similar to: Can''t boot HVM Win2k8 R2 x64 DVD ISO (Viridian?)

I am getting a-mail with security run output from one of my 9.2-RELEASE servers whose primary role is mysql server: sql1.kappastar.com login failures: Nov 18 02:11:09 sql1 sshd[58619]: Invalid user this-is-not-an-attack from 188.95.234.6 Nov 18 02:11:17 sql1 sshd[58621]: Invalid user this-is-not-an-attack from 188.95.234.6 Nov 18 04:54:10 sql1 sshd [59190]: reverse mapping checking getaddrinfo

Hi, Has anyone made a successfull instalation of cdr_odbc?? I've install unixODBC-2.2.8 (made my own RPM) and then built the module. I'm trying to send the cdrs to a M$ SQL server. The sql connection works because I can do any query via isql. When I do the calls I get the following output on the asterisk console: -- Executing Hangup("SIP/test1-a5e1", "") in new

# HG changeset patch # User Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@citrix.com> # Date 1322233890 0 # Node ID b4c07fbe3557ae501fc2d8a21b41f1b1cd5198cb # Parent 31e71820ce93b72b0223882f6c2e1f461920bda9 docs: xlexample.hvm: mention the viridian setting. Turning this on for Windows guests is recommended. Signed-off-by: Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@citrix.com> diff -r 31e71820ce93 -r b4c07fbe3557

Hi, I have set up an ubuntu edgy guest domain on a fiesty host domain. The installation was successful but on running xm create -c baseimage, I get the following error message: Error: (22, ''Invalid argument'') The problem seems very similar to the one here: http://lists.xensource.com/archives/html/xen-users/2007-07/msg00361.html but I''m not able to figure out what the

Just the output of one of the viridian enabled windows hvm machines: Florian virsh dumpxml titan <domain type=''xen'' id=''40''> <name>titan</name> <uuid>cedb6201-82d6-3c96-4da3-e0bfad6a7501</uuid> <memory>2097152</memory> <currentMemory>2097152</currentMemory> <vcpu>2</vcpu> <os>

Just the output of one of the viridian enabled windows hvm machines: Florian virsh dumpxml titan <domain type=''xen'' id=''40''> <name>titan</name> <uuid>cedb6201-82d6-3c96-4da3-e0bfad6a7501</uuid> <memory>2097152</memory> <currentMemory>2097152</currentMemory> <vcpu>2</vcpu> <os>

Hi All, I am adding the patch mentioned here http://lists.xen.org/archives/html/xen-changelog/2013-02/msg00235.html I am getting errors on compiling Xen tools. My /tools/include/xen-foreign/mkheader.py looks different from the one that is mentioned in the above link, which I feel is due to version difference. I am using Xen 4.3.3 version. My understanding is that due to this version difference I

Hi I''m wondering what does viridian=1 option actually does? I installed Xen 3.4.1 from Gitco''s and installed Windows 2008 R2 (standard) server, 64-bit, which supposed is hyper-v aware? But looking device manager i dont see anything special, still all using emulation drivers. Should i install Hyper-V IC? Terveisin/Regards, Pekka Panula, Net Servant Oy

Hi, I install a guest Fedora inside the host Fedora. When I use the service xend status to check the status of xend. It shows xend is running. However when I use xm create xen1 to start the guest domain xen1, it failed. The corresponding file xen1 is in /etc/xen/xen1. The error msg is as follows: [root@phillis xen]# xm create xen1 Using config file "./xen1". Going to boot Fedora

Hi guys! I installed XEN 4.0 on Debian Squeeze but I cannot get the first DomU (not an image) started. Attached you will find /etc/xen/xen1.conf and the result of "xm create -c /etc/xen/xen1.conf" in xen1.log. Can you help me? What did I wrong? Is it about the fstab in xen1 (see also attached)? Many thanks in advance! Regards Stefan

I''m not able to start, destroy, or delete a DomU: > xen1:~ # xm start test4 > Error: Domain is already running > Usage: xm start <DomainName> > > Start a Xend managed domain >   -p, --paused                   Do not unpause domain after starting it    >   -c, --console_autoconnect      Connect to the console after the domain   

Hey everyone, Thanks for the quick help resonses once again, We got some mail saying that RAM disks were not the way to go. So we re-installed, made several partitions to use, and rebuilt xen. However, we''re still having trouble mounting partitions when xeno-linux boots. We give a physical grant of one of our newly made paritions (/dev/hda14 in particular) to the domain. But when

# HG changeset patch # User Paul Durrant <paul.durrant@citrix.com> # Date 1316781326 -3600 # Node ID 55a9ffe0ca81b9b4183626f81fa54343d378704f # Parent cc339ab1d91789ed6ff4d3d9abc1bae2e90ac294 Add save/restore support for viridian APIC assist pfn. c/s 17b754cab7b0 introduced a per-VCPU viridian structure to store the APIC assist pfn. This patch adds support for save and restore of that

On Wed, 2014-11-05 at 17:56 +0100, Jonas Meurer wrote: [...] > So the question is: why does the VM run stable on xen1 while it > crashes all the time on xen2. If I compare xen1 and xen2, only > real difference is mainboard (Supermicro X8 on xen1; Supermicro > X9 on xen2) and CPU (Xeon L5939 on xen1; E5-2609 on xen2) > > As a next step I'll put the harddisks into another

Posted this to xen-users back in Oct (http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/xen/users/186768), but just confirmed that I''m still seeing this behavior on 4.1. Polling the UCE-SNMP-MIB::ssCpuRawIdle counter results in a total that''s double the actual number of cpu''s on the system, so for example: nms ~ # snmpwalk -v 2c -c ''XXX'' xen1

Package: xen-utils-common Version: 4.0.0-1 Severity: normal This is an offshoot of Bug#588888, but is really a separate issue. It appears that with hvmloader, the disk device names presented to the vm must by from a specific set that hvmloader knows how to emulate. Names like hd[a-c] and sd[a-c] work, but sr0 does not. While this makes sense, when you think about what hvmloader is doing, it is

I''m getting the error: xend (12, ''Cannot allocate memory'') From the command line after the Dom-0 goes through a period of heavy memory usage. I don''t have any hard numbers on how to duplicate it, but I''ll give you the steps I''ve gone through to duplicate the problem. First, some information about my setup. It''s a new setup, and

Hi all, I''m in the process of building a home server with OpenSolaris 2009.06. It''s main function is to serve files (hence using OpenSolaris for some ZFS goodness), but I want to host some Windows x64 VMs on it as well. Given that there are currently no x64 Windows drivers for xVM, I was thinking of starting with VirtualBox (which does have x64 Windows drivers), and then

Lets say you had 4 servers and you wanted to setup replicate and distribute. What methoid would be better: server sdb1 xen0 brick0 xen1 mirror0 xen2 brick1 xen3 mirror1 replicate block0 - brick0 mirror0 replicate block1 - brick1 mirror1 distribute unify - block0 block1 or server sdb1 sdb2 xen0 brick0 mirror3 xen1 brick1 mirror0 xen2 brick2 mirror1 xen3 brick3 mirror2 replicate block0 -

Tested on identical hardware (Dell SC1425) with a non-xen kernel, it wroks fine. However under Xen, this is what happens: xen1 ~ # ethtool eth0 Settings for eth0: No data available xen1 ~ # mii-tool eth0 SIOCGMIIPHY on ''eth0'' failed: Operation not supported Any ideas? Thanks, -- Ian P. Christian ~ http://pookey.co.uk _______________________________________________