similar to: Bridge configuration on Xen 3.2+

Hi All, I''m using xen 3.0 on CentOS 5 with VLAN. #vconfig add eth0 100 #/etc/xen/script/network- bridge start vifnum=1 netdev=eth0 bridge=xenbr0.100 I know that after xen 3.2 the procedure of bridge configuration is changed. What is the correct command to set bridge interface to vlan? Yukio

Hi all, i need config xen with this ___________ __________ |VM1 |----------------bridge1-------------------| | |__________ | | | ____________ | |-----BALBLA |VM2 |

Hi to the ML. I''m new to VLAN configuration, and combining it to XEN is a bit difficult. I want to use VLAN because it''s possible to "arping" from a domU to an other, and VLAN looks like; the only solution to prevent that. May be I''m wrong if someone got a solution, I may be interrested. I''ve also tryed ebtables, but nothing to prevent arp

Hello! I set up a second bridge for a second nic. i made that manually with brctl addbr br1 ifconfig br1 up is there an "official" way how to configure such a second bridge in ''/etc/xen/*'' regards! _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users

Hi, I've been using CentOS & Xen on a server that has 2 VM's configured. The default configuration includes one physical iface that is propagated (by a default bridge) to the VM's. Since I wanted to configure additional physical iface, define a new bridge and propagate it to the viface-s of the VM's, i configured the bridge/phys. iface and brought it up (here are

Hello all, I have been running xen for a while now with two interfaces: dummy0 for host only communication, and eth0 for the outside network. my script looks like this: (/etc/xen/scripts/network-bridge-more) ------------------------------------------------------------------ #! /bin/sh dir=$(dirname "$0") "$dir/network-bridge" "$@" vifnum=0 netdev=dummy0

----- "Pasi K?rkk?inen" <pasik at iki.fi> wrote: > On Sat, Mar 06, 2010 at 09:04:20AM -0500, Kanwar Ranbir Sandhu wrote: > > Why would one use ConVirt instead of the management tools included in > > RHEL and/or CentOS? What's the difference? > > RHEL/CentOS doesn't provide web-based management.. or even easy > multi-host / cluster management of

Here are three small patches that I have applied to the Fedora xen builds and I think are are suitable for xen-4.1.0. The first patch fixes an anomaly in /etc/xen/scripts/network-route. Currently this script contains netdev=${netdev:-eth${vifnum}} ie. netdev is set to eth${vifnum} by default. Unfortunately vifnum is not set anywhere in the xen code so the default is actually the broken

Hi. I have another question, hopefully easier than my last: Do all physical interfaces in dom0 need to have an IP addresse in order to be used as a bridge by guest domains? I thought that the interface would have to merely be "up" but not necessarily have an IP address configured since bridging is done at layer 2. But alas, if I don''t configure an IP address on dom0 the bridge

Hello, I''m new to Xen (and this mailing-list) and facing some problems with the network. I''m stuck and don''t know how to continue. And Google isn''t very helpful either... My setup: - Ubuntu 7.10 for dom0 and Debian 4.0 for all domU - 4 physical NIC (DHCP from my ISP, internal LAN, DMZ & WLAN) - 1 Dom as firewall/router - 1 domU with internal services

I have a Xen DomU configuration that was made in the days before libvirt and virt-install. In this configuration I have: vif = [ ''mac=00:16:3e:05:06:01, bridge=xenbr0'', ''mac=00:16:3e:05:06:0a, bridge=xenbr1'' ] and then in xend-config.sxp I define (network-script my-network-bridge) where my-network-bridge is in the scripts directory and looks like this:

So Working on CEntOS 5 I am trying to sett up Xen with 2 bridges, one that connects dom0 and most of the domU to the physical card and the out to the network. Got that figured out no problem, now i want to have a second bridge that runs a local network for all the doms that doesn''t connect to the network. With code I have found used in multiple places I can easily get 2 bridges, and

I need to allocate public IP address to two guest os. I have only 2 network card Interface on server. say eth0 and eth1. I set eth1 a public IP address. so it should in # vi /etc/sysconfig/ifcfg-eth1 DEVICE=eth1 BOOTPROTO=static HWADDR=00:1a:4d:83:ad:00 BROADCAST=202.127.29.0 IPADDR=202.127.29.5 NETMASK=255.255.255.0 NETWORK=202.127.29.0 ONBOOT=yes TYPE=Ethernet Question 1: do I have to

Hi All, We have a single Centos 5.11 server running a xen hypervisor that went down hard after an extended power outage this weekend. I'm mostly familiar for KVM as that is the majority of what our guests run under and have tried getting up to speed on xen bridging to no avail. The problem is that after the xen server spun back up, the previously defined xen bridges were lost. I've

Hello, I have a big problem: Dom0 is centos5.1, domU are centos5.1. My setup is really simple, the only thing is that I give 3 nics to the domU so I use a modified network script (which has worked since january... since fedora 6): " #!/bin/sh dir=$(dirname "$0") "$dir/network-bridge" "$@" vifnum=0 "$dir/network-bridge" "$@" vifnum=1

Hey all I''m new to Linux and Virtualizing. I''m trying to dedicate my nic''s to each virtual server. For instance, virt server A would use nic1 and virt server B would use nic2 and so on. I''ve been reading some stuff for this list and to tell you the truth I''m a bit overwhelmed. We are going to run SLES10.1 and Xen. I would appreciate any assistance.

Hi all, Up until now, we''ve been using Xen 3.0 on CentOS 5.x. Under this setup, dom0 was given a virtual ''ethX'' with the original ''ethX'' (now ''pethX'') IP address. Under this older config, neither ''pethX'' or ''xenbrX'' had an IP address. The logic was to keep traffic from the domU''s, through

I have a guest that keeps crashing and want to automatically reboot it when it crashes. See: xen PV guest kernel 2.6.32 processes lock up in D state https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=550724 if you want to look at the details on the crashing. Anyway, I boot the guest with the kernel command line parameter: hung_task_panic=1 I have kernel.panic = 15 in the guest /etc/sysctl.conf

Hi all. What is the canonical way of getting xen to fully work with 802.1q (vlans) ? After (re)searching i found many ways but so far none is working. platform is gentoo (x86/32) and netwerk card a tg3. xen is v3. my config is as follows ... eth0 is simply up (with no ip) and i created several eth0.x interfaces corresponding to several vlans. eth0.10 is de ''default'' vlan

I have a quad core server in which I want to run 4 virtual servers. On this server I have a 1/2 terabyte raid 1 I have split between the 4 members that have the OS on it. I have raid 5 10 terabyte internal storage running on a 3ware 9690a card. I want to share this storage between the servers without partitioning it. Is this possible? -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment