similar to: Overloading %*%

Hi, I need some help to get some of the object orientation, specifically the methods that overload the basic arithmetic operations, from sample C++ code to R. I don't have experience with such advanced language features inside of R. So I was wondering if some of you could help me out in this regard. I have written a simple demonstration of a forward mode automatic differentiator in C++ and

Hi, I need some help to get some of the object orientation, specifically the methods that overload the basic arithmetic operations, from sample C++ code to R. I don't have experience with such advanced language features inside of R. So I was wondering if some of you could help me out in this regard. I have written a simple demonstration of a forward mode automatic differentiator in C++ and

Hi! I was just wondering is there anyway to overload operator for custom class. For example: I have two matrices A and B with same dimensions. I want to overload operator '+' with my own function. Or even better can I create my own (new) operator. Example: A+-B where '+-' would be some function. bye, Tine

(1) It seems to me that, generally, in R it is not possible to overload functions. Is that right? (2) Assuming that the above is true, or partially true, is there any extra packages to handle overloading in R? (3) Assuming (1) is TRUE and (2) is FALSE, can anyone provide some advice on developing some function that understand what the arguments are and then calls the right overloaded

I have been trying to write a new class that reimplements the vector class. As a test of my overloading I decided to try and and call t.test on two vectors which were objects of my class rather than the default class. The overloaded length I wrote seems to work correctly. I used setMethod("length", "myvector", ...) setMethod("mean", "myvector", ...)

Dear all, I am experiencing some problems with S4 method overloading. I have defined a generic for graphics:plot, using setGeneric("plot", useAsDefault = plot) and with importFrom('graphics', 'plot') and exportMethods('plot') in the NAMESPACE file of pkg A. I then proceed to define a method for signature c('myS4class', 'missing'). This works

Ein eingebundener Text mit undefiniertem Zeichensatz wurde abgetrennt. Name: nicht verf?gbar URL: <https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/r-help/attachments/20101028/d7e0cc89/attachment.pl>

Dear R gurus, I am trying to overload some operators in order to let these work with the ff package by registering the S3 objects from the ff package and overloading the operators as shown below in a reproducible example where the "*" operator is overloaded. require(ff) setOldClass(Classes=c("ff_vector")) setMethod( f="*", signature = signature(e1 =

Hi David, The error shows that the clang source code uses this intrinsic as well, but in the old form. You need to modify the clang source code (where this intrinsic is used) to consider the overloaded operands. The assert would show the trace where clang uses this intrinsic. Hope this helps, Anna > On Jul 26, 2016, at 3:21 PM, David Noursi via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org>

Hello All, I have been modifying LLVM a project of mine, and have encountered issues with overloading an intrinsic function. I have defined two types, abit (which is mapped, in Intrinsics.td, to i128) and qbit (accordingly mapped to i16). I would like my intrinsic function, CNOT(x,y), to accept either an abit or a qbit for each argument, so I overload with iAny and llvm_anyint_ty, as seemed to

How can I overload the "[" and "[<-" operators using S3 classes? Something like '['.{class} did not work or at least I do not know how to define it properly. For S4 it is straightforward: setMethod("[", signature(x = "myClass", i = "numeric"), function (x, i, j, ..., drop){ ... some operations }) How to do the same for S3? TIA!

Hi, Structures are passed by pointer, so the return value is not actually in eax. That code gets transformed into something like: void sum(A1 *out, const A1 one, const A1 two) { out->x = one.x + two.x out->y = one.y + two.y } So actually the function ends up returning void and operating on a hidden parameter, so %eax is dead at the end of the function and should not be being relied

Problem seems not only with operator overloading, It occurs with struct value returning also. gdb while debugging expects the return value in eax, gcc does returns in eax, But Clang returns in edx(it can be checked in gdb by printing the contents of edx). Code(sample code) struct A1 { int x; int y; }; A1 sum(const A1 one, const A1 two) { A1 plus = {0,0}; plus.x = one.x + two.x; plus.y

Hi, As you told that function ends up returning void, I just confirmed it in the IR, the function is defined as: define *void* @_Z3sum2A1S_(*%struct.A1* noalias sret %agg.result*, %struct.A1* byval align 4 %one, %struct.A1* byval align 4 %two). But when i checked the register values in g++, eax contains an address of stack, which points to the value (object) returned by sum. That is if we

Hello, I did send this message to r-help and got no reply, no I am resubmitting here in case this was a bit too specific for the other list. Many thanks, Iago From: Iago Mosqueira <imosqueira@suk.azti.es> To: r-help@stat.math.ethz.ch Subject: Subsetting using dimnames on S4 array-based class

Hello,   I would like to overload the "+" operator so that it can be used to concatenate two strings, e.g "John" + "Doe" = "JohnDoe". How can I 'unseal' the "+" method? > setMethod("+", signature(e1="character", e2="character"), function(e1, e2) paste(e1, e2, sep="") ) Error in

Dear all, what is the proper way to make the assignment operator generic and define methods depending on the class of the assigned value? Best regards Jens Oehlschl?gel P.S. I vaguely remember that this was possible in S+. In R I tried to no avail: # using this like h<-1:3 gives Error: in `<-.default`(h, 1:3) : invalid (do_set) left-hand side to assignment

Hello, I do some computations on datasets that come from climate models. These data are huge arrays, significantly larger than typically available RAM, so they have to be accessed row-by-row, or rather slice-by slice, depending on the task. I would like to make an R package to easily access such datasets within R. The C++ backend is ready and being used under Windows/.Net/Visual Basic, but I have

For the given test: class A1 { int x; int y; public: A1(int a, int b) { x=a; y=b; } A1 operator+(const A1&); }; A1 A1::operator+(const A1& second) { A1 sum(0,0); sum.x = x + second.x; sum.y = y + second.y; return (sum); } int main (void) { A1 one(2,3); A1 two(4,5); return 0; } when the exectable of this code is debugged in gdb for i386, we dont get the

Inspired by Rudolf Biczok's query of Fri, Jan 23, 2009 at 1:25 AM, I tried to implement iteration in a generic way using S4. (Though I am admittedly still struggling with learning S4.) > setClass("foo",representation(bar="list")) [1] "foo" > x<-new("foo",bar=list(1,2,3)) Given this, I would not expect for(i in x)... to work, since R has no way