similar to: survival curve for only certain values of a factor

Hi! I came across R just a few days ago since I was looking for a toolbox for cox-regression. I?ve read "Cox Proportional-Hazards Regression for Survival Data Appendix to An R and S-PLUS Companion to Applied Regression" from John Fox. As described therein plotting survival-functions works well (plot(survfit(model))). But I?d like to do some manipulation with the survival-functions

Hi there: i got a problem to get the prediction from a model recently. for example if i use a survival analysis to predict the risk. i use the code like below: i found the the prediction is not equal to (coef * x + coef * sex) , could someone help me with why this happened? and can someone explain to me how this command "predict(f, type="terms")" works? is every partial

Hello friends and fellow R users, I have successfully tabulated and entered my survival data into R and have generated survival curves. But I would like to be able to determine what the survival rates are now at one month, three months, six months and one year. I have a data set, via.wall, which I have entered into R, and which generates the following Surv object: Surv(Days,Status==1) [1]

Um texto embutido e sem conjunto de caracteres especificado associado... Nome: n?o dispon?vel Url: https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/r-help/attachments/20060711/1da40382/attachment.pl

Hi, I am new to time-dependent Cox model to estimate time dependent hazard ratios. Let me use aml dataset from survival package: > aml3<-survSplit(aml2,cut=c(5,10,20),end="time",start="start", event="status",episode="i") If I want to esimate hazard ratio for each of the time intervals 0-5, 5-10, 10-20 and >=20, would the following calculate

I am using plot(survfit(Surv(time,status) ~...) and would like to add error bars rather than the confidence intervals. Am I able to do this at specified times? e.g. when time = 20 & 40. leukemia.surv <- survfit(Surv(time, status) ~ x, data = aml) plot(leukemia.surv, lty = 2:3,xlim = c(0,50)) #can i add error bars at times 20 & 40? legend(100, .9, c("Maintenance", "No

Hi there, I have a question about one command sentence when I follow the example in the book of "Survival analysis in S": > aml1<-aml[aml$group==1] but I got the error warning: NULL data frame with 23 rows Thus, I couldn't keep going on the next command: esf.fit<-survfit(Surv(aml1,status)~1). and also when I try > aml1<-aml[aml$group==1,]

On Thu, Nov 21, 2019 at 12:03 PM Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael at kernel.org> wrote: > > On Thu, Nov 21, 2019 at 11:14 AM Mika Westerberg > <mika.westerberg at intel.com> wrote: > > > > On Wed, Nov 20, 2019 at 10:36:31PM +0100, Karol Herbst wrote: > > > with the branch and patch applied: > > >

On Thu, Nov 21, 2019 at 12:03:52PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Thu, Nov 21, 2019 at 11:14 AM Mika Westerberg > <mika.westerberg at intel.com> wrote: > > > > On Wed, Nov 20, 2019 at 10:36:31PM +0100, Karol Herbst wrote: > > > with the branch and patch applied: > > >

Hello all. I've been attempting to utilize the "survival" pkg ( http://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/survival/index.html), while reading through this guide (http://www.ms.uky.edu/~mai/Rsurv.pdf). I figured working through the guide would be the best way to go, before attempting my own data. I tried to utilize the Kaplain-Meier estimator as shown in the guide:

On Fri, Nov 22, 2019 at 12:30 PM Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael at kernel.org> wrote: > > On Fri, Nov 22, 2019 at 11:36 AM Mika Westerberg > <mika.westerberg at intel.com> wrote: > > > > On Thu, Nov 21, 2019 at 11:39:23PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > > On Thu, Nov 21, 2019 at 8:49 PM Mika Westerberg > > > <mika.westerberg at intel.com>

On Wed, Nov 20, 2019 at 1:06 PM Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael at kernel.org> wrote: > > On Wed, Nov 20, 2019 at 12:51 PM Karol Herbst <kherbst at redhat.com> wrote: > > > > On Wed, Nov 20, 2019 at 12:48 PM Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael at kernel.org> wrote: > > > > > > On Wed, Nov 20, 2019 at 12:22 PM Mika Westerberg > > > <mika.westerberg

On Thu, Nov 21, 2019 at 01:46:14PM +0200, Mika Westerberg wrote: > On Thu, Nov 21, 2019 at 12:34:22PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > On Thu, Nov 21, 2019 at 12:28 PM Mika Westerberg > > <mika.westerberg at intel.com> wrote: > > > > > > On Wed, Nov 20, 2019 at 11:29:33PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > > > > last week or so I found

On Thu, Nov 21, 2019 at 1:53 PM Karol Herbst <kherbst at redhat.com> wrote: > > On Thu, Nov 21, 2019 at 12:46 PM Mika Westerberg > <mika.westerberg at intel.com> wrote: > > > > On Thu, Nov 21, 2019 at 12:34:22PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > > On Thu, Nov 21, 2019 at 12:28 PM Mika Westerberg > > > <mika.westerberg at intel.com> wrote:

On Wed, Nov 20, 2019 at 11:29:33PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > last week or so I found systems where the GPU was under the "PCI > > Express Root Port" (name from lspci) and on those systems all of that > > seems to work. So I am wondering if it's indeed just the 0x1901 one, > > which also explains Mikas case that Thunderbolt stuff works as devices >

On Thu, Nov 21, 2019 at 11:39 PM Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael at kernel.org> wrote: > > On Thu, Nov 21, 2019 at 8:49 PM Mika Westerberg > <mika.westerberg at intel.com> wrote: > > > > On Thu, Nov 21, 2019 at 04:43:24PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > > On Thu, Nov 21, 2019 at 1:52 PM Mika Westerberg > > > <mika.westerberg at intel.com>

On Wed, Nov 20, 2019 at 12:48 PM Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael at kernel.org> wrote: > > On Wed, Nov 20, 2019 at 12:22 PM Mika Westerberg > <mika.westerberg at intel.com> wrote: > > > > On Wed, Nov 20, 2019 at 11:52:22AM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > > On Wed, Nov 20, 2019 at 11:18 AM Mika Westerberg > > > <mika.westerberg at intel.com>

On Thu, Nov 21, 2019 at 04:43:24PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Thu, Nov 21, 2019 at 1:52 PM Mika Westerberg > <mika.westerberg at intel.com> wrote: > > > > On Thu, Nov 21, 2019 at 01:46:14PM +0200, Mika Westerberg wrote: > > > On Thu, Nov 21, 2019 at 12:34:22PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > > > On Thu, Nov 21, 2019 at 12:28 PM Mika

On Thu, Nov 21, 2019 at 12:34:22PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Thu, Nov 21, 2019 at 12:28 PM Mika Westerberg > <mika.westerberg at intel.com> wrote: > > > > On Wed, Nov 20, 2019 at 11:29:33PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > > > last week or so I found systems where the GPU was under the "PCI > > > > Express Root Port" (name

Hi List, A friend of mine recently asked the same question as Heinz T?chler. Since I've already written the code I'd like to share with the list. # x is an object returned by "survfit"; # "smed" returns a matrix of 5 columns of # n, events, median, 0.95LCL, 0.95UCL. # The matrix returned has rownames as the # group labels (eg., treatment arms) if any. smed <-