similar to: Difficulty Compiling RSQLite on Solaris x86 Using Studio 12 Compilers

All, I need to build samba 3.6.12 on solaris 8 using studio 12. Has anyone accomplished this and willing to share tips, tricks, or notes? -Kevin

Dear R-developers: I'm trying to build a 64-bit R-patched_2006-07-24 on SunFire V40z with on Solaris OS 10 64-bit kernel and using Sun Studio 11 compilers. Everything runs OK until it gets to building package tools (all.R) where it fails. Bellow is how I tried it (I can provide any other additional info if needed). Any help please? Thank you very much Latchezar Dimitrov Wake Forest Univ.

I am trying to compile R-2.4.1 in 64-bit on Solaris 10 running on AMD hardware. I am trying to do this with Sun Studio 11. My config.site looks like this: #! /bin/sh AR="/usr/ccs/bin/ar" TEX="/usr/local/teTeX/bin/i386-pc-solaris2.10/tex" LATEX="/usr/local/teTeX/bin/i386-pc-solaris2.10/latex" PDFTEX="/usr/local/teTeX/bin/i386-pc-solaris2.10/pdftex"

I am trying to compile R-2.4.1 in 64-bit on Solaris 10 running on AMD hardware. I am trying to do this with Sun Studio 11. My config.site looks like this: #! /bin/sh AR="/usr/ccs/bin/ar" TEX="/usr/local/teTeX/bin/i386-pc-solaris2.10/tex" LATEX="/usr/local/teTeX/bin/i386-pc-solaris2.10/latex" PDFTEX="/usr/local/teTeX/bin/i386-pc-solaris2.10/pdftex"

An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed... Name: config.txt Url: https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/r-help/attachments/20070501/bdf55878/attachment.txt

After building and bfu''in the lastest ON build, any time I run a dtrace script I get a Seg Fault. Is there a dtrace for dtrace :) Doug root at prae> dtrace -n ''syscall::open*:entry { printf("%s %s",execname,copyinstr(arg0)); }'' Segmentation Fault (core dumped) root at prae> pstack core core ''core'' of 101364: dtrace -n

I am trying to compile R on Linux using SunStudio. Configure flags are mostly as suggested in the R install guide. CC=/opt/sun/sunstudio12.1/bin/suncc CFLAGS="-g -xc99 -xlibmil -xlibmieee" MAIN_CFLAGS=-g SHLIB_CFLAGS=-g CPPFLAGS="-I. -I/opt/sun/sunstudio12.1/prod/include -I/opt/sun/sunstudio12.1/prod/include/cc" CPPFLAGS+="-I/opt/sun/sunstudio12.1/prod/include/cc/sys

I am trying to compile R-2.4.1 in 64-bit on Solaris 10 running on AMD hardware. I am trying to do this with Sun Studio 11. My config.site looks like this: #! /bin/sh AR="/usr/ccs/bin/ar" TEX="/usr/local/teTeX/bin/i386-pc-solaris2.10/tex" LATEX="/usr/local/teTeX/bin/i386-pc-solaris2.10/latex" PDFTEX="/usr/local/teTeX/bin/i386-pc-solaris2.10/pdftex"

I am trying to compile R-2.4.1 in 64-bit on Solaris 10 running on AMD hardware. I am trying to do this with Sun Studio 11. My config.site looks like this: #! /bin/sh AR="/usr/ccs/bin/ar" TEX="/usr/local/teTeX/bin/i386-pc-solaris2.10/tex" LATEX="/usr/local/teTeX/bin/i386-pc-solaris2.10/latex" PDFTEX="/usr/local/teTeX/bin/i386-pc-solaris2.10/pdftex"

Hello, Apologies for the post here. I have read the R-Admin (learned a lot!) and searched the web for days, but still fail at compiling R on my Ultra 20 running solaris 10 x86 1/06. This is the tail of './configure' output: ..... checking for dlopen in -ldl... yes checking readline/history.h usability... no checking readline/history.h presence... no checking for readline/history.h... no

Hi, I'm working on a server with a sparcv9 chip using SunOS 5.9 Generic May 2002. The compilers are the Sun Studio 12 compilers. I'm trying to build a 64-bit version of R-2.6.1, and while the configure script runs, the make does not. Here are the options I set in config.site: ________________________________________________________________________ _ R_PAPERSIZE=letter CC="cc

Hi, I'm not sure what I'm doing wrong here. With the single source file attached to this email, I tried the following commands: llvmgcc -o timeLLVMfft timeLLVMfft.c -lm llc -o timeLLVMfft.s timeLLVMfft.bc /opt/SUNWspro/bin/cc -xarch=v9 -o timeLLVMfft.sparc timeLLVMfft.s I got the errors at the bottom of this email in response to the last command. On the other hand, gcc v2.95.3 had

Hi all, I have trouble to compile Matrix packages on Solar10 x86-64 with Sun compilers. I saw some postings on this but am not sure how to solve this problem. It is becoming critical as I cannot install biocLite() because of its dependency on Matrix. Could you direct me how to resolve the issue? Thanks in advance! Dongseok R version 2.8.1 (2008-12-22) Copyright (C) 2008 The R Foundation for

Hello, I tried to compile v2.3.1 on Solaris x86 with SUN Pro compilers. I had an error while stats libarary was being compiled and I notice that "-xtarget=generic64" was not passed to f95 while cc used it. Could you tell me how to fix this problem? f95 -PIC -O -I/mounts/devel/SUNWspro/prod/include -c sgram.f -o sgram.o f95 -PIC -O -I/mounts/devel/SUNWspro/prod/include -c

Hmnnn... This is the third version of R I have installed and I am stumped on this one. There is some unresolved external I cannot find... /opt/SUNWspro/bin/cc -v -o R.bin CConverters.o Rdynload.o RNG.o apply.o arithmetic.o array.o attrib.o bind.o builtin.o character.o coerce.o colors.o complex.o connections.o context.o cov.o cum.o dcf.o datetime.o debug.o devPS.o devPicTeX.o deparse.o

Hello, I''m having problems compiling Ruby 1.8.5 on a 64-bit Intel machine running Solaris 10 U3. I''m using Sun Studio 12 for building an optimized package for our company. We''re not interested in coolstack (from Sun used with GCC). Any help below would be appreciated: root@host # uname -an SunOS host 5.10 Generic_125101-08 i86pc i386 i86pc Solaris root@host # isainfo

System details: -------------- Sun Blade 1000, Solaris 8, Sun ONE Compiler Suite (rebranded Forte 7), R versions 1.6.0 and 1.6.2 - suspect others are affected, too Problem description: ------------------- Using the recommended env var setting from p.15 of the Admin Guide, the configure script fails the sgemm sunperf test, even though the sunperf libraries are available Not linking with

Sandeep Patel wrote: > My goal is to have Cortex-A9 support complete in far less than three > months. I've recently gotten some additional help toward that goal, so > the pace should pick up soon. > > As far as compiler texts, there are many newer texts to recommend as > just about all the major optimization passes are done differently > after SSA-form appeared in about

Hello! I was trying to build OpenOffice using all of my 4 CPUs. To be able to do other work on the machine comfortably, I ran the build under nice, and assigned real-time priority to the two Xorg processes. The build started at about 23:10 last night, and hung at 23:46. The procstat output for the make's process group is: PID PPID PGID SID TSID THR LOGIN WCHAN EMUL

Hello. I have been trying to check, how llvm works on Solaris recently. First I have tested lli, whitch seems to execute the bytecode generated on Linux without any problems. However, llc has failed to generate valid SPARC assembler code even on the helloworld example. Here is the generated code: sakharov at trillian:~$ cat ./test.s .text .align 16 .globl main