similar to: R det

I just detected, that det() is not working on complex matrices any more, due to the fix to the bug reports noted above. I am not happy with this, as determinants are perfectly usable on complex matrices. AFAIUI the bugs resulted from less than optimal behaviour of qr() in certain cases. IMHO this is due to the unhappy decision to use a default for parameter tol to decide whether the the

Hello, Currently, determinant(A) calculates the determinant of 'A' by factorizing A=LU and computing prod(diag(U)) [or the logarithm of the absolute value]. The factorization is done by LAPACK routine DGETRF, which gives a status code INFO, documented [1] as follows: *> INFO is INTEGER *> = 0: successful exit *> < 0: if INFO = -i, the i-th

I just set up our Samba-Server to athenticate over Active Directory (Win 2003). But there is one thing that bothers me: There are no home-directories for the domain users, that waere added to the linux passwd database (EXAMPLE.COM+user1 can be authenticated, but has no home on the Linux-box). If I create a share home, nobody can open it, because it cannot be found. Only if I set the path option,

A brandly new E400P 128 channel PRI, you can find more information on the Digium's site. The card was not used before, I sell it cause our company just don't need, we use Cisco AS5300. I can offer you the PCI PRI at $940 if bought in the next 2 days, I can send it to you via FedEx or DHL express. Please email me for more details! Regards, Kalin ----------------------------- IPPN Networks

Full_Name: Armin Roehrl Version: 1.4.0(2001-12-19) OS: Linux; Suse 7.3 Submission from: (NULL) (217.84.18.204) Hello, On a given matrix det returns different results whether I use the method "qr" or "eivenvalues". The matrix: > m2 [,1] [,2] [,3] [1,] 9.822616e+09 3.841723e+09 79790.09 [2,] 3.841723e+09 1.502536e+09 31251.82 [3,]

r-devel list, I have recently written an R package that solves a linear least squares problem, and computes the multivariate normal density function. The bulk of the code is written in C, with interfacing code to the BLAS and Lapack libraries. The motivation here is speed. I ran into a problem computing the determinant of a symmetric matrix in packed storage. Apparently, there are no explicit

Hello, I am trying to write an R package for doing analysis of speaker recognition systems. The big thing in this line of research is a DET-plot (detection Error Trade-off, a ROC plot with qnorm() warped axes). My approach has been to make a class "det" and also a function "det()" that will prepare the data into the right class. Now loading the library doesn't like me

Hello, When I use det() and qr() on complex matrices the result is in some cases indeterministic. The documentation speaks of numeric matrices (and not of complex matrices) but det() uses qr() which should handle complex matrices correctly. I've also tried using only qr() with similar results. det() returns a value that is not the determinant of the complex matrix (in accordance with

Dear R users, even if this question is not related to an issue about R, probably some of you will be able to help me. I have a square matrix of dimension k by k with alpha on the diagonal and beta everywhee else. This symmetric matrix is called symmetric compound matrix and has the form a( I + cJ), where I is the k by k identity matrix J is the k by k matrix of all ones a = alpha - beta c =

Hi all, For some time I noticed that my rsync server is not showing a colorfull MOTD... Researching a bit, it turns out to be a problem since rsync-2.6.7 (rsync-2.6.6 is OK). Looking at the NEWS: - The way rsync escapes unreadable characters has changed. First, rsync now has support for recognizing valid multibyte character sequences in your current locale, allowing it to

Hi uRsers, when inverting a 2 by 2 matrix using solve, I encountered a error message: solve.default(sigma, tol = 1e-07) : system is computationally singular: reciprocal condition number = 1.7671e-017 and then I test the determinant of this matrix: 6.341393e-06. In my program, I have a condition block that whether a matrix is invertible like this: if(det(sigma)<1e-7) return NULL;

Full_Name: Krzysztof Podgorski Version: R version 2.4.1 (2006-12-18) OS: Windows XP Submission from: (NULL) (130.235.3.79) The function ''det'' works improperly for a singular matrix and returns a non-zero value even if ''solve'' reports singularity. The matrix is very simple as shown below. A <- diag(rep(c(64,8), c(8,8))) A[9:16,1] <- 8 A[1,9:16] <- 8

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=623 Summary: ssh, ssh-keygen and possibly others do not honour $HOME Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 3.6.1p2 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: ssh AssignedTo: openssh-bugs at mindrot.org

Dear R-help list, Pls I have this problem. Suppose I have a matrix of size nxn say, generated as follows   z<-matrix(rnorm(n*n,0,1),nrow=n)   I want to write a function such that for i in 1:n, I will remove the rows and columns corresponding to i (so, will be left with n-1*n-1 submatrix in each cases). Now I need the sum of the determinant of each of this submatrices. As an example, if n=3, it

Greetings; I've posted the following to R's bug tracking system (at https://bugs.r-project.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17210 ) and Martin Maechler requested that I post to this list as well. If I start R from the command line with --vanilla, then repeatedly execute the following line: det(matrix(nrow=10,ncol=10)) ... I eventually get a crash, with error: *** Error in

Dear R, If I have remembered correctly, a square matrix is singular if and only if its determinant is zero. I am a bit confused by the following code error. Can someone give me a hint? > a <- matrix(c(1e20,1e2,1e3,1e3),2) > det(a) [1] 1e+23 > solve(a) Error in solve.default(a) : system is computationally singular: reciprocal condition number = 1e-17 Thanks in advance! Feng --

On April 15th, Elizabeth wrote: <snip> > In execises 39-42, determine if the columns of the matrix span > R4: <snip> >(or x <- matrix(data=c(7, -5, 6, -7, 2, -3, 10, 9, -5, > 4, -2, 2, 8, -9, 7, 15), nrow=4, ncol=4) > >That is the whole of the question <snip> Have you tried det(x) and/or eigen(x) ? A zero determinant (within

[Hope this is the right list where to send...] An attempt to update package 'mnormt' involves the addition of a small new function called 'pd.solve'. When I come to the package checking stage, an error occurs in parsing pd.solve.Rd. The full transcript of the outcome is copied below (it includes details on my installation) but the critical point is where the \examples{} section

Hello, Regarding this in R-devel/NEWS/New features : o ?library(pkg)? no longer warns about a conflict with a function from ?package:base? if the function is an identical copy of the base one but with a different environment. Why would one want an identical copy in a different environment? I'm thinking I may be missing out on a trick here. Matthew

I have been running into difficulties with dispatching on an S4 class defined in the SparseM package, when the method calls are inside a function passed as the f= argument to optimize() in functions in the spdep package. The S4 methods are typically defined as: setMethod("det","matrix.csr", function(x, ...) det(chol(x))^2) that is within setMethod() rather than by name before