similar to: Mongrel Apache 2.2 SSL

Hi all, I''ve been spending quite a lot of time trying to install a decent RoR server on my dedicated server (Ubuntu 6.06 LTS), and now, everything works. However, the performances are not really what I had expected... I would like to know what you think about it. Here is my config: 2GHz VIA proc, 1Gb RAM, SATA-II HD. I have apt-got ruby 1.8.4, mysql5 and installed rails 1.1.4 by

I am using Apache2.2 + mod_proxy_balancer + mongrel setup and my mongrel.conf file(for apache is like this) 2 3 <Proxy balancer://mongrel_cluster> 4 BalancerMember http://127.0.0.1:9000 5 BalancerMember http://127.0.0.1:9001 6 BalancerMember http://127.0.0.1:9002 7 </Proxy> 8 9 <VirtualHost *> 10 ServerAdmin rags at

Skipped content of type multipart/alternative-------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: new_notes Type: application/octet-stream Size: 5801 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://wrath.rubyonrails.org/pipermail/rails/attachments/20060723/34e20e45/new_notes.obj

Our Mephisto install kills Mongrels and causes Apache to pound the CPU. This started when we moved to Apache+mod_proxy_balancer+Mongrel. Here''s what we know: The following things are working OK, except when used in the combination listed above: mongrel, mongrel_rails, MySQL, Apache, mod_proxy_balancer. We believe these are all OK because we moved five other Rails apps to this

Our group has several web apps developed in ColdFusion, PHP, and Rails. The ColdFusion and PHP apps are on an older server, and the Rails apps on a new server. Ideally, we''d like them all to share the same server. Our current setup for the Rails server is Apache2.2 with mod_proxy_balancer and mongrel_cluster. We''d like to have specific directories be processed and served by

Thanks for the answer on server::start...that makes sense, just wanted to make sure I was not doing anything incorrectly. I am now running 3 mongrel servers as windows services (mongrel_cluster is not supported for windows). I have apache configured with with mod_proxy_balancer from the instructions at http://mongrel.rubyforge.org/docs/apache.html. I am able to access my app without a port

Anyone out there in Portland. I''ll be in town this weekend, and was looking for advice from Rubyists on things to do. Thanks, Jake

I recently moved an app. from lighttpd + fastcgi to apache 2.2 + mod_proxy_balancer + Mongrel. On lighttpd, I was using basic authentication with a configuration like this: auth.backend = "htpasswd" auth.backend.htpasswd.userfile = "/path/to/htpasswd" auth.require = ("/" => ("method" => "basic", "realm" => "My

Cheers, I''ve just published a blog post about scaling Rails with Apache 2.2, mod_proxy_balancer and Mongrel. This way you do not need another proxy server or load balancer for Mongrel. Just use Apache 2.2 and mod_proxy balancer. http://blog.innerewut.de/articles/2006/04/21/scaling-rails-with-apache-2-2-mod_proxy_balancer-and-mongrel Jonathan -- Jonathan Weiss

Hello All I am trying to install 5 mongrel servers against my app. i am using Vista. I found this article on a website.. but am stuck on one point. here are some notes from article: Now enable the needed modules (url rewriting, proxy, proxy_balancer e proxy_http) by editing the httpd.conf file (under c: \Apache_Software_Foundation\Apache2.2\conf, if you installed Apache in its standard path).

I have apache 1.3 with mod_ssl in front of mongrel/rails. Apache is setup to require client certification, and I''m trying to figure out how to pass the ssl env variables to mongrel. Here is the apache config to proxy requests to mongrel. I haven''t tried to pass env variables like this before so I''m not sure if it''s the apache config I have wrong, if mongrel

There is a big difference if you are not running a pure rails site. I am doing auth apache-side because I serve static content, perl scripts via cgi and feed the mongrel pack from Apache. The REMOTE_USER variable value can be passed to rails using a technique described deep down in one of the informative pieces on the Mongrel website. Bill On Mon, 12 Mar 2007 17:54:07 -0700, Matte Edens wrote:

I?m knew to rewrites on apache in combination with mongrelcluster. It?s urgend for me, because the server has an loadaverage about 10 :-((((( Ok so I?m using 3 mongrel-server on an mongrelcluster. The Loadbalancer ist apache I think, that my rewrites are not correct. Please can anybody check my rewrites ? That?s in my /etc/apache2/conf.d/rails.proxy_cluster.conf <Proxy

Sorry to bother you with a Rails "newbie"-like question, but I have been tearing my hair out for a couple of days with the deployment scenario I am trying to setup. I use a service provider that supports multiple domains via Virtual Hosts. I have all the software installed and "working". I want to deploy two apps under my domain and have the following in my .conf file:

I''m running Apache 2.0 as a proxy to several Mongrel/Rails apps, so that all of my Mongrel apps can be routed through the single Apache IP address. Apache 2.0 is already in use on the system, which is why I haven''t decided to use Apache 2.2. The problem I''m having is that this setup only works for Rails apps that do not use the public/index.html file as the main

after days and days of fighting back and forth with an apache/fastcgi environment, i found mongrel and was up and running smoothly in about 10 minutes. i''m having a hard time with something though. if i set up ProxyPass and ProxyPassRevers to the root of the site, everything works fine. however once i try to just use separate directories for all of my apps, none of the attachments

Hi all, I''m currently trying to get Mongrel running my app whilst fronted by apache 2.2 in a sub-directory via https. A bit convoluted I''ll grant you but necessitated by existing systems. The pertinent parts of my httpd.conf: <VirtualHost 123.123.123.123:12345> #historic choice of random port number DocumentRoot /var/www/admin ServerName admin.example.com:12345

Hi. I have a mongrel+apache2.2 config running. It happens that one of our partners request a response body containing ONLY one char. It happens that they reported me that sometimes (!) my response was going like this: ================================ <- this line is to separate this text HTTP/1.1 200 OK Date: Sat, 03 Nov 2007 23:12:16 GMT Server: Mongrel 1.0.1 Status: 200 OK Cache-Control:

Hey guys, Ok, basically I coded a ruby on rails CMS to manage a bunch of media files. I am finding that a lot of people are "hot linking" to these media files and would like to prevent this to save bandwidth. Usually in the past, it hasn''t been a problem, I would add something like the following to my .htaccess file RewriteEngine on RewriteCond %{HTTP_REFERER} !^$

I just moved from apache2/fcgi to apache2.2/mongrel and everything seems to work great except for 2 issues, one being major and one minor. the major issue i am experiencing is that after a period of time where my rails apps are not used, typically overnight, the mongrel processes become unresponsive. I currently have 3 apps running behind an apache2.2 proxy. every morning when i come in to