similar to: Mirrored Servers

Hi All, I am about to embark on a project that deals with allowing information archival, over time and seeing change over time as well. I can explain it a lot better, but I would certainly talk your ear off. I really don't have a lot of money to throw at the initial concept, but I have some. This device will host all of the operations for the first few months until I can afford to build a

Gluster-user folks, I'm trying to use gluster in a way that may be a considered an unusual use case for gluster. Feel free to let me know if you think what I'm doing is dumb. It just feels very comfortable doing this with gluster. I have been using gluster in other, more orthodox configurations, for several years. I have a single system with 45 inexpensive sata drives - it's a

Folks, >From zfs documentation, it appears that a "vdev" can be built from more vdevs. That is, a raidz vdev can be built across a bunch of mirrored vdevs, and a mirror can be built across a few raidz vdevs. Is my understanding correct? Also, is there a limit on the depth of a vdev? Thank you in advance for your help. Regards, Peter -- This message posted from opensolaris.org

OP - Backblaze Personal. May be like $1/extra per month than your budget. Unlimited IO and backup storage assuming you only need redundancy. https://www.backblaze.com/cloud-backup.html Still going to take a while on initial upload. (Sounds almost AWS Snowball like is what you need but too costly). Regards, R. S. Tyler Schroder Redcoded.com Cyber Intellegence > On Feb 15, 2019, at 10:37

I made a filesystem (mke2fs -j) on a logical volume under kernel 2.6.20 on a 64-bit based system, and when I try to mount it, ext3 complains with EXT3-fs: dm-1: couldn't mount because of unsupported optional features (80). I first thought I just forgot to make the filesystem, so I remade it and the error is still present. I ran fsck on this freshly made filesystem, and it completed with

Maurice R Volaski via rsync <maurice.volaski at lists.samba.org> wrote: > I have an rsync script that it is copying one computer (over ssh) > to a shared CIFS mount on Gentoo Linux, kernel 6.3.4. The script > runs for a while and then at some point quits knocking my ssh > session offline on all terminals and it blocks ssh from being able > to connect again. Even restarting

I''ve been experimenting with a two system setup in snv_134 where each system exports a zvol via COMSTAR iSCSI. One system imports both its own zvol and the one from the other system and puts them together in a ZFS mirror. I manually faulted the zvol on one system by physically removing some drives. What I expect to happen is that ZFS will fault the zvol pool and the iSCSI stack will

I have an rsync script that it is copying one computer (over ssh) to a shared CIFS mount on Gentoo Linux, kernel 6.3.4. The script runs for a while and then at some point quits knocking my ssh session offline on all terminals and it blocks ssh from being able to connect again. Even restarting sshd doesn?t help. Rsync has apparently killed it. I have to reboot. -------------- next part

Recently, our backup software oddly decided to rebackup a good portion of our file server instead of just doing an incremental. When I examined various sets of presumably identical files, I discovered that the modification dates on these files were no longer the same. Many files were re-dated to exactly one hour later such that if a file had been modified on 3/24/04 at 2:24:53 PM, it's

Is there a current best practice for a shared filesystem backend for mailboxes (in my case, all virtual accounts)?? NFS 3/4, GFS2, GlusterFS, other?? In the case of the latter ones, is the use of Director necessary?? Any specific anti-recommendations?? Also, if it matters, I *think* I want to use BackBlaze racks for storage.? Also, I've seen recommendations for the filesystem underneath like

I created a filesystem as follows: mke2fs -j -O dir_index -O sparse_super -T largefile /dev/drbd/6 Here's the the output from df Filesystem Size Used Avail Use% /dev/drbd/6 475G 33M 452G 1% It seems that ext3 has taken 23 GB, which is about 5% of the total disk size, for itself. Is that right? If that is, indeed, the case, why does df just list 33M as being

Rsync 3.2.7 is running on the Gentoo computer, which doesn't have a version, other than it's "current". I'm running the script from this computer. Rsync 3.1.2 is on the source computer, where the files come from, which is Ubuntu 18.0.4.6. I'm copying to a CIFS share mounted on the Gentoo computer. The rsync scripts are all similar to this one: /usr/bin/rsync -v -a

Here''s something that might of interest to Mac aficionados: http://tenscomplement.com/z-410-storage-main-features -- Maurice Volaski, maurice.volaski at einstein.yu.edu Computing Support, Dominick P. Purpura Department of Neuroscience Albert Einstein College of Medicine of Yeshiva University -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

Maurice R Volaski <maurice.volaski at einsteinmed.edu> wrote: > Rsync 3.2.7 is running on the Gentoo computer, which doesn't have > a version, other than it's "current". I'm running the script from > this computer. > > Rsync 3.1.2 is on the source computer, where the files come from, > which is Ubuntu 18.0.4.6. > > I'm copying to a CIFS

Hi All, I started a 501c3 (not-for-profit) organization back in February 2011 to deal with information archival. A long vision here, I wont bore you with the details (if you really want to know, e-mail me privately) but the gist is I need to build an infrastructure to accommodate about 2PB of data that is database stuff, stored video, crawl data, static data sets, etc. Right now in my testing of

This mib used to work, so is there a way to go back to the version prior to this one without downgrading the whole package? * Starting UPS drivers... Network UPS Tools - UPS driver controller 2.4.1 Network UPS Tools - Generic SNMP UPS driver 0.44 (2.4.1) Detected GXT2-2000RT120 on host upswallleft (mib: ietf 1.3) [upswallleft] nut_snmp_get: 1.3.6.1.2.1.33.1.4.4.1.4.0: Error in

I need to get around the requirement of --exclude=* to have all the parent directories of the files and directories that are to be included. So given the file.. /startdirectory/subdirectory1/subdirectory2/filetobecopied I need to include / /subdirectory1 /subdirectory1/subdirectory2 I could just include the entire directory structure , but alternatively just include the needed paths. So the

Oracle have deleted the best ZFS platform I know, the X4540. Does anyone know of an equivalent system? None of the current Oracle/Sun offerings come close. -- Ian.

If I login to our Samba box (RedHat 7.1 + 2.4.20) under Windows 2K via Start->Run->share name, I get logged in almost immediately. It averages about 25 seconds under XP. This behavior has been true in various versions of Samba since I believe XP was available and is reproducible on every (several) Windows 2K/XP boxes I have tried. This is a workgroup environment with Samba acting as

On Feb 15, 2019, at 7:56 AM, Yan Li <elliot.li.tech at gmail.com> wrote: > > G Suite Business tier. Buy five users and you get unlimited Google Drive > storage. That's $50/month. So, you?re already 12x higher than his budget, and it?ll be going up 20% in early April. On top of that, there?s certainly a transfer rate limit. I couldn?t find a reliable source saying what that