similar to: strange results from binomial lmer?

Hi, Nikita pointed me to an issue in the full restrict patches, related to name mangling used for llvm-ir functions (See [0, 3]). The problem is the following: Given: %0 = type { i32 } %1 = type { i32 } Creating an intrinsic @llvm.FOO that accepts 'a pointer to %0' cannot be distinguished from the intrinsic accepting 'a pointer to %1': ;For a %0* ptr0, %1* ptr1

I am fitting models to the responses to a questionnaire that has seven yes/no questions (Item). For each combination of Subject and Item, the variable Response is coded as 0 or 1. I want to include random effects for both Subject and Item. While I understand that the datasets are fairly small, and there are a lot of invariant subjects, I do not understand something that is happening here, and in

I am fitting models to the responses to a questionnaire that has seven yes/no questions (Item). For each combination of Subject and Item, the variable Response is coded as 0 or 1. I want to include random effects for both Subject and Item. While I understand that the datasets are fairly small, and there are a lot of invariant subjects, I do not understand something that is happening

I am running lrm() with a single factor. I then run anova() on the fitted model to obtain a p-value associated with having that factor in the model. I am noticing that the "Model L.R." in the lrm results is almost the same as the "Chi-Square" in the anova results, but not quite; the latter value is always slightly smaller. anova() calculates the p-value based on

Hello, Another French student in the rsync mailing list. I have been working on rsync this year for a documentation project for school and I would like to give some comment about rsync block size optimization first, and then to submit a way to make rsync choose by itself the optimal blocksize when updating a large number of files. Well, the first comment: during my work, I wanted to verify

I looked for examples of count data that might interest the students and found this project about dropout rates in Los Angeles High Schools. It is discussed in the UCLA stats help pages for the Stata users: http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/library/count.htm and See: http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/library/longutil.htm To replicate those results, I used R's excellent foreign package to

I am encountering an error I do not know how to debug. The error arises when I try to add an interaction term involving two continuous variables (defined using rcs functions) to an existing (and working) model. The new model reads: model5 <- lrm( B_fainting ~ gender+ rcs(exactage, 7) + rcs(DW_nadler_bv, 7) + rcs(drawtimefrom8am, 7)+ DW_firsttime+ DW_race_eth +

I am looking at data of the following structure: n <- 100 dataset <- data.frame(gender=NULL,subject=NULL,outcome=NULL) for (i in 1:n){ gender <- c(rep("m",5),rep("f",5)) subject <- letters[1:10] outcome <- c(rbinom(5,1,0.6),rbinom(5,1,0.4)) dataset <- rbind(dataset,cbind(gender,subject,outcome))} I am interested in the significance of

I have a large dataset where each Subject answered seven similar Items, which are binary yes/no questions. So I've always used Subject and Item random effects in my models, fit with lmer(), e.g.: model<-lmer(Response~Race+Gender+...+(1|Subject_ID)+(1| Item_ID),data,binomial) But I recently realized something. Most of the variables that I've tested as fixed effects are properties

Dear R people, I am having a problem with modeling the following SAS code in R: Class ID Gr Hemi Region Gender Model Y = Gr Region Hemi Gender Gr*Hemi Gr*Region Hemi*Region Gender*Region Gender*Hemi Gr*Hemi*Region Gender*Hemi*Region Gr*Gender*Hemi*Region Random Intercept Region Hemi /Subject = ID (Gr Gender) I.e., ID is a random effect nested in Gr and Gender, leading to ID-specific

Am 13.07.2016 um 12:09 schrieb Reindl Harald: > > > Am 12.07.2016 um 23:58 schrieb Achim Gottinger: >> With >> >> Type=notify >> NotifyAccess=all >> >> systemctl status samba-ad-dc >> ● samba-ad-dc.service - Samba AD Daemon >> Loaded: loaded (/lib/systemd/system/samba-ad-dc.service; enabled) >> Active: active (running) since Tue

> Am 29.05.2018 um 11:00 schrieb Aki Tuomi <aki.tuomi at dovecot.fi>: > > > > On 29.05.2018 11:35, Hajo Locke wrote: >> Hello, >> >> >> Am 29.05.2018 um 09:22 schrieb Aki Tuomi: >>> >>> On 29.05.2018 09:54, Hajo Locke wrote: >>>> Hello List, >>>> >>>> i use dovecot 2.2.22 and have the same

I wonder if someone can tell me what these ''unknown'' remarks mean in my status file. They are only in the last portion of the file and are listed below. If they mean nothing, I will rest easy. But if not it means I need to fix something. Your thoughts would be appreciated. ---------------- udp 17 92 src=24.224.173.220 dst=24.222.0.75 sport=1027 dport=53 src=24.222.0.75

I am running samba 4.1.7, and also upgraded to 4.1.8. I'm following the wiki to add a second domain controller. Everything works fine until I get to the part about the DNS entries for the new host and using ldbsearch. I am using Arch Linux and their Samba package. Here is the error: # ldbsearch --modules-path=/usr/lib/samba/ldb/ -H /var/lib/samba/private/sam.ldb '(invocationid=*)'

I have a problem init''ing log4r. I have the following initialization code for log4r: Configurator[''logpath''] = ''./config'' # was ''./logs'' Configurator.load_xml_file(''config/log4r_config.xml'') I put it in appliction.rb, but then ofcourse at every request the logger system will be reinitialized. This causes the

Hi Irucka, No problem. I guess this could be done using: Sample data: Dailydo<- structure(list(Date = structure(c(11231, 11232, 11233, 11234, 11235, 11236, 11207, 11208, 11209, 11179, 11180, 11181, 11151, 11152, 11123, 11093, 11064, 11065, 11035, 11036, 11008, 11009, 10979, 10980, 11347, 11348, 11380, 11381, 11410, 11406, 11438, 11439, 11470, 11502, 11528, 11560, 11561, 11593, 11594,

Under some circumstances for debugging purposes it may be helfpfull to know the PID used during startup as well. Just noted that this one is only listen in forked mode. Samba does fork with type=notify as well but systemd is waiting for sd_notify message in that mode. Anyway, for curiosity i recompiled samba with --without-systemd. If i use type=notify mode now and no PIDFile, systemctl start

Hi, all, I "found" a big bug either related with Linux Ext3 file system or "bin/ls" command. The problem is: File system is no more than 220GB, but "/bin/ls" reports holding >370GB data! The system is Redhat 8.0, with a Generic Kernel 2.4.20. Any suggestions are greately appreciated. more information can be available upon requests. The following is the

Hello, Am 29.05.2018 um 11:30 schrieb Gerald Galster: > >> Am 29.05.2018 um 11:00 schrieb Aki Tuomi <aki.tuomi at dovecot.fi>: >> >> >> >> On 29.05.2018 11:35, Hajo Locke wrote: >>> Hello, >>> >>> >>> Am 29.05.2018 um 09:22 schrieb Aki Tuomi: >>>> On 29.05.2018 09:54, Hajo Locke wrote: >>>>>

This is release 0.9.58 of Wine, a free implementation of Windows on Unix. What's new in this release (see below for details): - The default version is now Windows XP. - Many Richedit improvements. - Beginning of jscript dll support. - Shell folders now respect XDG directory configuration. - Many translation updates. - Lots of bug fixes. Because of lags created by using mirrors,