similar to: RWeka and naiveBayes

Le jeudi 09 f?vrier 2012 ? 15:31 +0200, Kari Ruohonen a ?crit : > Hi, > I am trying to replicate a training of AttributeSelectedClassifier with > CFsSubsetEval, BestFirst and NaiveBayes that I have initially done with > Weka. Now, I am trying to use RWeka in R. > > I have a problem of passing arguments to the CfsSubsetEval, BestFirst > and NaiveBayes. I have first created an

What I want to do is put the arguments I supply to a function into the title of a plot Say I'm calling func.1 func.1(a=4,b=4) plot(....,..., title("a=4, b=4")) If I'm calling func.1 with different arguments, I want the plot title to reflect that. A small detail is that func.1 might have an argument with a default like c=a+b. I tried using expression but couldn't get it to

Hi, I want to save a RWeka model into a file, in order to retrive it latter with a load function. See this example: library(RWeka) NB <- make_Weka_classifier("weka/classifiers/bayes/NaiveBayes") model<-NB(formula,data=data,...) # does not run but you get the idea save(model,file="model.dat") # simple save R command # ... load("model.dat") # load the model

Running Weka's command line with calls to system(), like this > system("java weka.classifiers.bayes.NaiveBayes -K -t HWlrTrain.arff -o") === Confusion Matrix === a b <-- classified as 3518 597 | a = NoSpray 644 926 | b = Spray === Stratified cross-validation === === Confusion Matrix === a b <-- classified as 3512 603 | a = NoSpray

Hi, I'm currently using the R package e1071 to train naive bayes classifiers and came across a bug: When the posterior probabilities of all classes are small, the result from the predict.naiveBayes function become NaNs. This is an issue with the treatment of the log-transformed probabilities inside the predict.naiveBayes function. Here is an example to demonstrate the problem (you might need

Hello, We have a system which creates thousands of regression/classification models and in cases where we have only one input variable NaiveBayes throws an error. Maybe I am mistaken and I shouldn't expect to have a model with only one input variable. We use R version 2.6.0 (2007-10-03). We use caret (v4.1.19), but have tested similar code with klaR (v.0.5.8), because caret relies on

I did this: nb <- naiveBayes(users, platform) pl <- predict(nb,users) nrow(users) ==> 314781 ncol(users) ==> 109 1. naiveBayes() was quite fast (~20 seconds), while predict() was slow (tens of minutes). why? 2. the predict results were completely off the mark (quite the opposite of the expected overfitting). suffice it to show the tables: pl: android blackberry ipad

I'm trying to fit a naive Bayes model and predict on a new data set using the functions naivebayes and predict (package = e1071). R version 2.5.1 on a Linux machine My data set looks like this. "class" is the response and k1 - k3 are the independent variables. All of them are factors. The response has 52 levels and k1 - k3 have 2-6 levels. I have about 9,300 independent variables

Hi, I have written a code in R for classifying microarray data using naive bayes, the code is given below: library(e1071) train<-read.table("Z:/Documents/train.txt",header=T); test<-read.table("Z:/Documents/test.txt",header=T); cl <- c(c(rep("ALL",10), rep("AML",10))); cl <- factor(cl) model <- NaiveBayes(train,cl);

Hey, I just like to know how to extract details from the naiveBayes model (package e1071). I mean, for each possible value the model defines how much it influences the outcome. I want to sort those probabilities and show the values with the highest impact. How could I do that? PS: I tried using []'s to get to the model's internals, however, all I get is a "list" not a

Hi, I run R 2.10.1 under ubuntu 10.04 LTS (Lucid Lynx) and klaR version 0.6-4. I compute a model over a 2 classes dataset (composed of 700 examples). To that aim, I use the function NaiveBayes provided in the package klaR. When I then use the prediction function : predict(my_model, new_data). I get the following warning : "In FUN(1:747[[747L]], ...) : Numerical 0 probability with

-----Original Message----- From: Patrick Connolly Sent: Friday, 9 November 2012 11:29 a.m. To: Peter Alspach Subject: Interfacing R and Weka > version _ platform x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu arch x86_64 os linux-gnu system x86_64, linux-gnu status major 2 minor 15.2 year 2012 month 10 day 26 svn rev

Hello all, I am attempting to run an R script that makes use of RWeka. I am running SuSE Linux 9.3 with Java 1.5.0_06, R version 2.2.1, Weka 3-4-7, and Rweka 0.2-1. CLASSPATH="/usr/local/weka-3-4-7/weka.jar:/usr/local/JGR/JGR.jar" I receive the error: NewObject("weka/core/Instances","(Ljava/io/Reader;)V",...) failed Exception in thread "main"

My data is 50,000 instances of about 200 predictor values, and for all 50,000 examples I have the actual class labels (binary). The data is quite unbalanced with about 10% or less of the examples having a positive outcome and the remainder, of course, negative. Nothing suggests the data has any order, and it doesn't appear to have any, so I've pulled the first 30,000 examples to use as

Dear all, I tried a simple naive Bayes classification on an artificial dataset, but I have troubles getting the predict function to work with the type="class" specification. With type= "raw", it works perfectly, but with type="class" I get following error : Error in as.vector(x, mode) : invalid 'mode' argument Data : mixture.train is a training set with 100

Hello, I have some trouble in achieving the desired parametrisation for the weka classifier functions, using the package RWeka. The problem is, that the functions result=classifier(formula, data, subset, na.action, control = Weka_control(mycontrol)) do not seem to be manipulated by the mycontrol- arguments Perhaps this should be resepected via the handlers- argument , but the

Dear List, I´m trying to implement the functionalities from WEKA into my modeling project in R through the RWeka package. In this context I have a slightly special question about the filters implemented in WEKA. I want to convert nominal attributes with k values into k binary attributes through the NominalToBinary filter ("weka.filters.supervised.attribute.NominalToBinary"). But

Hi everyone, I have trouble to use RWeka, I tried: (w=weather dataset, all preditors are nominal) > m<-J48(play~., data=w) > e<-evaluate_Weka_classifier(m,cost = matrix(c(0,2,1,0), + ncol = 2),numFolds = 10, complexity = TRUE,seed = 123, + class = TRUE) it gives me exactly what I want, but when I tried the same classifier on the other published data: (iris dataset has all numeric

Dear All, I am finding trouble trying to guild a Wrapper using random forest to evaluate the subsets: I do: nombi <- make_Weka_filter("weka/filters/supervised/attribute/AttributeSelection") datbin<- nombi(gene ~., data=X1X2X4X5W, control =Weka_control( S=list("weka.attributeSelection.GeneticSearch"), E=list("weka.attributeSelection.WrapperSubsetEval"),B

Hello, I have two questions concerning the RWeka package: 1.) First question: How can one perform a cross validation, -say 10fold- for a given data set and given model ? 2.) Second question What is the correct syntax for the parametrization of e.g. Kernel classifiers interface m1 <- SMO(Species ~ ., data = iris, control =