similar to: Sample code for interfacing with F90

G?ran, thanks. Happy easter! -----Original Message----- From: G?ran Brostr?m [mailto:gb at stat.umu.se] Sent: ned 2005-03-27 07:38 To: Gorjanc Gregor Cc: r-help at stat.math.ethz.ch Subject: Re: [Rd] F90 On Sun, Mar 27, 2005 at 03:26:39AM +0200, Gorjanc Gregor wrote: > Hello! > > Has anyone successfully compiled F90 sources in R-package? I found the > same question on r-devel list

I am reading the manual sections illustrating how to call a Fortran subroutine from R. I feel uneasy at the explicit statement about ".Fortran" interface working with Fortran 77. I would like to call a Fortran-90 subroutine from my R script. Is that supported at all ? Thank you, Maura tutti i telefonini TIM! [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

I browsed through ch.5 of R manual "Writing R extensions". It seems to be written for experienced programmers rathern than for people who occasionally face this problem. A table summarising the main ley points for each supported platform would be very useful. Something like: Supported languages: C, Fortran-77, ...... Windows guidelines: 1. compie Fotran code with (commands) from

Hello! Has anyone successfully compiled F90 sources in R-package? I found the same question on r-devel list from 2002 and I wonder if there is any progress. I heard that g95 and gfortran can be usable. And one more thing. I have a program written in F90 and lets suppose that compiler is not a problem. I've read manual 'Writing R Extensions' and successfully loaded one F77 subroutine

Hello! Has anyone successfully compiled F90 sources in R-package? I found the same question on r-devel list from 2002 and I wonder if there is any progress. I heard that g95 and gfortran can be usable. And one more thing. I have a program written in F90 and lets suppose that compiler is not a problem. I've read manual 'Writing R Extensions' and successfully loaded one F77 subroutine

Hi, did anybody manage to compile F90 sources in an R-package? The major problem is, at least in my opinion, that non of the "free" F90 -> F77 converters is working correctly, at least for the F90 sources I need to compile. Torsten -.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.- r-devel mailing list -- Read

I have tried to compile the working Fortran-90 routines (see attachment) to interface them with R. The compiler automatically caled by R CMD command line prints a bunch of error messages (as follows). I think I'm better off translating the Fortran implementation into R ... which is what I hoped I could avoid. Maura host705:Desktop mauede$ R CMD SHLIB ford.f90 gfortran -arch i386

I recently submitted a package to CRAN which encompasses Fortran 90 code. Neither on my linux system nor on the win-builder system the compilation reported any error or warning. The function worked fine. However, after submission of the package to CRAN, I received an email that I should not include Fortran 90 code. The problem is that the part written in Fortran is a large function using

I too have some messy F77 code that I'm considering porting to F90. BUT: Has anyone had luck creating shared-objects from F90 to load in R? What about submitting packages to CRAN with F90 code? BTW: I'm using the Intel compilers for Linux - free for Not-for-profit orgs. -R -.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.- r-help mailing list -- Read

Hi again, Is there any documenation on interfacing R with Fortran 90/95? Or a small example...? I'm mostly interested in passing matrices as dummy arrays in Fortran 95. For example, I would like to be able to call from R a routine having a declaration such as subroutine F(x,....) double, dimension(:,:), intent(inout) :: x ..... end subroutine F Does somebody have any experience in

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 I'm trying to add some Fortran 90 code to an existing package. When I compile and load the file manually like: SHELL> R CMD SHLIB file.f90 R> dyn.load("file.so") I can use the .Fortran() fine. However, when I try to build, install and load the library I seem to be missing something. I do a: SHELL> R CMD build dir SHELL> R

Hi, is there any chance to install glmnet with gcc-4.5.2? For me it fails on all systems with: trying URL 'http://mirrors.softliste.de/cran/src/contrib/glmnet_1.7.tar.gz' Content type 'application/x-gzip' length 522888 bytes (510 Kb) opened URL ================================================== downloaded 510 Kb * installing *source* package ?glmnet? ... This package has only

Jeff Brown wrote: > > Hi, > > I'm trying to learn to use .C, which lets one invoke compiled C code from > within R. To do that, one has to first get the C code into R as a shared > object, which (I think) means first compiling it (with COMPILE or SHLIB) > and then loading it (with dyn.load()). > I would suggest taking it a step further and building an R package

Hello, I work under windows xp and I am trying to build a R package with a subroutine written in fortran 90. I have installed all the updated tools and I am working with R-2.4.0 or R-2.5.0. When I check a package with a subroutine in fortran 77 (and extension f) everything is ok. When I try to build the same package with a subroutine in fortran 90 (with extension f90) the following warning

We have (spatial statistics) group here that are (about to) interface Fortran 90 and/or 95 software to R and/or S-plus. My recommendation has been against this because of non-availability of GNU or other free (not only moneywise, in the GNU sense) compilers for Fortran 9x. Does anybody have good guesses about the future here? The user group here say they like F 9[05] because of its ``object

Hi everyone! I'm trying to lear how to call external C code in R but even the R help web-page example is drive me crazy. I copy-paste the example at: http://stat.ethz.ch/R-manual/R-patched/doc/manual/R-exts.html#Interface%20functions%20.C%20and%20.Fortran here is the example: void convolve(double *a, int *na, double *b, int *nb, double *ab) { int i, j, nab = *na + *nb - 1; for(i = 0;

Dear all, I have an image that I need to filter, and so I'm looking for a method to convolve it with a matrix. If I understood the docs for convolve correctly, it only works in 1D (and I have tried to convolve, it didn't look good). So, I wondered if anybody have implemented 2D convolution in R, or have any good advices to share (beyond having a look at mvfft), before I go hacking?

Dear all, I am currently trying to create a package wrapping Fortran90 code, the RRTMG radiative transfer model( http://rtweb.aer.com/rrtm_frame.html). I am doing this on a Linux workstation, with gcc/gfortran, in case this matters. The code heavily relies on F90 features, in particular modules, which seem to clash with R's assumptions for calling compiled code. What I have done: -compiled

Hi, I am happy to announce that I finished the translation of almost all LGPL'ed R headerfiles to Delphi. As a test I did several demos which basically contain delphized versions of all the examples of chapter 5 in "Writing R Extensions". Please have a look in the attachments for details (DemosAndHeaders.txt), more information (Readme.txt) and an example of how it looks

Good Afternoon R Help! On of my users is seriously thinking about moving to R from Splus. In his testing, he has already found some benefits to it. He has, however run into one issue, calling his Fortran functions in R. Previously, in Splus, he would do the following: 1. Compile via f90 the *.f program 2. link the object file to the Fortran IMSL libraries via the 'ld' command 3.