similar to: zero random effect sizes with binomial lmer [sorry, ignore previous]

> > If one compares the random effect estimates, in fact, one sees that > > they are in the correct proportion, with the expected signs. They are > > just approximately eight orders of magnitude too small. Is this a bug? > > BLUPs are essentially shrinkage estimates, where shrinkage is > determined with magnitude of variance. Lower variance more > shrinkage towards

I am fitting models to the responses to a questionnaire that has seven yes/no questions (Item). For each combination of Subject and Item, the variable Response is coded as 0 or 1. I want to include random effects for both Subject and Item. While I understand that the datasets are fairly small, and there are a lot of invariant subjects, I do not understand something that is happening

I am using mice package for multiple imputation. For one data (attached), mice doesn't impute all missing values. Specifically, some variables were not imputed at all. the reproducible code library(mice) test.df<-read.table(c:\\test.txt',header=T,sep=',') mi<-mice(test.df,maxit=10,m=5) sum(is.na(complete(mi,1))) >129 and x41, x50... were not imputed at all. Any

I have been struggling all day to import a particular function/method combination (ranef(), which extracts the random effects from a mixed model fit) from the nlme package into another package ... so far without success. The NAMESPACE for nlme contains the following lines: export(..., ranef, ...) S3method(ranef, lme) ranef is defined as a standard S3 generic, function (object, ...)

The coxme package has a ranef() method, as does lme4. I'm having trouble getting them to play together, as shown below. (The particular model in the example isn't defensible, but uses a standard data set.) The problem is that most of the time only one of lme4 or coxme will be loaded, so each needs to define the basic ranef function as well as a method for it. But when loaded together

User of the coxme library (mixed effects Cox models) are instructed to use ranef(), fixed(), VarCorr(), etc to retrieve bits out of a fitted model; it purposely uses the same methods as nlme and/or lmer. The current behavior is to "depend" on nlme. If I defined the methods myself in coxme, then someone who had both nlme and coxme loaded will suffer from "last loaded wins",

library(nlme) data(Phenobarb) na.include <- function(x)x phe1 <- nlme(conc~phenoModel(Subject, time, dose, lCl, lV), data = Phenobarb, fixed = lCl+lV~1, random= pdDiag(lCl+lV~1), start = c(-5,0), na.action = na.include, naPattern = ~!is.na(conc)) phe.ranef <- ranef(phe1,augFrame=TRUE) plot(phe.ranef, form=lCl~Wt+ApgarInd) [Error in max(length(x0),

Version 2.2 of coxme has been posted to CRAN, Windows versions and mirrors should appear in due course. This is a major update with three features of note: 1. A non-upwardly compatable change: Extractor functions: beta= fixed effects, b=random effects nlme lme4 coxme <2.2 coxme 2.2 lmekin 2.2 ------------------------------------------------------ beta

I'm trying to use the lmeSplines package together with lme4. Below is (1) an example of lmeSplines together with nlme (2) an attempt to use lmeSplines with lme4 (3) then a comparison of the random effects from the two different methods. (1) require(lmeSplines) data(smSplineEx1) dat <- smSplineEx1 dat.lo <- loess(y~time, data=dat) plot(dat.lo) dat$all <- rep(1,nrow(dat)) times20

>>>>> Therneau, Terry M , Ph D <therneau at mayo.edu> >>>>> on Sun, 15 Feb 2015 17:31:00 -0600 writes: > I'm testing out a new version of coxme and R CMD check fails with "could not find function > ranef" (or random.effects or fixef, or anything from nlme). The NAMESPACE file has the > line below >

I really hope sombody could help me with the following, I'm having problems accessing the random effect samples following the example on MCMCsamp: (fm1 <- lmer(Reaction ~ Days + (1|Subject) + (0+Days|Subject), sleepstudy)) set.seed(101); samp0 <- mcmcsamp(fm1, n = 1000, saveb=TRUE) str(samp0) Formal class 'merMCMC' [package "lme4"] with 9 slots ..@ Gp :

I have a model: mod1<-lmer( x ~ (1|rtr)+ trth/(1|cs) , data=dtf) # Here, cs and rtr are crossed random effects. cs 1-5 are of type TRUE, cs 6-10 are of type FALSE, so cs is nested in trth, which is fixed. So for cs I should get a fit for 1-5 and 6-10. This appears to be the case from the random effects: > mean( ranef(mod1)$cs[[1]][1:5] ) [1] -2.498002e-16 > var(

I'm testing out a new version of coxme and R CMD check fails with "could not find function ranef" (or random.effects or fixef, or anything from nlme). The NAMESPACE file has the line below importFrom(nlme, ranef, random.effects, fixef, fixed.effects, VarCorr) and nlme is declared in the DESCRIPTION file as an import. I feel that I must be staring at some obvious (but

> > I'm testing out a new version of coxme and R CMD check fails with "could not find function > > ranef" (or random.effects or fixef, or anything from nlme). The NAMESPACE file has the > > line below > > > importFrom(nlme, ranef, random.effects, fixef, fixed.effects, VarCorr) > > > and nlme is declared in the DESCRIPTION

Dear all, I'm curious about how to interpret the results of the following code. The first model is directly from the help page of lmer; the second is the same model but using the Gamma family with log link. The fixed effects make sense, because y = 251.40510 + 10.46729 * Days is about the same as log(y) = 5.53613298 + 0.03502057 * Days but the random effects seem quite

Using ranef() (package nlme, version 3.1-75) with an 'lme' object I can obtain random effects for intercept and slope of a certain level (say: 1) - this corresponds to (say level 1) "residuals" in MLWin. Maybe I'm mistaken here, but the results are identical. However, if I try to get the standardized random effects adding the paramter "standard=T" to the

Hello R-users, I have been trying to fit what I think is a simple mixed-effects model using lmer (from lme4), but I've run into some difficulty that I have not been able to resolve using the existing archives or Pinheiro and Bates (2000). I am measuring populations (of birds) which change with time at a number of different sites. These sites are grouped into regions. Sites are not measured

Hi, I'm trying to assign a score to each row which allow me to identify which rows differ. In the example file below, I've used "," to indicate column separators. In this example, I'd like to identify that row 1 and row 5 are the same, and row 2 and row 4 are teh same. Any help much appreciated. Also, any comments on what the command lines do would be fantastic. Thanks!!

On 16/02/2015 8:20 AM, Therneau, Terry M., Ph.D. wrote: > >> > I'm testing out a new version of coxme and R CMD check fails with "could not find function >> > ranef" (or random.effects or fixef, or anything from nlme). The NAMESPACE file has the >> > line below >> >> > importFrom(nlme, ranef, random.effects, fixef,

Hi I'm getting the intercepts of the Random effects as 0. Please help me to understand why this is coming Zero This is my R code Data<- read.csv("C:/FE and RE.csv") Formula="Y~X2+X3+X4 + (1|State) + (0+X5|State)" fit=lmer(formula=Formula,data=Data) ranef(fit). My sample Data State Year Y X2 X3 X4 X5 X6 S2 1960 27.8 397.5 42.2 50.7 78.3 65.8 S1 1960 29.9 413.3 38.1