similar to: Tree package

Dear All, I am new to R and can see it is a very powerful and versatile system for programming and statistical analysis. Say I have written a simple function and want to use it on a regular basis. I have the file as a text file say 'c:\R-funcs\func.txt' how do I get R to find it on the hard disc or alternatively where is the default location for looking up functions where I can place

Hi, I'm using a loop to extract 2 columns from an array into multiple files. I can use the following to export 3 files, containing column 'ID' with one of the three event columns. > ID<-c("A","B","C","D","E","F") > event1<-c(0,1,0,0,1,0) > event2<-c(1,1,0,1,0,0) > event3<-c(1,0,1,0,1,0) >

Hello, I have this user that lost an email, even when the server is set up to do lazy expunge. The mail server logs show that the message was received, the user also read it and he did reply to it. here is the mail.log Jun 29 07:52:48 mx20 postfix/smtpd[19289]: 0ACD81C443B: client=usxsl050.slb.atosorigin-asp.com[199.6.139.15] Jun 29 07:52:48 mx20 postfix/cleanup[20259]: 0ACD81C443B:

Hello kanglin: Try to transfer from Java Object JList to R Object Data.frame, you could use public Rconnection r_connection = null; ..... ..... this.r_connection.assign("dataframe_ex",java list_ex); Best regards, Ricky Chen EIM ProMOS Technologies Inc. No.19 Li Hsin Rd.,Science-Based Industrial Park, HsinChu,Taiwan,R.O.C. Tel: 886-3-5798308 Ext : 8512 http://www.promos.com.tw

On Fri, Dec 16, 2011 at 01:51:57AM -0500, David Fang wrote: > Hi, > Thanks for the quick reply again. > >> On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 1:17 PM, David Fang <fang at csl.cornell.edu> wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> I've bootstrapped llvm/clang from svn-trunk on powerpc-darwin8 (g++-4.0.1), and >>> have the following test results to share. >>>

Hi, For anyone who might be interested, I've thrown together a little page to track my builds of llvm and clang, both release 3.0 and svn-trunk, on powerpc-darwin8. http://www.csl.cornell.edu/~fang/sw/llvm/ I'll update the list of logs each time I svn-update and build. It's nowhere as nice as a real buildbot page, but it's better than nothing. 3.0 still has over 20 test

18.01.2012, 02:46, "David Fang" <fang at csl.cornell.edu>: > Hi, >          For anyone who might be interested, I've thrown together a little > page to track my builds of llvm and clang, both release 3.0 and > svn-trunk, on powerpc-darwin8. > > http://www.csl.cornell.edu/~fang/sw/llvm/ > > I'll update the list of logs each time I svn-update and

On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 10:51:38PM +0400, Konstantin Tokarev wrote: > > > 18.01.2012, 02:46, "David Fang" <fang at csl.cornell.edu>: > > Hi, > > ?????????For anyone who might be interested, I've thrown together a little > > page to track my builds of llvm and clang, both release 3.0 and > > svn-trunk, on powerpc-darwin8. > > > >

Hi, Thanks for the quick reply again. > On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 1:17 PM, David Fang <fang at csl.cornell.edu> wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I've bootstrapped llvm/clang from svn-trunk on powerpc-darwin8 (g++-4.0.1), and >> have the following test results to share. >> Summary below, full log at: >>

On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 1:17 PM, David Fang <fang at csl.cornell.edu> wrote: > Hi, > > I've bootstrapped llvm/clang from svn-trunk on powerpc-darwin8 (g++-4.0.1), and > have the following test results to share. > Summary below, full log at: > http://www.csl.cornell.edu/~fang/sw/llvm/r146586-powerpc-darwin8-results.txt > > The only edits required were those I

Hi, > ----- Original Message ----- >>> ----- Original Message ----- >>>> Hi all, >>>> My recent commit r187027 fixed a simple oversight of forgetting >>>> to >>>> check for __ppc__ (only checking __powerpc__), which broke my >>>> powerpc-apple-darwin8 stage1 tests, since the system gcc only >>>> provided

Hi, I've been slowly but steadily working towards enabling the Mach-O/PPC backend for MC, starting with the mach-o relocation entry translation. patches/logs: http://www.csl.cornell.edu/~fang/sw/llvm/ git: http://github.com/fangism/llvm/tree/powerpc-darwin8 git: http://github.com/fangism/clang/tree/powerpc-darwin8 I've managed to get the simplest single-function-call hello-world

Dear all, I an running R on a Windows 2000 machine (1.5Gb RAM) and am trying to load the lme4 package, however, whenever I attempt to load the library "lme4" I get the following error message I have installed lme4 and Matrix locally from the zip file with no problems. R version 2.6.2 (2008-02-08) Copyright (C) 2008 The R Foundation for Statistical Computing ISBN 3-900051-07-0

I''m fairly new to both Xen and Linux, my boss wants me to try and get Xen working on a new dual core running both Windows and QNX (we need to do some real time processing). Ideally he wants Windows to be a host (although from what I have read this isn''t possible yet?) and QNX as a guest. I''m guessing a Linux Dom0 will be needed and then the others run as guests. Does

----- Original Message ----- > > ----- Original Message ----- > >> Hi all, > >> My recent commit r187027 fixed a simple oversight of forgetting > >> to > >> check for __ppc__ (only checking __powerpc__), which broke my > >> powerpc-apple-darwin8 stage1 tests, since the system gcc only > >> provided > >> __ppc__. I was

Hi, I've bootstrapped llvm/clang from svn-trunk on powerpc-darwin8 (g++-4.0.1), and have the following test results to share. Summary below, full log at: http://www.csl.cornell.edu/~fang/sw/llvm/r146586-powerpc-darwin8-results.txt The only edits required were those I posted to llvm-commits yesterday (re: "some missing clang libs"). And I also edited LitConfig.py to point to

This works great. > You can also try using the gllvm wrapper: https://github.com/SRI-CSL/gllvm ; it's quite reliable and easy to use in my experience. Just to be sure. Only one version of bc file will be generated that corresponds to the compiler options provide at configure? The original approach using ld.gold will provide several .bc files that correspond to different stages of the

> ----- Original Message ----- >> Hi all, >> My recent commit r187027 fixed a simple oversight of forgetting to >> check for __ppc__ (only checking __powerpc__), which broke my >> powerpc-apple-darwin8 stage1 tests, since the system gcc only >> provided >> __ppc__. I was wondering if this justifies using simpler macros like >> >> #define

Hi all, My recent commit r187027 fixed a simple oversight of forgetting to check for __ppc__ (only checking __powerpc__), which broke my powerpc-apple-darwin8 stage1 tests, since the system gcc only provided __ppc__. I was wondering if this justifies using simpler macros like #define LLVM_PPC (defined(__ppc__) || defined(__powerpc__) ...) #define LLVM_PPC64 (defined(__ppc64__) ||

Hi, according to cluster file system logic and from my testing experience on other FS, the more nodes add into clustered file system, the more performance degradation it will have, two questions: 1. Is it possible to tune ocfs2 so that the performance issue wouldn't be a breakdown problem? 2. How many cluster nodes do you guys experience will have major performance issue? The fs we use is 90%