similar to: Where to put customization of plugin?

One of the things I like about Rails is the built-in support for testing ? it?s almost hard not to write tests. But even if I write extensive tests (currently ?Code to Test Ratio: 1:3.4? according to rake stats in a small toy project) I still feel that it?s not enough. I occasionally get the urge to fire up the browser and click around to test that everything works. You shouldn?t have to

I''ve just released a new version of Selenium on Rails[1]. It''s a plugin that makes it easy to test Rails applications through browsers using Selenium [2]. The major new features are exprimental support for running all tests through a Rake task (which launches any number of browsers) and a new format RSelenese. The Rake task has a few rough edges so I would appreciate if

link_to_remote generates the javascript: new Ajax.Updater(...). Have I missed something or doesn''t this handle browsers with javascript support but without XHR support? What I''d like to do is: 1. If the browser supports XHR, use XHR 2. If the browser supports javascript (and perhaps even if the XHR request fails) do a POST via javascript 3. If the browser doesn''t

Hi, I really like selenium, and I just tried the plugin created Jonas Bengtsson. However I cannot get it to run on rails 1.1 and coundn''t find anyone complaining about it? Did anyone get it to run on rails 1.1.2? Greets, Abdur-Rahman

Hi list I''ve got a bit of a philosophical question. After just having discovered Selenium /Selenium IDE and the rails selenium plugin I''ve realized that it''s a whole lot easier to do functinoal testing than writing the traditional rails functional tests. However it implies that the development database consists of standardized test data (e.g the test & dev

Hi all! I find association collections to be quite hard to understand and use. I have a Leg class that has_many :choices, and a Choice class that belongs_to :leg. In a controller I want to update both a Leg and its Choices. If I do it like this: @leg.choices.update params[:choice].keys, params[:choice].values It updates the database directly (or more specifically only updates records that

Hi, I''m looking to upgrade an application based on rails 1.0, and I have a problem with plugins working fine in development, but not in production or test. Actually, it happens in all environments with their dependency mechanism set to :load. For example for the selenium on rails plugin, it needs the class SeleniumOnRailsConfig, which triggers the dependency on

Hello, what does this message mean ? [Oct 12 14:03:32] DEBUG[9064] chan_sip.c: Trying to put 'SIP/2.0 401' onto UDP socket destined for public_ip:2049 I find this in my debug log file when "core set debug 25". Is something failing, or is this just informative ? Kind regards, Jonas. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

I have a very annoying problem, when doing rake db:migrate, I get the error message: Missing these required gems: will_paginate ~> 2.3.11 But the gem is not missing, It runs very well in my app. To make the rake pass I have to comment out the gem in my environment.rb file. environment.rb: config.gem "will_paginate", :version => "~> 2.3.11", :source =>

Hello, is there anyone who can point me to correct information ? Following http://pbxinaflash.com/forum/showthread.php?t=9042 and http://www.voip-info.org/wiki/view/Asterisk+cdr+mysql > Extending CDR does not result in a working environment for me. Any feedback appreciated. Kind regards, Jonas. -------- Original Message -------- Subject: [asterisk-users] Asterisk 1.6.2.10 & CDR

Hi, I often use the gold plugin's also-emit-llvm option to verify the final LLVM bitcode of a program. However, I realized that the gold plugin generates the bitcode file before running LTO optimizations, such that the changes performed by LTO are not reflected in the bitcode file. What is the reason for this behavior? Attached is a patch that would swap the order of the two actions, and

Hi Jonas, On 04/06/13 10:23, Jonas Wagner wrote: > Hi, > > I often use the gold plugin's also-emit-llvm option to verify the final LLVM > bitcode of a program. However, I realized that the gold plugin generates the > bitcode file before running LTO optimizations, such that the changes performed > by LTO are not reflected in the bitcode file. > > What is the reason for

On 27 January 2017 at 21:54, G?bor Cs?rdi wrote: | On Fri, Jan 27, 2017 at 9:28 PM, Da Zheng <zhengda1936 at gmail.com> wrote: | > What major R platforms does this policy refer to? | > | | Linux, macOS, Windows. | | | > Currently, my package runs in Ubuntu. If it works on both Ubuntu and | > Redhat, does it count as two platforms? | > | | I think that Linux is just one. Is

Does anyone know if it is possible to add a dictionary file of known words that becomes part of the *built* package to tell 'R CMD check --as-cran' not to report these words as misspelled. I want this dictionary to come with the *.tar.gz such that it will be available regardless where the package is checked. For instance, currently I get: * using log directory

I'm trying to index the word "peter-bengtsson" (which is different from "peter" & "bengtsson" and is different from "peterbengtsson") and find it. To start with I'm trying to use a basic python script to get to grips with it. When I do this:: qp = xapian.QueryParser() stemmer = xapian.Stem("english") qp.set_stemmer(stemmer)

I am looking at adding the Sentry plugin to one of the applications that we are working on. I have a need to store some info that will have to be encrypted and decrypted. I have been going through the docs for the plugin and the AsymetricSentry class looks like the best for what we need to do but I am not sure how to generate the key. The docs say: This is a shortcut for using an

> > > I often use the gold plugin's also-emit-llvm option to verify the final > LLVM bitcode of a program. However, I realized that the gold plugin generates >> the >> bitcode file before running LTO optimizations, such that the changes >> performed >> by LTO are not reflected in the bitcode file. >> >> What is the reason for this behavior?

The Apple ld (shipped with Xcode, open-source) saves the 3 files if -save-temps is applied: - xxx.lto.bc : the merged bit-code before IPA - xxx.lto.opt.bc: the optimized bit-code of the *.lto.bc - xxx.lto.o : the object file of xxx.lto.bc I think it is better way to go, often time we need IR both after and after the transformation. On 6/4/13 3:37 AM, Jonas Wagner wrote: > >

Code doesn't just write itself... Jonas Keidel <jonas at jonas-keidel.de> wrote: >I like to reactivate this topic because i don't see any changes at the >last >time... >So what about the topic? > > >2013/8/9 Jonas Keidel <jonas at jonas-keidel.de> > >> 2013/8/7 Jonas Keidel <jonas at jonas-keidel.de> >> >>> >>>

On 4 June 2013 13:36, Shuxin Yang <shuxin.llvm at gmail.com> wrote: > The Apple ld (shipped with Xcode, open-source) saves the 3 files if > -save-temps is applied: > - xxx.lto.bc : the merged bit-code before IPA > - xxx.lto.opt.bc: the optimized bit-code of the *.lto.bc > - xxx.lto.o : the object file of xxx.lto.bc > > I think it is better way to go, often time we