similar to: PVM error message

Hi All - I'm running a faily long script that uses rpvm & snowFT to spawn off multiple processes with the 'clusterApplyFT' function. Specifically, what happens is that the head node generates a number of seed clusters that are then spawned off to the pvm cluster (in this case, nodes on a 4 dual-core machine) using clusterApplyFT to apply a function to each seed cluster that

Hey my R buddies, I installed the "snow" and "rpvm" package on my Lenovo Thinkpad T400 today. The experiment below gave me a surprise. The time consumed by serial processing was several times larger than that taken by parallel processing. I'm very curious how this happened. Thank you very much. > library(snow) > > cc <- makePVMcluster(2) > > temp <-

I tried ot build rpvm in my own makefile. But runs into some linker errors like e.g. undefined reference to `_R_alloc' My enviornment looks like this: CYGWIN pvm 3.4 compiled under cygwin myself R installed from the rw2001.exe setup file. I guess that the R under rw2001.exe was build with some other compiler? I then tried to compile R myself under CYGWIN but runs into the following

Dear Friends, I'm trying to learn to use parallel computation using snow & rpvm Now, I have two boxes: 1) Pentium 4, pvm 3.4.5, R 2.2.0 with FreeBSD 5.4 (box uffbsd); 2) PowerPC, pvm 3.4.5, R 2.1.1 with Debian Linux latest stable (box powerpclinux); I'm using the instructions in (found in snow.pdf) http://www.stat.uiowa. edu/~luke/R/cluster/cluster.html. Now ** from the box

I've trying to fix the check error in rpvm package. Right now on my Mac, I use darwinport to install PVM and I can get rpvm to pass the check using 'R -arch x86_64 CMD check'. However the default 'R CMD check' uses i386 which fails since PVM is built for x86_64 only. So is there a way to ensure proper architecture is used that matches that of the external library like PVM?

I am trying to install the rpvm package doing this: C:\R\rw2000\bin>rcmd install rpvm_0.6-2.tar.gz '.' is not recognized as an internal or external command, operable program or batch file. '.' is not recognized as an internal or external command, operable program or batch file. make: *** /rpvm: No such file or directory. Stop. make: *** [pkg-rpvm] Error 2 *** Installation of

Hi all, I'm trying to get the snow package with mpi working on my linux ubuntu 10.04 machine. When I tried to install it (see below) it already had problems with the dependencies. R version 2.14.0 (2011-10-31) Copyright (C) 2011 The R Foundation for Statistical Computing ISBN 3-900051-07-0 Platform: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu (64-bit) R is free software and comes with ABSOLUTELY NO WARRANTY. You

Hi, does anybody know how to use the dual processors in the machines of a cluster? I am using R with rpvm and snow packages. I usually start pvm daemon and add host machines first, and then run R to start my computing work. But I find that only one processor in each machine is used in this way and the other one always stays idle. Is there any simple way to tell pvm to use the two processors at

I see about 7 different R packages for multi-process parallel programming. Which do you think is the best, most complete, and most robust to pick for general purpose Erlang-style message-passing programming in R, and why? First here's my use case, and then my analysis so far. I often have code whose basic organization looks something like this: 1. Fetch step: For each date, gather up or

Caveat: I've only played with this a couple of years ago... I believe you can just add each host _twice_ (or as many times as the number of CPUs at that host) to get both CPUs to work. Andy From: Paul Y. Peng > > Hi, > > does anybody know how to use the dual processors in the > machines of a cluster? I am using R with rpvm and snow > packages. I usually start pvm

Hello, I'm trying to install the rpvm package under Windows, but I am having problems. I have pvm3.4 installed properly. I've defined the system variables PVM_ROOT = C:\PROGRA~1\pvm3.4\ PVM_ARCH = win32 When I try to install, I get this: C:\R\Packages>Rcmd INSTALL rpvm_1.0.1.tar.gz ---------- Making package rpvm ------------ **********************************************

Dear R Users, Is there a version of rpvm available for windows ? I have recently had some problems with snow using SOCKS and was considering PVM as an alternative. Thanks in advance, Tolga Generally, this communication is for informational purposes only and it is not intended as an offer or solicitation for the purchase or sale of any financial instrument or as an official confirmation of

Dear R-devel, Inspired by Michael Li's talk at JSM, I decided to try rpvm and snow on our two linux boxes. It only took me a couple of hours of screwing around to get it working (sooner if I had RTFM). Our setup is: 2 dual PIII-866 Xeons, one with 2GB RDRAM, the other with 1.28GB RDRAM. The first machine is acting as the NIS/NFS server. both /usr and /home are exported to the second

At office, using the internal LAN at my disposal, I'm having a go at parallel computing - to begin with - with pvm, rpvm & snow. The two boxes are as follows Remote machine uffbsd: CPU: Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.00GHz (1994.13-MHz 686-class CPU) Origin = "GenuineIntel" Id = 0xf24 Stepping = 4 real memory = 260046848 (248 MB) This machine NbBSD: CPU: Mobile Intel(R)

Hi list, I recently installed the Trixbox distribution as an HVM and have now converted it to a PVM. Found very few resources on Internet where people had done this conversion so I had very little to compare with. Wanted to ask for comments about the kernel used in the PVM after the conversion. Installing Trixbox and later installing the xenified kernel, gives a kernel of 2.6.18-92..... In my

Thanks you all guys. I am able to create the RHEL5 PVM on RHEL5 host successfully. Only thing that i need to add is /mnt/etc/fstab in inintrd command and preload to both the fronthend drivers. As blow. # mount /home/disk /mnt # mkinirtd /boot//boot/initrd-2.6.18-8.el5xenU.img 2.6.18-8.el5xen --fstab /mnt/ etc/fstab --with xenblk --with xennet --preload xenblk --preload xennet Thanks a lot,

(My apologies if this is the wrong list or if this question has been asked before. I’ve done quite a bit of searching and can’t find an answer) I am working on a heavily modified version of CentOS with a user-land that mostly matches 5.4 and a kernel based on 6.2. I''ve found tutorials on how to create a CentOS PVM (such as http://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/Xen/InstallingCentOSDomU) but I

What is the best practice in creating PVm domU''s - with or without swap? >From the admin point of view, especially in HA environment it is temptating not to have a seperate swap partition. Could it be performance issue if swapping to swap-file insted of swap-partition? What about pure swapless- no swapfile, no swap-partition? Any expirence out there? regards Longina -- --

Hi, I tell you my problem: I've installed a Ubuntu's HVM guest in CentOS with XEN, then I convert my HVM to PVM based in this tutto : http://www.asplund.nu/xencluster/xen-convert-hvm-to-pvm.html After this modification everythings it runs fine but I have a problem with xconsole, I don't see anything when I run the command "xm console ID" , I only see the boot proccess and the

I am using xencenter to connect to my ubuntu 12.04 xen box If i create a PVM with a template, everything works great if i create a HVM with the custom template, the console does not respond to keyboard or mouse clicks? any ideas what could be the problem? _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@lists.xen.org http://lists.xen.org/xen-users