.001959580 2 3 0 0 0 1 0 -0.004725880 2 0 0 0 1 0 0 -0.005504850 2 2 1 1 0 0 0 -0.003880170 1 2 1 0 0 1 0 -0.006074230 2 2 1 0 0 1 1 -0.003963920 2 2 1 0 0 1 0

Dear list, I am relatively new to ordinal models and have been working through the example given by Frank Harrell in the predict.lrm {Design} help All of this makes sense to me, except for the responses, i,e how do i interpret them? i would be extremely grateful if someone could explain the results? First i establish the date and model - > y <- factor(sample(1:3, 400, TRUE), 1:3,

Dear R-helpers, I'm having a problem in using plot.design in Design Library. Tho following example code produce the error: > n <- 1000 # define sample size > set.seed(17) # so can reproduce the results > age <- rnorm(n, 50, 10) > blood.pressure <- rnorm(n, 120, 15) > cholesterol <- rnorm(n, 200, 25) > sex <-

Hi R, I am getting this error while trying to use 'lrm' function with nine independent variables: > res = lrm(y1994~WC08301+WC08376+WC08316+WC08311+WC01001+WC08221+WC08106+WC0810 1+WC08231,data=y) singular information matrix in lrm.fit (rank= 8 ). Offending variable(s): WC08101 WC08221 Error in j:(j + params[i] - 1) : NA/NaN argument Now, if I take choose only four

Dear List, I have two questions about how to do predictions using lrm, specifically how to predict the ordinal response for each observation *individually*. I'm very new to cumulative odds models, so my apologies if my questions are too basic. I have a dataset with 4000 observations. Each observation consists of an ordinal outcome y (i.e., rating of a stimulus with four possible

I have a set of data that is not normally distributed and for which I need to build a model. So, I tried the lrm function from the design-package. The first run went well, and I got the following results: Wald Statistics Response: RVCL2PROC.mott Factor Chi-Square d.f. P TTV.mott (Factor+Higher Order Factors) 69.01 4

Sent this mail in rich text format before. Excuse me for this. ------------------------ Dear all, I'm using the lrm function from the package "Design", and I want to extract the p-values from the results of that function. Given an lrm object constructed as follows : fit <- lrm(Y~(X1+X2+X3+X4+X5+X6+X7)^2, data=dataset) I need the p-values for the coefficients printed by calling

Hello, I have question regarding the lrm function and estimating the odds ratio between different levels of a factored variable. The following code example illustrates the problem I am having. I have a data set with an outcome variable (0,1) and an input variable (A,B,C). I would like to estimate the effect of C vs B, but when I perform the summary I only get A vs B and A vs C, even though I

Hello I'm using logistic regression from the Design library (lrm), then fastbw to undertake a backward selection and create a reduced model, before trying to make predictions against an independent set of data using predict.lrm with the reduced model. I wouldn't normally use this method, but I'm contrasting the results with an AIC/MMI approach. The script contains: # Determine full

Dear all: When I am trying to get the marginal effects: summary(result7,adv_inc_ratio=mean(m9201 $adv_inc_ratio),adv_price_ratio=mean(m9201$adv_price_ratio), ...(SOME MORE CONTINUOUS AND DISCRETE VARIABLES BUT I AM NOT LISTING)... regW=c (0,mean(m9201$regW),1), regWM=c(0,mean(m9201$regWM),1)) It gave out an error message: Error in summary.Design(result7, adv_inc_ratio = mean(m9201

Hi, I've come across a strange error when using the lrm.fit function and the subsequent predict function. The model is created very quickly and can be verified by printing it on the console. Everything looks good. (In fact, the performance measures are rather nice.) Then, I want to use the model to predict some values. I get the following error: "fit was not created by a Design

Dear List, I am familier with binary models, however i am now trying to get predictions from a ordinal model and have a question. I have a data set made up of 12 categorical predictors, the response variable is classed as 1,2,3,4,5,6, this relates to threat level of the species ( on the IUCN rating). Previously i have combined levels 1 and 2 to form = non threatened and then combined 3-6 to

Dear guRus, I am doing a logistic regression using restricted cubic splines via rcs(). However, the fitted probabilities should be nondecreasing with increasing predictor. Example: predictor <- seq(1,20) y <- c(rep(0,9),rep(1,10),0) model <- glm(y~rcs(predictor,n.knots=3),family="binomial") print(1/(1+exp(-predict(model)))) The last expression should be a nondecreasing

Fixed 'maxiter' in the help file. Thanks. Please give the original source of that dataset. That dataset is a tiny sample of GUSTO-I and not large enough to fit this model very reliably. A nomogram using the full dataset (not publicly available to my knowledge) is already available in http://biostat.mc.vanderbilt.edu/tmp/bbr.pdf Use lrm, not lrm.fit for this. Adding maxit=20 will

Hi, 1. I want 95% not 99% confidence intervals in my summary.Design plot using the Design package. Putting conf.int=.95 as an argument in plot does not work. The default appears to be .99 not .95 as stated in the package Design manual (p. 164). 2. My sweave chuck is below and my output is attached as well as linked here: http://www.sonoma.edu/users/s/stanny/330A/project/ciplot.pdf 3.

> On Sep 14, 2017, at 12:30 AM, Bonnett, Laura <L.J.Bonnett at liverpool.ac.uk> wrote: > > Dear all, > > I am using the publically available GustoW dataset. The exact version I am using is available here: https://drive.google.com/open?id=0B4oZ2TQA0PAoUm85UzBFNjZ0Ulk > > I would like to produce a nomogram for 5 covariates - AGE, HYP, KILLIP, HRT and ANT. I have

Dear all, just a quick question regarding weights in logistic regression. I do results <- lrm(y.js ~ h.hhsize + h.death1 + h.ill1 + h.ljob1 + h.fin1 + h.div1 + h.fail1 + h.sex + h.ch.1

Hi, I am trying to run a simple logistic regression using lrm() to calculate a odds ratio. I found a confusing output when I use summary() on the fit object which gave some OR that is totally different from simply taking exp(coefficient), see below: > dat<-read.table("dat.txt",sep='\t',header=T,row.names=NULL) > d<-datadist(dat) > options(datadist='d')

Dear all, this might be not only an R-question but also a statistical. When I do a logistic regression analysis (species distribution modeling) with function lrm (Design package) I get the follwoing error message: > tadl1<-lrm(triad~fd+dista+fd2+dista2+fd:dista+dista:geo2, x=T, y=T) Error in if (!length(fname) || !any(fname == zname)) { : missing value where TRUE/FALSE needed The

I am interested in a model diagnostic for logistic regression which is normally distributed (much like the residuals in linear regression with are ~ N(0,variance unknown). My understanding is that most (all?) of the residuals returned by residuals.lrm {design} either don't have a well defined distribution or are distributed as Chi-Square. Have I overlooked a residual measure or would it be