similar to: newbie estimating survival curve w/ survfit for coxph

I am wondering how to estimate the survival curve for a particular case(s) given a coxph model using this example code: #fit a cox proportional hazards model and plot the #predicted survival curve fit <- coxph( Surv(futime,fustat)~resid.ds+strata(rx)+ecog.ps+age,data=ovarian[1:23,]) z <- survfit(fit,newdata=ovarian[24:26,],individual=F) zs <- z$surv zt <-

[code]>require("survival") > coxph(Surv(futime,fustat)~age + strata(rx),ovarian) Call: coxph(formula = Surv(futime, fustat) ~ age + strata(rx), data = ovarian) coef exp(coef) se(coef) z p age 0.137 1.15 0.0474 2.9 0.0038 Likelihood ratio test=12.7 on 1 df, p=0.000368 n= 26, number of events= 12 > coxph(Surv(futime,fustat)~age, ovarian, subset=rx==1)

Hello: In the example below (or for a censored data) using survfit.coxph, can anyone point me to a link or a pdf as to how the probabilities appearing in bold under "summary(pred$surv)" are calculated? Do these represent acumulative probability distribution in time (not including censored time)? Thanks very much, parmee *fit <- coxph(Surv(futime, fustat) ~ age, data = ovarian)*

Hi all, Using: R version 2.8.1 Patched (2009-03-07 r48068) on OSX (10.5.6) with survival version: Version: 2.35-3 Date: 2009-02-10 I get the following using the first example in ?summary.survfit: > summary( survfit( Surv(futime, fustat)~1, data=ovarian)) Call: survfit(formula = Surv(futime, fustat) ~ 1, data = ovarian) time n.risk n.event survival

I am confused when trying the function survfit. my question is: what does the survival curve given by plot.survfit mean? is it the survival curve with different covariates at different points? or just the baseline survival curve? for example, I run the following code and get the survival curve #### library(survival) fit<-coxph(Surv(futime,fustat)~resid.ds+rx+ecog.ps,data=ovarian)

Hi John, Brilliant solution and the best sort - when you finally solve your problem by yourself. Jim On Thu, Oct 1, 2020 at 2:52 AM array chip <arrayprofile at yahoo.com> wrote: > > Hi Jim, > > I found out why clip() does not work with lines(survfit.object)! > > If you look at code of function survival:::lines.survfit, in th middle of the code: > > do.clip <-

Hi Dear R-users I have a database with 18000 observations and 20 variables. I am running cox regression on five variables and trying to use survfit to plot the survival based on a specific variable without success. Lets say I have the following coxph: >library(survival) >fit <- coxph(Surv(futime, fustat) ~ age + rx, data = ovarian) >fit what I am trying to do is plot a survival

I am using the coxph, survfit and summary.survfit functions to calculate an estimate of predicted survival with confidence interval for future patients based on the survival distribution of an existing cohort of subjects. I am trying to understand the calculation and interpretation of the std.err and confidence intervals printed by the summary.survfit function. Using the default confidence

For a fitted Cox model, one can either produce the predicted survival curve for a particular "hypothetical" subject (survfit), or the predicted curve for a particular cohort of subjects (survexp). See chapter 10 of Therneau and Grambsch for a long discussion of the differences between these, and the various pitfalls. By default, survfit produces the curve for a hypothetical

Dear all, I am confused with the output of survfit.coxph. Someone said that the survival given by summary(survfit.coxph) is the baseline survival S_0, but some said that is the survival S=S_0^exp{beta*x}. Which one is correct? By the way, if I use "newdata=" in the survfit, does that mean the survival is estimated by the value of covariates in the new data frame? Thank you very much!

It seems to me that summary for ridge coxph() prints summary but returns NULL. It is not a big issue because one can calculate statistics directly from a coxph.object. However, for some reason the score test is not calculated for ridge coxph(), i.e score nor rscore components are not included in the coxph object when ridge is specified. Please find the code below. I use 2.9.2 R with 2.35-4 version

It seems to me that R returns the unpenalized log-likelihood for the ratio likelihood test when ridge regression Cox proportional model is implemented. Is this as expected? In the example below, if I am not mistaken, fit$loglik[2] is unpenalized log-likelihood for the final estimates of coefficients. I would expect to get the penalized log-likelihood. I would like to check if this is as expected.

Dear all, I am using R 3.4.3 on Windows 10. I am preparing some teaching materials and I'm having trouble matching the by-hand version with the R code. I have fitted a Cox model - let's use the ovarian data as an example: library(survival) data(ovarian) ova_mod <- coxph(Surv(futime,fustat)~age+rx,data=ovarian) If I want to make predict survival for a new set of individuals at 100

I would like to be able to construct hazard rates (or unconditional death prob) for many subjects from a given survfit. This will involve adjusting the ( n.event/n.risk) with (coxph object )$linear.predictors I must be having another silly day as I cannot reproduce the linear predictor: fit <- coxph(Surv(futime, fustat) ~ age, data = ovarian) fit$linear.predictors[1] [1] 2.612756

Dear All: I have some questions about the output of coxph. Below is the input and output: ---------------------------------------- > coxph(formula = Surv(futime, fustat) ~ age + rx + ecog.ps, data = + ovarian, x = TRUE) Call: coxph(formula = Surv(futime, fustat) ~ age + rx + ecog.ps, data = ovarian, x = TRUE) coef exp(coef) se(coef) z p age 0.147 1.158

Dear all, I am doing library(survival) fit <- coxph(Surv(futime,fustat) ~ rx, ovarian) plot(survfit(fit,newdata=ovarian),col=c(1,2)) legend("bottomleft", legend=c("rx = 0", "rx = 1"), lty=c(1,2),col=c(1,2)) Is this correct to compare these two groups? Is the 0.31 the p-value that the median f two groups are equal Why lty does not work here? Many thanks

Hello, I am having some trouble with the 'censoring-adjusted C-index' by Uno et al, in the package survAUC. The relevant function is UnoC. The question has to do with what happens when I specify a time point t for the upper limit of the time range under consideration (we want to avoid using the right-end tail of the KM curve). Copying from the example in the help file: TR <-

Hello everyone, I tried to use coxph.detail() to get the hazard function. But a warning messge always returns to me, even in the example provided by its help document: > ?coxph.detail > fit <- coxph(Surv(futime,fustat) ~ age + rx + ecog.ps, ovarian, x=TRUE) > fitd <- coxph.detail(fit) Warning message: data length [37] is not a sub-multiple or multiple of the number of rows

Dear UseR, I do not know if this a problem with me, my data or cph/survest in package design. The example below works with a standard data set, but not with my data, but I cannot locate the problem. Note that I am using an older package of survival to avoid a problem with the newly renamed function in survival meeting Design. Dieter # First, check standard example to make sure library(Design)

Hi, Is it normal to get intercept in the list of covariates in the output of survreg function with standard error, z, p.value etc? Does it mean that intercept was fitted with the covariates? Does Value column represent coefficients or some thing else? Regards, ------------------------------------------------- tmp = survreg(Surv(futime, fustat) ~ ecog.ps + rx, ovarian,