similar to: Getting rid of "outer box" in cloud()

I would like to eliminate the outer box around a lattice wireframe graph, but the usual recommended solution, which is to assign a color of 'transparent' to the axis.line parameter, eliminates ticks if the 'arrows=F' command is used, as shown in the following example: test = data.frame(expand.grid(c(1:10), c(1:10))) z = test[,1] + test[,2] test = cbind(test, z) names(test) =

I would like to remove the outermost box from my wireframe plots -- this is the box that is automatically generated, and is not the inner cube that frames the data. There was a thread on this 4 yrs ago but none of the fixes work (e.g., grid.newpage(), grid.lines(gp = gpar(col = NA)) or par.box=list(col=1),col=NA. These just make the data or the cube disappear. Has anyone solved this issue?

Per the message from Alexander Nervedi, 29 April 2006: > I have to be making a riddiculously silly ommission. > when I run the fillowing i get the cloud plot ok. But I cant figure > out what I am missing out when I call wireframe. > Any help would be appreciated. > x<-runif(100) > y<-rnorm(100) > z<-runif(100) > temp <-data.frame(x,y,z) >

I have a question about wireframe 3-D plots and how to apply colors. I have a large dataset of river flow (m^3/s) over time, and I have coded these flows based on their height. I would like to produce a wireframe plot that colors the graph based on the flow code, i.e. I would like high flows to be red, medium to be green and low flows to be blue. Here is some sample data with the basic

Hi, I'm trying to plot an equation in two variables to get a feel for sensitivity to its parameters. I've run expand.grid to get made-up vectors of the combinations of the two independent variables, and am trying to plot the output of the dependent, M, against both the dependent in a 3d space. t <- 0:100 DBH <- 10:100 TxDBH<-expand.grid(t,DBH) time<-TxDBH[,1]

Is there a way to change the direction in which an axis is plotted in cloud/wireframe? For example, for the following code: g <- expand.grid(x = 1:10, y = 5:15, gr = 1:2) g$z <- log((g$x^g$g + g$y^2) * g$gr) wireframe(z ~ x * y, data = g, groups = gr, scales = list(arrows = FALSE), drape = TRUE, colorkey = TRUE, screen = list(z = 80, x = -60)) Is there a

#Hi, # #somebody knows how to remove the outer box around a wireframe and reduce the height # # test = data.frame(expand.grid(c(1:10), c(1:10))) z = test[,1] + test[,2] test = cbind(test, z) names(test) = c("x", "y", "z") require(lattice) wireframe(z ~ x*y, data = test, par.box = c(col = "transparent") ) #not this one but the remaining outer box.

Hi, I was wondering if there is a way to adjust the shape of the box around the wireframe. By default this box is always a cube. For instance, is it possible to cut this cube into two halfs each half being a 3d rectangle? Or just plot a 3d rectangle with a wireframe inside and adjusted axes? So far I've read "Lattice: Multivariate Data Visualization with R" and searched through the

All, I am wondering how one might add a reference line or plane to a cloud or wireframe plot. I have been unable to figure this out. Let's say I would like to draw a reference for some value of wt in the example below: cl <- 54.1 age <- 10:80 wt <- 25:160 sim <- expand.grid(age = age,wt = wt) sim$cl <- cl*(sim$wt/70)**0.412 * (sim$age/50)**0.152

Dear expeRts, I would like to add two points to a wireframe plot. The points have (x,y,z) coordinates where z is determined to be on the wireframe [same z-value]. Now something strange happens. One point is perfectly plotted, the other isn't shown at all. It only appears if I move it upwards in z-direction by adding a positive number. So somehow it disappears in the wireframe-surface

Hi, I have the following problem. Calling wireframe within a loop results into an empty window(s) #generate some data temp = expand.grid(A = 1:3,B = 1:3) temp = cbind(temp, y1 = rnorm(9)) temp = cbind(temp, y2 = runif(9)) #plot y1 and y2 in two different windows for(i in 1:2) { wireframe(y1 ~ A*B, temp, shade =T) windows() wireframe(y2 ~ A*B, temp, shade =T) } #However, calling it twice

Hello R-classicist won't like the following question due to there's no minimal reproducible example and the question was posted already. Anyway I'm not able understand this rather complicated version of "add points to wireframe". what I have is matrix 3x2000 with a dem<-(x,y,z, coordinates) (not provided). with follwing code I want to produce the wireframe and add some

Hello, I try to increase the distance between tick labels and ticks in a lattice wireframe plot. Here's a minimal example: ## Minimal example x <- y <- z <- c(1,2,3) df <- data.frame(x, y, z) wireframe(z ~ x*y, df, scales = list(arrows = FALSE, col = "black", font = 1, tck=0.6)) I tried the axis.components option

Hello Dear, I have a function, like z=f(x,y), and try a surface plot with this function. But, on the reference of "wireframe" requires data option, so I generated x and y, and computed z with them. But, still I have a problem to draw a surface plot. The code and errors are ################################################## mle_beta0=64.43707; mle_beta1=-24365.16; # generating for

A quick question. I'm trying to plot a surface from a fitted model along with the original points, as in the following example: df<-data.frame(expand.grid(100*runif(1:100), 100*runif(1:100))) df$Var3<-rnorm(length(df$Var1), mean=df$Var1*df$Var2, sd=10) my.lm<-lm(Var3 ~ Var1*Var2, data=df) my.fun<-function(x,y) predict(my.lm, data.frame(Var1=x, Var2=y),

Hi all, I'd like to plot the Real and Imaginary parts of some f(z) as two different surfaces in wireframe (the row/column axes are the real and imag axes). I know I can do it by, roughly speaking, something like plotz <- expand.grid(x={range of Re(z)}, y={range of Im(z), groups=1:2) plotz$func<-c(Re(f(z),Im(f(z)) wireframe(func~x*y,data=plotz,groups=groups) But that seems like a

I'm trying to create a 3D plot using wireframe with certain parts removed. I would like to get rid of the part of the outer cube that crosses over the plot leaving the back two walls and the axes. It would also be useful to put lines in the plot separate from the wireframe call. I've looked through the documentation and have not been able to find such a request. Here is my code

Hello, I am trying to get a surface plot of a data set that looks like the following, 1 2 5.6 5 9 2.4 9 8 9.8 ... to (60,000 rows down) From my homework, the persp function only works with evenly spaced data points with the z data beeing in a matrix. my data is not in that format. the wireframe fxn gives me an error, no applicable method for "wireframe" the

Hi, one of the nice things about contour is that it labels all contour lines. contourplot only labels each particular elevation a single time. i.e., if there are two contour lines corresponding to z = 45, it will only label one of them. is there a way to get contourplot to automatically label all the contour lines, even those that are repeated? i ask because i want to plot contour plots *w/

Hello Everyone, I am using R ver. 2.10.1 (2009-12-14). I installed lattice today via install.packages. I am doing this minimal example: M = read.csv("/path/to/csv") cloud(x ~ y * z, data = M) this correctly gives me a scatterplot of the csv data which has 3 columns. Every column contains 1800 numeric 0 < values < 1300 when I want to plot the corresponding wireframe via