similar to: cache and exception safe around_filter (after_filter)

Do you know of any way for me to stick a meta tag in using a before_filter or after_filter or around_filter? <meta http-equiv="refresh" content="5"/> I have been trying to figure out out and just cannot make sense of it. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails:

i got two controller (with restful actions) where my code is quite ugly and not very dry. every action looks quite like this: if @logged_user.has_role?("admin") User.find(params[:id) else @logged_user.group.user.find(params[:id]) this is a security check that enforce a simple spec: normal user should read/write information only about their group''s users, but

Hi! Is it possible to render the action within the after_filter method, or is the rendering performed before? I have something like this: class FooController after_filter :send def a @content=... end def b @content=.. end protected def send send_data(@content,...) end end However, when calling the action a or b, the @content doesn''t get sent, but instead

All - I''m completely new to RoR and also new to programming in an MVC structure... The Pragmatic Programmers guide to Rails says, temptingly: "After filters can be used to modify the outbound response, changing the headers and content if required. Some applications use this technique to perform global replacements in the content generated by the controller?s templates (for

I have a common failure page that I may need to render to upon failing some test that occurs in an after_filter method. I''d like to use the after_filter to take over the control of the rendering, like so: def test_for_validity some_boolean = my_test return render(:action => ''disqualified'') unless some_boolean @success_controller ||= controller_name

Hello I would like to execute specific action rendering something into page after each of my ajax calls. In example I would like to update some div or display an alert. How I imagine it could work is as follows class ApplicationController < ActionController::Base after_filter :do_something_after_each_ajax_call def do_something_after_each_ajax_call if request.xml_http_request?

hi, I want to perform some action before/after each email was delivered. How can I apply before/after_filter to actionmailer? Thanks. Best Regards, Zhenjian -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://wrath.rubyonrails.org/pipermail/rails/attachments/20060722/8f014133/attachment.html

Hi Everyone, I tried doing this and it''s not working as I would expect it, but I''m not sure if it''s even possible. I have an app that generates and image on request and displays it to the user. To cut back on storage, and some security, I''d like the app to receive the view request, render the image, display it, then delete the file. I know this isn''t

On Aug 4, 2011, at 4:03 PM, Peter Lawrence wrote: > Bill, > I believe the empty-exception-specification example is a red-herring, > but that if you can construct an example where you think a landing-pad > requires multiple filter lists then I think we can then have a productive > conversation about it. > > I believe we can only get multiple filter lists in a

Bill, ooops, yes, I described the meaning of "throw(A)" backwards, but I still think my example shows why you cannot merge LandingpadInst while inlining because multiple filter-lists on a LandingpadInst don't make sense. Perhaps I'm reading your original spec wrong, perhaps I'm mis-reading Duncan's emails, but I read them to mean that your syntax supports

Hello, I want to emit a structured log entry (in YAML) for every request that hits my Rails app. For example, an entry in this log would look something like: --- SYSTEM_TIME: 0.0166666666666667 USER_TIME: 0.0999999999999996 DB_TIME: 0.00247621536254883 REAL_TIME: 0.091976 STATUS_CODE: 500 SESSION_ID: 64ad46a8841c66bbf64e93335cedc50d REQUEST_ID: 32d6a42f-da58-43e2-ab27-09d3e2a775cb

Hi Renato, >> OK :) Essentially what happens is as follows: when running destructors >> when exiting a scope (which may be a nested scope), if a destructor throws >> an exception then any remaining destructors are first run, then the >> Program_Error exception is thrown at the point of the scope exit. This >> may be caught by an enclosing handler. > >

Hi Renato, >> I don't understand what you are saying. Cleanups (e.g. destructors) > > Hi Duncan, > > Cleanup landing pads normally call destructors, but they're not a > destructor themselves. I'm simply saying that compiler generated > blocks (such as cleanups) should never depend on user variables. I see what you are saying now. Unfortunately optimizations

I''m using restful_authentication in my app and I have the before filters in my application rhtml: before_filter :login_required around_filter :set_timezone around_filter :catch_errors Currently I have them commented out while rspec''in but I''ll need to add them in my specs. def create @ticket = Ticket.new(params[:ticket]) @ticket.user = current_user if

On 6/19/2012 7:14 AM, SHIVA PRASAD wrote: > Dear LLVM Members, > > The below source code from gcc test suite replicates the > problem which i am facing. When it is built with clang, it throws an > abort(highlighted). > The following are my observations - > > 1. The object(tmp) is not getting destroyed immediately after the > exception is thrown. In case of

Dear LLVM Members, The below source code from gcc test suite replicates the problem which i am facing. When it is built with clang, it throws an abort (highlighted). The following are my observations - 1. The object(tmp) is not getting destroyed immediately after the exception is thrown. In case of Clang, the object is getting destroyed at a later point of time. 2. In case of gcc, the

I''m having an issue with flashing divs in IE (firefox is fine and the only other browser I''ve used) My scenario is as follows. I have 2 divs (initially hidden) and using the BlindDown and BlindUp functions (possibly others) the divs flash when starting to roll down in BlindDown (due to the Element.show call) and also at the end of the BlindUp call (due to the Element.hide call)

On Aug 5, 2011, at 10:57 AM, Peter Lawrence wrote: > Bill, > ooops, yes, I described the meaning of "throw(A)" backwards, I thought that might be the case. :) > but I still > think my example shows why you cannot merge LandingpadInst while > inlining because multiple filter-lists on a LandingpadInst don't make sense. > > Perhaps I'm reading your

I am using mongrel to serve static as well as dynamic pages. The static page''s controller contains the following line of code: after_filter {|c| c.cache_page} This code caches that page as a static html page that does not have to be rendered form multiple files (the view and layout). I got the idea to do this form the rails recipes book. It definitely cached the pages. Wen I make

Bill, I believe the empty-exception-specification example is a red- herring, but that if you can construct an example where you think a landing-pad requires multiple filter lists then I think we can then have a productive conversation about it. I believe we can only get multiple filter lists in a landing-pad if we attempt to merge exception-regions, and since filters are only an