similar to: Ask alpha cronbach and Hoyt method

¿existe algún método en el cual no sea necesario hacer este trabajo y que aparezcan los nombres de las preguntas? label.cronbach <- label.var(p01, "¿Le agrada el programa que se le ha mostrado? ") label.cronbach <- label.var(p02, "¿Cree que ayuda en el aprendizaje?") label.cronbach <- label.var(p03, "¿Propicia el trabajo en el equipo?") label.cronbach

rm(list = ls()) #borra todo lo anterior en memoria setwd("G:/Public/Documents/R/EPICALC/") #como se llama la data desde su path sanda<-read.csv("sandavid2.csv",header=TRUE, sep=",", dec=".") use(sanda) attach (sanda) library (MASS) label.cronbach <- label.var(p01, "¿Consume mucho pan? ") ####¿Hay alguna manera de nombrarlos

Dear Listers: I used cronbach{psy} to evaluate the internal consistency and some set of variables gave me alpha=-1.1003, while other, alpha=-0.2; alpha=0.89; and so on. I am interested in knowing how to interpret 1. negative value 2. negative value less than -1. I also want to re-mention my previous question about how to evaluate the consistency of a set of variables and about the total

hie 1...i'm trying to carryout a relibility testusing cronbach's alpha what fuctin do i use. 2.. this is more of a statistical question.if the alpha value for all the variables is negative what does it mean. and if the alpha value is negative for all tyha variables but is greater than 0.7 for some sections of the variables what does that mean thanks in advance

Hi list members Any easy way to get standardized cronbach's alpha for a scale, as in SPSS? Thanks Steve Powell proMENTE social research research | evaluation | training & consulting Kranj?evi?eva 35, 71000 Sarajevo mobile: +387 61 215 997 | office: +387 33 556 865 | fax: +387 33 556 866 Checked by AVG Free Edition. 17:44

Erin Hodgess wrote: > Date: Mon, 05 Jun 2006 08:05:04 +0200 > From: Tom Backer Johnsen <backer at psych.uib.no> > User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.4 (Windows/20060516) > MIME-Version: 1.0 > To: r-help at stat.math.ethz.ch > References: <4481F48B.6090308 at imst.math.uni-magdeburg.de> > In-Reply-To: <4481F48B.6090308 at imst.math.uni-magdeburg.de> >

Hola, Todos estamos muy bien, gracias. Con respecto de tu consulta, creo que ofreces poca información para poder reproducir o intentar emular tu inquietud (aunque en este grupo de voluntarios hay gente muy hábil que seguramente podrá ayudarte mejor). Yo me pregunto, por ejemplo: ¿cómo son tus datos originalmente?¿los estás leyendo de otro programa?¿los tienes en un texto plano?¿podrías enviar

¿existe algún método en el cual no sea necesario hacer este trabajo y que aparezcan los nombres de las preguntas? label.cronbach <- label.var(p01, "¿Le agrada el programa que se le ha mostrado? ") label.cronbach <- label.var(p02, "¿Cree que ayuda en el aprendizaje?") label.cronbach <- label.var(p03, "¿Propicia el trabajo en el equipo?") label.cronbach

Estimado José, Es la segunda vez que veo te pregunta en este Foro, la primera vez se te pidió mas detalles y luego se te dio una respuesta. El hecho que reiteres tu pregunta, sin detalles y sin mencionar que es lo que no funcionó con la respuesta anterior, me hace recordar algunas recomendaciones que leí en una excelente respuesta en http://stackoverflow.com/, que trato de adaptar a

It sounds as thought you are interested in Hoyt's Anova which is a form of generalizability theory. This is usually estimated using by getting the variance components from ANOVA. > -----Original Message----- > From: r-help-bounces at stat.math.ethz.ch > [mailto:r-help-bounces at stat.math.ethz.ch] On Behalf Of Karl Knoblick > Sent: Tuesday, May 16, 2006 6:10 AM > To: r-help at

Hi, What package would you recommend for analyzing the validity/reliability of multiple choice tests. Doing things such as classical test analysis, factor analysis, item response theory. I've used psychometric (item.exam), MiscPsycho (alpha.Summary), and ltm (rcor.test). MiscPsycho reported the numbers most similar to what I get in SPSS: corrected point biserial correlations,

A short function I wrote for the purpose of evaluating scales made up of a number of questionnaire items. It provides Cronbach's Alpha, both unstandardized and based on standardized items. It also provides item statistics which include item-total correlations (corrected) and item-removed alpha. Thought some of you might find it useful. I would also appreciate any programming tips or

Dear All, I am a novice in R and am working on my thesis for master's in Epidemiology & Biostatistics. While calculating Cronbach's alpha for the SF-36 questionnaire, I got all 8 of them more than 1. Is it possible to get alpha more than 1. If yes, please help me understand it. I read about the negative alpha value on your web postings. It does not answer my question though. Thank you.

Hi all, I am trying to teach myself to use and program R (How else do you do it? lol) Anyway, I wrote a piece of code to compute coefficent alpha for a scale. As I am neither a statistician nor a programmer, I wanted people's feedback. The code appears to work (Win 95 with R 1.0.1) and I have verified my result with SPSS and it was correct (much to my astonishment!). Nonetheless, I am

I'm new in both R and statistics. I "did my homework", I tried the archives and whatever I managed to get from the sources, but still I need assistance with the plsr package. I have a model with 2 core determinants D1 and D2, made by 3 indicators each (D1a,D1b,D1c and so on). Also I have 2 moderating variables (m1,m2), where m1 moderates D1 and m2 modarates D2. The dependent

I am taking a behavioral stats graduate class and the instructor is using SPSS. I'm trying to follow along in R. Recently in class we started working with scales and survey data, computing Cronbach's Alpha, reversing values for reverse coded items, etc. Also, SPSS has some built in functionality for entering the meta-data for your survey, e.g. the possible values for items, the text of

Dear Kevin, In addition to the advice you've received, take a look at the survey package. It's not quite what you're asking for, but in fact it's probably more useful, in that it provides correct statistical inference for data collected in complex surveys. The package is described in an article, T. Lumley (2004), Analysis of complex survey samples, Journal of Statistical Software

I use rsync to backup my system, using a command-line such as the following: > rsync [src] [dst] -a --link-dest --size-only In this case, [src] is produced by a command that makes no attempt to preserve timestamps ("svnadmin hotcopy", in this case). That's why I use --size-only. Here's the rub: identical files aren't hard-linked like I expect them to be. They're full

When I run net add groupmap rid=512 ntgroup="Domain Admins" UNIXgroup="ntadmins" i get this error: adding entry for group Domain Admins failed! The error isn't very specific and the log doesn't show any error. I look in the log (log level -1 in slapd.conf) and I can tell it is able to search. I can post the syslog if you need it. I think their is an error in my

I can use data() to find the available datasets in a package, but I'd like to extract and display some additional information for each dataset than what is provided by data(), e.g., class() and dim() for datasets for which these are available. I'm stuck on using using lapply properly with objects, rather than the names of objects that I get from data() Example: > DS <-